Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New FP White turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 06:18 AM
  #391  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by GrocMax
Tom-

I just got back from the dirt track (Ardmore OK), cooked BBQ for 150 people.
Only 50 *****ed. I suck. Ask Ronny Gould. It's his fault. Friggin' Okies. Between him and his brother they've only won like 1200 features.

We gave everyone here nothing but facts. No hype, we posted real numbers. Look at the early pages.

When was the last time you ever saw a vendor post a dyno graph, and a log of that run with TIMING and THE ACTUAL BOOST CURVE and conditions?

I'd say never.

The difference between this and the 1580 occurs at higher PR's.

There is NOTHING you can do to make a TD05H work better at 7K plus.

Its a 'small' turbine wheel, performance is going to suffer at high RPM. Look at the exhaust pressure. Eventually it goes sky high. It doesn't matter if Tom or Fred or FP or Joe Average is using it, it has certain characteristics, it has a performance window.

I tried to talk Tom out of spending any time on this unit, other than use it as a 'filter'. He has better things to do with his time.

Dumb Okie wouldn't listen.

I think maybe that's why he goes fast.

DO NOT BUY a 'White' if your primary focus is drag racing. You'll lose too much top end.

This unit is strictly for those who NEED response and low/mid.
Hey, I wasn't the one who decided to Cook for 150 people, and OKIE'S on top of that. See, we only play dumb so we can get a Texan to cook for us. Works every time.

As far as the White, I like the feeling of running it up to 3500 and hitting the twisties, then nailing it and having it throw every piece of crap in the car to the back of the trunk. Ask David about the INSTANT response we got in first gear. Lag, what the hell is that? And that was with a long winded manifold, me, David, laptop, helmets, tools (not many), etc. Ask my log buddy, Jeff. It's a very responsive turbo.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 06:26 AM
  #392  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by EVIL_EV0
Those graphs aren't really for me but they are interesting. I doubt anyone else will push the limits quite as hard.

For the money it really does look like a decent upgrade. You would really have to be into car bowling to "need" a green.

Did you log airflow? How many pounds was that thing flowing?
There are many people who will try and push it to limits even beyond the 40 psi. There are posters on this forum who go beyond 40 and make 1-3 passes at Banzai levels, just to make a record. We don't do that. We could, but I like keeping the turbos at least for a year. Not one race and replace it. You'd be surprised at who 'pushes' it beyond it's limits. I try to give realistic useable limits. Then, you can fill in the area below my boost levels.
I don't have the logs, but of course David does. I don't know if he will post it or not. Since I'm a programmer, I understand very clearly, ownership rights of data and programs.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 06:49 AM
  #393  
Dennis F's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 494
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by Indy Evo
This test showed what a White could do with a max effort build.
The same exact test was done with a white rabbit turbo and look how that turned out

Don't be so thick in the head already. It is nice 9sec9 did this test, but it is not real world data that is going to be repeated by the masses, just like the white rabbit.

Everyone thought, 440 hp on race gas wooohoooo.

Gimme a break.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 06:51 AM
  #394  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by evoPirate
Jerk offs and ****? Yea, there ya go guys, that just puts me right in my place *rolls eyes*

I stand by what I said, and what many other people wanted to see, the turbo tested for what its meant to do. Its not like tom had a contractual obligation to test this turbo and spend his money. Something tells me testing this turbo wasn't the sole reason for his trip to wakeman. BR didn't have any common modded cars to throw this on? The basic bolt on pump gas car this turbo is meant for? Trust me, I appreciate SOMEONE doing a test and giving us info, especially a respected source. But you guys coming on here throwing a hissy because everyone wanted to see what it does on its intended market, that's just rediculous. I get mad too when people ask for different tests....but its the guys who say test it at this psi, test it with these cams, back to back this turbo with this manifold....THAT'S annoying. This, is not the same, so don't treat it as the same.
evoPirate has a valid point. He and I PM'd each other about his concerns, but was very polite and I take absolutely no offense to his comment. It wasn't meant mean spirited. My point in later posts is how to arrive at the lower numbers by interpolating the data to different psi's. It isn't linear, but it's close to linear between 25 and 30 than it is between 32 and 40. 25 to 30 psi would be about 10 whp per psi. 32-40 it would begin at about 9.5 and diminish by .75-1 for every psi above 32, so by the time you reach 38 psi, you'll only see 14 whp for the additional 6 psi at 7500. Yes, 14 whp is all you gain up top after adding 6 psi of boost and that's even after 'fixing' the AFR's. The heat was so high that the AFR's had to have fuel pulled because they went rich. IE, not very efficient.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 06:58 AM
  #395  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by Dennis F
The same exact test was done with a white rabbit turbo and look how that turned out

Don't be so thick in the head already. It is nice 9sec9 did this test, but it is not real world data that is going to be repeated by the masses, just like the white rabbit.

Everyone thought, 440 hp on race gas wooohoooo.

