Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Mr. Buschur: HTA 35R with .63 hotside instead of .82?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2008, 07:52 AM
  #16  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
AlwaysinBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In da streetz
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zbomb
FWIW BR standard hotside on the HTA 35R is the .63. You can get the .82 as an option though.
that may be true but 95% of the testing and results posted on here for the HTA have been with the .82 housing. Not much love for the .63.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:03 AM
  #17  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
yellowEVO21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I was going to say most of the numbers posted have been with the .82
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:05 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
zbomb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here are Mellon's results, I'm sure I can find more. He is on the standard .63.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=313778
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:18 AM
  #19  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Poloiceberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ny
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm also definately interested in the results! Good luck!
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:38 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
LT1runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville Metro
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AlwaysinBoost
that may be true but 95% of the testing and results posted on here for the HTA have been with the .82 housing. Not much love for the .63.
I've got Love for the HTA35 w/.63 w/2.3 ltr. This turbo is spooling crazy fast.





Understand that this is at 26 psi. Spikes up to 29, but settles to 26. Look how it climbs to 29 psi. This thing comes on like a monster. I'm still pending a race gas map. I may just need to go to 1200cc intrs.

I'm not saying i have anything close to a world of experiance. I just don't know of a turbo as big as a 35R that spools this fast. 2.3 or not.

Last edited by LT1runner; Jan 29, 2008 at 08:42 AM.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 08:39 AM
  #21  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
Smogrunner, sorry, I never saw this post. Anyone who wants my attention in a post just send me a PM with a link and I'll be glad to stop by.

First, if you use the Tial or Garrett ported shroud compressor covers you will NOT experience any surging with the HTA35r.

Next, the .63 housing works very good with the 35r's. Depending on the build we are doing we will sometimes use the .82 housing. I have now tested a few different header designs and tested 4-5 different turbine housings with the HTA35r.

Overall I'd say the .63 housing works the best and a 2.5" outlet with a 2.5" 02 housing doesn't seem to hurt the power at all compared to the 3" stuff. The 3" does however make fabricating the housing, nicely, in one piece much easier.

It was said that most of the charts posted from us are on the .82 housing. That could seem true simpy because my car has a ton of charts posted BUT there are some kick *** charts posted with the .63 housing too. We've made 520 whp here on the .63 housing on 93 octane. Best ever was on Peter's car at 547 whp on the .82 but the car is also set up just like mine with nothing left out.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 12:03 PM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Gsxtremedsm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what do you think the spool difference is for the .63 to .82 I am debating between a 20glt and the hta35r(I know it is a big difference) anyhow I am running E-85 now so I would plan on running 26-29lbs of boost 90% of the time.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 12:18 PM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
yellowEVO21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LT - your car looks like it must be ridiculously fun to drive, I'm jealous!
Old Jan 29, 2008, 12:51 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
LT1runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville Metro
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh yeah. A very slight turn to the left or right, and the car wants to go sideways. Man it's fun, but don't be jealous, just get a HTA35R, get it on your car, and you too can have the fun I'm having. Does any have a boost plot for a Green or even a stock turbo. If so please post to see/compair to my 35R plot.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 01:07 PM
  #25  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
yellowEVO21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
true, I could rock a hta but you have the stroker so the increased torque and slightly less lag add to the fun factor!
Old Jan 29, 2008, 01:22 PM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
LT1runner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville Metro
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think you "need" the stroker. It helps, but if you stayed 2.0, you could spin it to 9500-10000 rpm. Something to think about.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 03:30 PM
  #27  
Evolved Member
 
JC evo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gsxtremedsm
So what do you think the spool difference is for the .63 to .82 I am debating between a 20glt and the hta35r(I know it is a big difference) anyhow I am running E-85 now so I would plan on running 26-29lbs of boost 90% of the time.
i'd like to hear the answer to this too.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 03:37 PM
  #28  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Poloiceberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ny
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LT1runner
I don't think you "need" the stroker. It helps, but if you stayed 2.0, you could spin it to 9500-10000 rpm. Something to think about.
does the .63ar still make power at those rpms?
Old Jan 29, 2008, 04:53 PM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
David Buschur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Received 32 Likes on 14 Posts
I haven't tested back to back on the .63 and .82 housings. All the housings I've tested over the last month were .82 or larger. I'd compare logs from different cars but that is never a good fair comparison. I will guess though based on what I have seen over the last month of extensive testing on the larger housings. I would have to guess the .63 on a 2 liter is going to make 20 psi around 200 rpm sooner.

I know the next question is going to be how much more power does the .82 make, unfortuneately I cannot answer that with any accuracy. Part of me says none, part of me says up to 20 whp.

I tested the 1.06 housing. The car made more top end power with less boost than it ever had before. BUT the midrange was not good, the losses in torque were not worth the trade off for ME.

I figure by the time this is all done I will be able to build one bad *** "something". I have so many ideas running through my head for my next project I'm not sure what I will end up doing.
Old Jan 29, 2008, 06:22 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
scorke's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nj
Posts: 5,192
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I haven't tested back to back on the .63 and .82 housings. All the housings I've tested over the last month were .82 or larger. I'd compare logs from different cars but that is never a good fair comparison. I will guess though based on what I have seen over the last month of extensive testing on the larger housings. I would have to guess the .63 on a 2 liter is going to make 20 psi around 200 rpm sooner.

I know the next question is going to be how much more power does the .82 make, unfortuneately I cannot answer that with any accuracy. Part of me says none, part of me says up to 20 whp.

I tested the 1.06 housing. The car made more top end power with less boost than it ever had before. BUT the midrange was not good, the losses in torque were not worth the trade off for ME.

I figure by the time this is all done I will be able to build one bad *** "something". I have so many ideas running through my head for my next project I'm not sure what I will end up doing.
The .82 should make another 30-50 whp on a full tilt car than the .63. The difference in spool as dave said should be about 2-300 rpm sooner at lower boost levels, although I would venture a guess that the difference between spool times to make 30 psi would be more considerable in the 4-500 rpm range.

Scorke


Quick Reply: Mr. Buschur: HTA 35R with .63 hotside instead of .82?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:13 AM.