My HTA dyno results (more boost)
#16
iTrader: (24)
I'm always confused about Dyno Dynamics dyno results because I never know if they are the ones that are trying to read like Dynojets or not.
In the UK that power would be thought to be around 680 hp at the crank.
Why does Dyno4mance not include the data at the bottom of the sheet for the run like a sheet like this does?
http://www.lancerregister.com/attach...postid=1397336
In the UK that power would be thought to be around 680 hp at the crank.
Why does Dyno4mance not include the data at the bottom of the sheet for the run like a sheet like this does?
http://www.lancerregister.com/attach...postid=1397336
This dyno reads about 15% lower than a Dynojet.
#19
LT1 sorry to go slightly off-topic in your thread. I bet your 2.3 HTA is the bomb. I just wish I had a better orientation of how to compare DD results like this to others.
By the way LT1... your spoolup looks terrific in the dyno graph. Any chance you could log a 3rd and then a 4th gear pull on the road so we could all see how the spool is on the road ofthe 2.3 + HTA combo?
I have spoolup results for 2.4 + HTA and I would love to see yours to compare. If I recall, I make 30 psi by 4500 in 4th.
#24
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have very similar setups. 2.3, ported head, TBE, MAF-T Pro. The only major differences are I have the 3065 and HKS 272s. I would be interested in seeing how our torque curves compare using something like DataLogLab. The absolute numbers don't mean much, but the shape of the curves should tell a lot. It seems that the HTA 35r has the midrange of the 3065 and the top end of the 35R. Maybe I need to upgrade.
-Paul
-Paul
#25
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Nashville Metro
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We have very similar setups. 2.3, ported head, TBE, MAF-T Pro. The only major differences are I have the 3065 and HKS 272s. I would be interested in seeing how our torque curves compare using something like DataLogLab. The absolute numbers don't mean much, but the shape of the curves should tell a lot. It seems that the HTA 35r has the midrange of the 3065 and the top end of the 35R. Maybe I need to upgrade.
-Paul
-Paul
#27
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice job. I am trying to get rid of my 3065 for this upgrade. The difference is that i run race gas daily around 30psi and a EMS so i should see some nice gains. I really like this turbo and what it puts out thus far. dont get me wrong, meth is great but im not the biggest fan since i can afford race gas which will put down more power.
2.3 HTA+30-35psi=
2.3 HTA+30-35psi=
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
You couldn't be more wrong. Have you ever read what Shootout mode is or what it is for? All the UK Dyno Dynamics operators use shootout mode. And it has been proven several times by taking an engine from an engine dyno, into a car, and onto a DD that 24% is a good estimate to convert from Shootout power at the wheels, to engine flywheel power.
LT1 sorry to go slightly off-topic in your thread. I bet your 2.3 HTA is the bomb. I just wish I had a better orientation of how to compare DD results like this to others.
By the way LT1... your spoolup looks terrific in the dyno graph. Any chance you could log a 3rd and then a 4th gear pull on the road so we could all see how the spool is on the road ofthe 2.3 + HTA combo?
I have spoolup results for 2.4 + HTA and I would love to see yours to compare. If I recall, I make 30 psi by 4500 in 4th.
LT1 sorry to go slightly off-topic in your thread. I bet your 2.3 HTA is the bomb. I just wish I had a better orientation of how to compare DD results like this to others.
By the way LT1... your spoolup looks terrific in the dyno graph. Any chance you could log a 3rd and then a 4th gear pull on the road so we could all see how the spool is on the road ofthe 2.3 + HTA combo?
I have spoolup results for 2.4 + HTA and I would love to see yours to compare. If I recall, I make 30 psi by 4500 in 4th.
shootout mode was developed by Dyno Dynamics primarily to eliminate "Operator Technique" and as a tool for measuring horsepower accurately and CONSISTENTLY for ALL Dyno Dynamics dynos with Shootout accreditation. All dynos with Shootout accreditation have been calibrated the same accross the board, and should not vary more than 1% when comparing between Dyno Dynamics dynos.
#29
I can name a number of DD's in the UK... WRC Tech, Scoobyclinic, The Racing Line, and many more. All run in Shootout mode, full stop. Never seen one dyno chart posted that was not run in this mode.
A bone stock Evo 8 I think runs about 210 hp atw.
Totally maxed out stock turbo IX's run about 300 hp atw I think.
I believe that makes DD's run in Shootout mode the lowest reading dyno when compared to Mustang and Dynojet.
A bone stock Evo 8 I think runs about 210 hp atw.
Totally maxed out stock turbo IX's run about 300 hp atw I think.
I believe that makes DD's run in Shootout mode the lowest reading dyno when compared to Mustang and Dynojet.
#30
iTrader: (24)
You couldn't be more wrong. Have you ever read what Shootout mode is or what it is for? All the UK Dyno Dynamics operators use shootout mode. And it has been proven several times by taking an engine from an engine dyno, into a car, and onto a DD that 24% is a good estimate to convert from Shootout power at the wheels, to engine flywheel power.
LT1runner's car should make around 585whp on a Dynojet and well over 600 in shootout mode. What is shootout mode for? Its an "estimated flywheel" number and is also not able to be manipulated by the dyno operator as standard mode is.
In the end, the flywheel number shouldn't matter, because the dyno is a tuning tool, not a bragging tool. Cheers.