Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Mr. Buschur: HTA 35R with .63 hotside instead of .82?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #46  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
First off, that's an SR20, second the two dyno pulls were started at different RPM's and I am baffled at it starting at 1600 rpm.

I will have to test the .63 vs the .82 as I don't think the power difference will be that high, 30 hp, as on this SR20. I don't think I had that much difference in 5 housing tests and don't see the .63 losing that much, too many cars made big power on the .63 here.

I'll throw the .63 on I bought when I get the intakes tested.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #47  
LT1runner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Metro
Thanks Dave!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 07:20 PM
  #48  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
Originally Posted by crcain
You said you thought there would be as much as 500 rpm between the two housings at 30 psi. The dyno chart posted seems to have very little difference in torque.
I did not say that. I said at 30 psi the difference in spool time would be (greater 4-500 rpm vs 2-300rpm to 20psi).

Unless you datalogged the SR20 on the dyno, or happened to be watching the boost guage and tach meticulously whilst it was being tested you have no farking idea when it hit 30 psi on either housing or if it even hit 30 psi........ so

you just lost an argument with yourself, keep it up.

Now i see why DB gets so furious with you

Scorke
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 07:47 PM
  #49  
Smogrunner's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Smogrunner, sorry, I never saw this post. Anyone who wants my attention in a post just send me a PM with a link and I'll be glad to stop by.

First, if you use the Tial or Garrett ported shroud compressor covers you will NOT experience any surging with the HTA35r.

Next, the .63 housing works very good with the 35r's. Depending on the build we are doing we will sometimes use the .82 housing. I have now tested a few different header designs and tested 4-5 different turbine housings with the HTA35r.

Overall I'd say the .63 housing works the best and a 2.5" outlet with a 2.5" 02 housing doesn't seem to hurt the power at all compared to the 3" stuff. The 3" does however make fabricating the housing, nicely, in one piece much easier.

It was said that most of the charts posted from us are on the .82 housing. That could seem true simpy because my car has a ton of charts posted BUT there are some kick *** charts posted with the .63 housing too. We've made 520 whp here on the .63 housing on 93 octane. Best ever was on Peter's car at 547 whp on the .82 but the car is also set up just like mine with nothing left out.
DB,
Thanks for the reply. I talked to Robert at Forced Performance a couple of days after I posted this and he was able to answer my questions. FP received my 35R on January 4th for the upgrade. It was supposed to be a one week turnaround, but they still have my turbo and its been 4 weeks. I've emailed them several times and they say they are waiting on a shipment of compressor housings. It is getting really hard to remain patient but I'm hanging in there. I just hope it is worth the wait.

BTW, my 35R has the 3inch o2 housing outlet, not the 2.5, so I was glad to hear you like that option....

As soon as I get it back, it'll all go back together pretty fast and I'll be sure to post up how it does. If anyone has any pull at FP, please see if they can find a way to get my turbo back to me sooner...

Last edited by Smogrunner; Jan 30, 2008 at 07:49 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #50  
scorke's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,192
Likes: 0
From: Nj
[QUOTE=Smogrunner;5222246]DB,
Thanks for the reply. I talked to Robert at Forced Performance a couple of days after I posted this and he was able to answer my questions. FP received my 35R on January 4th for the upgrade. It was supposed to be a one week turnaround, but they still have my turbo and its been 4 weeks. /QUOTE]


^ and that is exactly why I havent done this yet.

Scorke
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2008 | 09:00 PM
  #51  
sspaladin28's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: Socal
Good luck Smoggy, looking forward to seeing your new numbers. Let me know when you have it and Al is preparing for the tune so I can be there to watch please.

1wkdevo
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #52  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
This .63 vs .82 question would be a lot less confused if people would post this type of detail when they post their dyno results. For some reason this one detail is absent in almost every HTA dyno post I've seen. Mellon's thread is the one that really got me interested in the HTA35, because his is making like 200 whp already at 4000 rpm vs the 120 whp at 4000 I see on most of the charts, (also the cool video) , but when he was asked in the thread about a/r, he didn't know! The dynos posted by FP and Buscher don't say either!