Gimme a break.
Dennis F, I understand what you're saying and don't disagree. A peak number means nothing if it can't perform. You're 440 whp example I assume is of a std White Rabbit? At that same power level, 443 whp, we took the Green to 10.61 at 130.49 and had much more left in it. OKIX was lift shifting with 1.05 seconds of off throttle time. We also did it at 40 degrees outside temps and a cold track. My point is exactly what you posted, all 440 whp cars are not equal. This new White with proper manifold and build will be a mid 10 second car. I'll put money on it. This turbo, however, is designed for the AutoX guys and street cars, not a car like ours. I just wanted to take the time to find it's 'breaking' point. That's all this test was meant to accomplish. It's up to others to use this data/psi/rpm points and get the most as quickly as possible out of their own builds. It should eliminate a bunch of beating on their cars, just to find the sweet spot.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:07 AM
  #396  
TKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho
9sec9 you loved the "white"? I'm still questioning which route to go just because of the mods I'm going with. I won't be auto-x or dragging ALL the time. This is my daily driver. I want to be able to lay my foot down if someone challenges me or some way in that area, ya know? The "green" and the "white" have and still is beating my head senseless.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:09 AM
  #397  
equinsu-ocha's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
If a combo was built for a straight 93 octane street car, V0 mani, full headwork,
and built engine, would there be any benefit to keeping the boost at a more reasonable say 26psi and bumping up the static compression by 0.5 or 1. With this combo, if viable, what would be the ideal cam for the powerband?

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:27 AM
  #398  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by TKEVO
9sec9 you loved the "white"? I'm still questioning which route to go just because of the mods I'm going with. I won't be auto-x or dragging ALL the time. This is my daily driver. I want to be able to lay my foot down if someone challenges me or some way in that area, ya know? The "green" and the "white" have and still is beating my head senseless.
TKEVO, YES I loved the White. It has very similar power up top, but spools quicker than expected (Remember, our mani was for top end) and at 26-28psi could show dyno numbers of 400+. That's not on Davids Mustang, but it will on many other dynos. Response was immediate at 3500 and nail it and it pulled all the way to 8400 rpms. That was the manifold talking, but the turbo in midrange will make a great combo. FWIW, If I was building a daily street car, I would be using the White, the V0 Street Version manifold, some good 272 cams (Pick: FP4R, GSC S2, Kelford's, Cosworth M2, HKS 272(maybe)), 65 mm TB, and the normal supsects in exhaust and porting. I'd run 93 daily and when it came race time, I'd reflash it, turn the boost to 32, put some C16 or Q16 in it and have some fun. That's just me, but it would keep it as a daily driver with great around town response, then at the track, it would give up very little when compared to the Green. Yes, I loved the White.

Last edited by 9sec9; Jul 6, 2008 at 07:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:32 AM
  #399  
9sec9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,275
Likes: 1
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by equinsu-ocha
If a combo was built for a straight 93 octane street car, V0 mani, full headwork,
and built engine, would there be any benefit to keeping the boost at a more reasonable say 26psi and bumping up the static compression by 0.5 or 1. With this combo, if viable, what would be the ideal cam for the powerband?

Thanks.
equinsuo-ocha, First of all, when you bump the static by 1, you're 93 will become marginal, just like 91 is marginal on a 8.8 - 9.0. The reasonable, in my opinion, would not be 26 psi on 93 with a 10 motor. At least not without pulling a ton of timing. If you did that, you're power will suffer. I would leave the higher static pressures to the higher octane fuels, especially if you're going to be running above 25 psi. I know, there's tuners who might be able to tune it, but reliability may become a question. Any of the good 272's will work.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #400  
Indy Evo's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,113
Likes: 0
From: Nitro Alley, IN
All the info has been laid out on the table, from bolt ons to the max effort full build. There should be plenty of info now for someone to make their mind up. In my opinion this is a damn good street turbo period. Indy

Last edited by Indy Evo; Jul 6, 2008 at 08:17 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 08:58 AM
  #401  
PsychDr. HN$'s Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
bump for info/mods list on Robert's car in post #13...
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #402  
equinsu-ocha's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Indy has the Green on his DD and wants to swap it for the White? That's enough proof for me that the White is what I need.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 10:12 AM
  #403  
TKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho
Well some don't know everything as much as some that's why we try to get as much information as I can before I purchase anything. If I have a question up here, dang on skippy I'm going to ask, no matter how stupid it may sound. I like to have things clarified and get opinions.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 10:14 AM
  #404  
TKEVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho
Originally Posted by equinsu-ocha
Indy has the Green on his DD and wants to swap it for the White? That's enough proof for me that the White is what I need.
He told me he was using green for track and white for street.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #405  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
Originally Posted by 9sec9
TKEVO, YES I loved the White. It has very similar power up top, but spools quicker than expected (Remember, our mani was for top end) and at 26-28psi could show dyno numbers of 400+. That's not on Davids Mustang, but it will on many other dynos. Response was immediate at 3500 and nail it and it pulled all the way to 8400 rpms. That was the manifold talking, but the turbo in midrange will make a great combo. FWIW, If I was building a daily street car, I would be using the White, the V0 Street Version manifold, some good 272 cams (Pick: FP4R, GSC S2, Kelford's, Cosworth M2, HKS 272(maybe)), 65 mm TB, and the normal supsects in exhaust and porting. I'd run 93 daily and when it came race time, I'd reflash it, turn the boost to 32, put some C16 or Q16 in it and have some fun. That's just me, but it would keep it as a daily driver with great around town response, then at the track, it would give up very little when compared to the Green. Yes, I loved the White.
Thanks 9sec9 for all the valuable information you have provided us . Just your above post says it all about how the new White turbo will apply to numerous applications. I will need to ask FP about what size injectors to upgrade to run with my water/ alcohol injection. Now if only my government rebate check will arrive so I could get this thing.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:09 AM.