ATP kit strikes again!!!!
Deadbeat obviously doesn't really care about, or isn't going to change his setup because of anyone's opinions or suggestions regarding his setup, so I just hope he is satisfied with the car and enjoys it. The feud between Scorke and Deadbeat is entertaining. Please take it to the strip for once and for all. You both always say you are down, so just do it already or stop talking so much $h!t on each other's threads!
Deadbeat: they must really salt the **** out of the roads up in Albany! All the corrosion made me cringe a little, but I give you props for apparently driving the car on the street a lot all year 'round, which is what matters to me! Just too bad they don't switch over to the cinders they use out here, it's much nicer on the cars.
Deadbeat: they must really salt the **** out of the roads up in Albany! All the corrosion made me cringe a little, but I give you props for apparently driving the car on the street a lot all year 'round, which is what matters to me! Just too bad they don't switch over to the cinders they use out here, it's much nicer on the cars.
Account Disabled
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: In a house
How high can this turbo be run to? I wouldn't think more than 35psi. Considering the pull was done after 4000rpms the spool isn't as bad as has been seen. Wouldn't the spool be a little quicker if the pull was done at 3000rpms? Or maybe all it takes is 1000rpms for the kit to hit full boost? Either way I think the numbers are impressive despite a small hit in spool.
trying to help with what? u think i care what other people think about my choices? haha. im happy and last time i knew, i was the only one driving it. and i know the spool isnt bad at all. this is my third turbo and by far the best in terms of power and driveability.
Scorke-
I want to compare something. I'm not measuring penises or touting the ATP kit. I will be switching to something else in the future. When I bought mine it was really cheap and it is stealth for us CA guys. But I know it is restrictive to peak power. I want to get an idea of what the spool difference is since we have similar setups.
You have a 2.3 with which 35r kit?
I have a 2.3 with the ATP 35R with the .63 AR turbine housing on the stock exhaust manifold. The exhaust manifold and turbine housing were extrude honed together as one piece so the crappy transition was fixed. Due to some material being removed from the turbine housing, it is not truly a .63 but close enough.
I consistenly get 22 psi at 4150-4250RPM loaded up in 3rd gear on a flat road. 27~ psi comes another 100-200 RPM later. I just recently started over with my tune so I wont have any high boost logs but I'll try to get a 3rd gear 22psi log and post it. (I have to remember to switch from kPa to psi
)
Where does your car spool?
I want to compare something. I'm not measuring penises or touting the ATP kit. I will be switching to something else in the future. When I bought mine it was really cheap and it is stealth for us CA guys. But I know it is restrictive to peak power. I want to get an idea of what the spool difference is since we have similar setups.
You have a 2.3 with which 35r kit?
I have a 2.3 with the ATP 35R with the .63 AR turbine housing on the stock exhaust manifold. The exhaust manifold and turbine housing were extrude honed together as one piece so the crappy transition was fixed. Due to some material being removed from the turbine housing, it is not truly a .63 but close enough.
I consistenly get 22 psi at 4150-4250RPM loaded up in 3rd gear on a flat road. 27~ psi comes another 100-200 RPM later. I just recently started over with my tune so I wont have any high boost logs but I'll try to get a 3rd gear 22psi log and post it. (I have to remember to switch from kPa to psi
)Where does your car spool?
V8, please re-read my post.
Newbie
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Albany, NY
So moral of the story, deadbeat's car is making great power and he is happy with its spool time and powerband.
I think the thread title might tend to spark some fierce scrutiny for the ATP haters, I think DB will admit that as well. All things considered, that is one hell of a daily driver.
I still want to see a dynojet dyno, 2.0L 30R non-ATP pull @ around 28 psi. If we're talking anything less than 500 RPM difference then I'd have to say its negligible for street duty.
I think the thread title might tend to spark some fierce scrutiny for the ATP haters, I think DB will admit that as well. All things considered, that is one hell of a daily driver.
I still want to see a dynojet dyno, 2.0L 30R non-ATP pull @ around 28 psi. If we're talking anything less than 500 RPM difference then I'd have to say its negligible for street duty.
So moral of the story, deadbeat's car is making great power and he is happy with its spool time and powerband.
I think the thread title might tend to spark some fierce scrutiny for the ATP haters, I think DB will admit that as well. All things considered, that is one hell of a daily driver.
I still want to see a dynojet dyno, 2.0L 30R non-ATP pull @ around 28 psi. If we're talking anything less than 500 RPM difference then I'd have to say its negligible for street duty.
I think the thread title might tend to spark some fierce scrutiny for the ATP haters, I think DB will admit that as well. All things considered, that is one hell of a daily driver.
I still want to see a dynojet dyno, 2.0L 30R non-ATP pull @ around 28 psi. If we're talking anything less than 500 RPM difference then I'd have to say its negligible for street duty.