I can see another area of confusion looming. As DB said he has tested about 5 different turbine housings. Not just different a/r but also different turbine outlet diameters. I gather that the 2.5 dia outlet housings are custom made for FP (not made by Garrett), whereas the 3.0 dia outlet housings are probably Garrett GT parts. For the Garrett GT housings, you can look up the corrected gas turbine flow charts for the 3 different a/r's. The difference in flow is a lot, for example at PR=2.0 it is 25 lbs/min (.82ar) vs 21 lbs/min (.63ar) - that's a 19% difference in exhaust gas flow required to get the same pressure ratio across the turbine blades. I would THINK that would make for more than a 200-300 rpm difference in spool. There are of course no charts for the custom 2.5" housings.

Anyway, it would be cool if the people posting dynos and so forth on their HTA35r's would go back and edit their posts to add the turbine a/r and turbine outlet size info. Yeah!

Gary
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #53  
2theMAX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Down South
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
DB,
Thanks for the reply. I talked to Robert at Forced Performance a couple of days after I posted this and he was able to answer my questions. FP received my 35R on January 4th for the upgrade. It was supposed to be a one week turnaround, but they still have my turbo and its been 4 weeks. I've emailed them several times and they say they are waiting on a shipment of compressor housings. It is getting really hard to remain patient but I'm hanging in there. I just hope it is worth the wait.

BTW, my 35R has the 3inch o2 housing outlet, not the 2.5, so I was glad to hear you like that option....

As soon as I get it back, it'll all go back together pretty fast and I'll be sure to post up how it does. If anyone has any pull at FP, please see if they can find a way to get my turbo back to me sooner...
There are alot of people waiting on those compressor housings. Me being one of them.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 02:29 PM
  #54  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
I don't think there is a reason to edit posts about what A/R people are running.

To be dead honest, I see no sense what-so-ever in putting every single detail into a post so some guy can come onto the forums, read what I am doing and put his **** together on his own to duplicate what I have done.

If ANYONE wants the absolute best combination for what they are trying to do all they have to do is pick up the phone and call a REAL shop and place the order.

Its like asking me the exact details on our engine building specs or head porting, it's just not getting published.

Believe it or not some of us are attempting to make a living with this stuff.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #55  
Talonboost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 1
From: Redmond Washington
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
To be dead honest, I see no sense what-so-ever in putting every single detail into a post so some guy can come onto the forums, read what I am doing and put his **** together on his own to duplicate what I have done.
From your standpoint, which is a business standpoint, yes I don't mind that you feel that way. I'm a Boeing guy and I know about the words "Proprietary" and "Intellectual Property" and so forth.

But if I buy one and post results on it, I absolutely will post my turbine a/r and outlet size, because those details may be helpful or at least interesting to the other buyers out there. That's what this forum is for.

Last edited by Talonboost; Feb 2, 2008 at 09:37 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 03:46 PM
  #56  
dan avoN7's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 134
Likes: 1
From: Danville, CA
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
DB,
Thanks for the reply. I talked to Robert at Forced Performance a couple of days after I posted this and he was able to answer my questions. FP received my 35R on January 4th for the upgrade. It was supposed to be a one week turnaround, but they still have my turbo and its been 4 weeks. I've emailed them several times and they say they are waiting on a shipment of compressor housings. It is getting really hard to remain patient but I'm hanging in there. I just hope it is worth the wait.
I'm in the same boat as you. My tuner gave me his HTA 35R from their time attack car since they weren't using the turbo for a few events. I then sent my turbo in to FP thinking it would be a fast turn around, Robert said the upgrade would only take 2 days from the time they got the turbo. It's now been 3 weeks since they've had the turbo Sucks since I said I would get it back quick and I know they need it for their car.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2008 | 10:27 PM
  #57  
SloRice's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,347
Likes: 0
From: West Chester, OH
^^What are you doing here?!?! This ain't no Subaru forum!!
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 06:26 AM
  #58  
Mellon Racing's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 9,319
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach, Virginia
I don't get hung up on a/r etc... I just buy what's proven to work and let the other's wonder about this and that.
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #59  
yellowEVO21's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 0
From: Central NJ
i just took a ride in U2SLO's car with the hta 3582.....OMG....if you ever worried about lag, this will put your fears to rest. this turbo is insane...

now im split between selling my car or putting this kit on it!
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2008 | 02:31 PM
  #60  
LT1runner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Metro
That's what I said about this turbo. But people have no idea about what they will "accept" as lag, and "know" how this turbo comes on.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:10 PM.