Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

built blocks AMS, B/R, JAM.. Who to go with and why

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 12:10 PM
  #46  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
david can u give us a quick 8.8sec 101 on compressure,boost,power.

i may say this wrong but ill try. if u run higher compression u can run less boost but make more power.... if u run lower compression u run less boost with less power. now if your running 25psi on pump you will knock or more **** to knock on a higher compression then a lower one. am i just retarted??? or can you explan this a little better so we can understand what compression ratio would be right for what each application would need to make the most out of that part of the setup.









i think i even confused myself.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 12:14 PM
  #47  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
evodan, I can't do a quick 101 on the subject. My suggestion is to just stick to around 9:1 and know you can make 500 whp easily on pump gas and 1,000+ on race gas.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #48  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
evodan, I can't do a quick 101 on the subject. My suggestion is to just stick to around 9:1 and know you can make 500 whp easily on pump gas and 1,000+ on race gas.

i think that might of just answerd most questions. haha. ty.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:25 PM
  #49  
bigric09's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,146
Likes: 2
From: Spec-Ops Motorsports, Fayetteville, NC
Originally Posted by freshsrt-4
BR most definately for the built 2.0l. ams and jam are great companies too but for the 2.0l i'd give it to BR all day long. do a search and you'll see why. look a shep's car and look whose motor he runs.......Buschur
you have absolutely no evo engine building experience... you know what your bandwagon tells you you know.

To the OP... Id go personally with who has what in stock. Most everyone, aside from JAM, has the same parts. Price is always slightly different, but in the end, how long of a wait do you have for what you want or how long are you willing to wait ? I've seen the AMS head, ive seen the JAM head and they both look great... ofcourse JAM has their added touch to things which is nice, and i havent dealt with a more professional company. CBRD is Jam built and his last setup made 49x hp on pump on their mustang dyno. Each place has great reputations, and they are deserved for sure. But to say id go hands down with x company because i've heard blah blah blah is just down right stupid.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2008 | 09:30 PM
  #50  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
ams!
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 09:23 AM
  #51  
stig's_mentor's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
From: london, uk
Originally Posted by evodan2004
david can u give us a quick 8.8sec 101 on compressure,boost,power.

i may say this wrong but ill try. if u run higher compression u can run less boost but make more power.... if u run lower compression u run less boost with less power. now if your running 25psi on pump you will knock or more **** to knock on a higher compression then a lower one. am i just retarted??? or can you explan this a little better so we can understand what compression ratio would be right for what each application would need to make the most out of that part of the setup.

i think i even confused myself.
my experience with compressions: when i went lower compression, yes i made more torque, and was allowed to run more boost, but i lost power.

this was on the fuel i was usin, which might make a big difference (****ty pump fuel)

9.0:1 comp does not compromise in any way. u should make good power, and good torque. like i said, on pump fuel. and u will probably make it sooner, though im no expert, jus my experience.

if u gonna run 30 + psi, then maybe u can afford to lose the hp, to make more torque. in other words low comp.

personally id go with 9.0:1
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 03:36 PM
  #52  
CBRD's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,363
Likes: 8
From: york, pa 17402
Pick whom you feel your personality fits with.

AMS, BR, and JAM all have different approaches with their personalities, businesses, and builds.... and they are all excellent.

cb
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2008 | 06:55 PM
  #53  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by stig's_mentor
9.0:1 comp does not compromise in any way.
Actually, every possible compression ratio effectively represents a compromise, one way or another.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tscompusa
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
158
Jan 17, 2017 02:52 PM
KennyRS
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
76
Oct 10, 2012 07:58 AM
lonestarevo83
Evo General
8
Aug 17, 2011 04:35 PM
Tonba
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Jun 14, 2009 05:54 PM
Derek888
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Feb 22, 2006 08:13 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM.