twinscroll/singlescroll TURBO SHOOTOUT -- full-race / VE engineering / vivids dyno
#31
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Wow, sounds like you guys have some serious work cut out for yourselves.
Thanks for the hard work. While it can't become some be-all/end-all comparison, as there will always be some reason somebody isn't happy. I think it will greatly improve the understand people have of how the different setups perform.
It would be interesting to see a TS vs. single scroll comparison at a lower boost level. It seems like TS setups that use big cams with decent overlap just make SICK power at low boost levels where exhaust flow is the controlling factor and not compressor flow.
Thanks for the hard work. While it can't become some be-all/end-all comparison, as there will always be some reason somebody isn't happy. I think it will greatly improve the understand people have of how the different setups perform.
It would be interesting to see a TS vs. single scroll comparison at a lower boost level. It seems like TS setups that use big cams with decent overlap just make SICK power at low boost levels where exhaust flow is the controlling factor and not compressor flow.
#32
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san antonio
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi ron, were not going to try and mimic backpressure to determine which housing to run, we only have so much time so we will test the setups that are considered the "standard" and go from there. .63 a/r is too small and a waste of time imho. the runner dia is another point of debate, as we use a different runner dia for our twinscroll vs singlescroll headers. if people can agree on one methodology, we'll test it this week. if you and dave would rather supply a shearer header/turbo/downpipe for us to test the singlescroll stuff with i would be honored.
you really want Full-Race to do a test using a shearer manifold what is wrong with using a Full-Race singlescroll T3 manifold? Dave Buschur even had one on his car for a little while. adding the 4088R to the test is do-able, just one more turbo to add to the list
you really want Full-Race to do a test using a shearer manifold what is wrong with using a Full-Race singlescroll T3 manifold? Dave Buschur even had one on his car for a little while. adding the 4088R to the test is do-able, just one more turbo to add to the list
#33
Evolving Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san antonio
Posts: 344
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For some people like myself, the real top end power proof is trap speeds(with car weight considered), which we have yet to see on Full-Race t4 TS kit on a 35r frame turbo or 4088r with a built ***** to the wall 35psi+ pass. Still waiting for that proof. IMO The best thing for all Evo owners would be for Full-Race to have an incredible trap speed to go along with their great response and quality kits. That way everyone would have to step up their game.
#35
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
I'm unsubscribing, how's that work for ya? I wasn't turning this into a pissing match, I was stating testing it the way it was pointed out is BS and it is.
Nothing wrong with the .63 housing. Tubing diameter has to stay the same too.
Now carry on. I'm done with this one.
Nothing wrong with the .63 housing. Tubing diameter has to stay the same too.
Now carry on. I'm done with this one.
I know man I like David Buschur, I have his parts on my suby, but thats just childish. I reread Geoff post 5 times and I don't see anything offensive at all,
GEOFF
I was thinking about using the .68 a/r singlescroll T4 (behavies similarly to the .82 t3 I singlescroll) but if you say .82 singlescroll T3 is the only one you will take seriously thats what we will test.
To make sure i understand - you are recommending that we test the hta35R and gt3582R in a .82 a/r T3 on a singlescroll T3 manifold? Then we can retest them as twinscroll T4 1.06?
To make sure i understand - you are recommending that we test the hta35R and gt3582R in a .82 a/r T3 on a singlescroll T3 manifold? Then we can retest them as twinscroll T4 1.06?
#37
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
Should have left " twin scroll/ single scroll" out of the title. I dont think this turbo shootout is a waste of time. I think you will learn some interesting things. But from what I am reading here so far, comparing single scroll setups to TS here is a complete fail. When doing back to back comparisons it is pertinent to change only one variable. IE exhaust housing only, primary runner size only, turbo only. I have never seen a good test comparison of single scroll to twin scroll. And that is because it would be very time consuming to change only one variable at a time. I have seen plenty of graphs showing TS has the ability to spool a turbo faster. But non of those have shown the potential HP gain or loss compared to same turbo in perfected single scroll setup.
#38
Evolved Member
iTrader: (39)
I was told by many people that a twinscroll 67mm will have a more usuable powerband and have much better drivability than my old open volute gt3582r. I should have the twinscroll setup under my hood soon. I will absolutely chime in with my impression on whether it feels better on the street.
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
Should have left " twin scroll/ single scroll" out of the title. I dont think this turbo shootout is a waste of time. I think you will learn some interesting things. But from what I am reading here so far, comparing single scroll setups to TS here is a complete fail. When doing back to back comparisons it is pertinent to change only one variable. IE exhaust housing only, primary runner size only, turbo only. I have never seen a good test comparison of single scroll to twin scroll. And that is because it would be very time consuming to change only one variable at a time. I have seen plenty of graphs showing TS has the ability to spool a turbo faster. But non of those have shown the potential HP gain or loss compared to same turbo in perfected single scroll setup.
To get the full benefits of a TS setup, it seems like you need to focus much more on getting huge exhaust flow out of the motor. Conventional wisedom seems to show that a large imbalance between intake and exhaust flow is optimal, where with the TS stuff, it seems like you want an intake:exhaust flow ratio closer to 1. More exhaust cam, more overlap, larger exhaust runners, etc.
This design idea on an open scroll turbo seems to make it prone to exhaust reversion and the motors don't do as well at high boost as a motor with a more conventional intake:exhaust ratio.
#42
Evolving Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Full-race...
I have to give you guys and mangumpsi a ton of credit undertaking such a great test like this. I am VERY interested to see the results. Should make for some great brain food from what I have seen so far.
I really hope the childish stuff and knit picking nonsense by the overly critical people with a less than constructive agenda does not railroad it.
I wish there was a 6262 with a TS housing available, even a TS 6265 would be very interesting. Precision probably has one under development... lets hope.
In for the results and on-going discussion.
I have to give you guys and mangumpsi a ton of credit undertaking such a great test like this. I am VERY interested to see the results. Should make for some great brain food from what I have seen so far.
I really hope the childish stuff and knit picking nonsense by the overly critical people with a less than constructive agenda does not railroad it.
I wish there was a 6262 with a TS housing available, even a TS 6265 would be very interesting. Precision probably has one under development... lets hope.
In for the results and on-going discussion.
#43
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: South
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Could we possibly get a Garrett GT3076R vs HTA3076r, both .63 a/r and .82 a/r housings?
Edit: Reason I ask for this, this is perfect for the "mild setup." People who are interested in keeping stock blocks/stock clutch/stock ecu. Power ranging from 400-500whp.
Edit: Reason I ask for this, this is perfect for the "mild setup." People who are interested in keeping stock blocks/stock clutch/stock ecu. Power ranging from 400-500whp.
Last edited by Done; Feb 10, 2009 at 04:39 PM.
#44
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Should have left " twin scroll/ single scroll" out of the title. I dont think this turbo shootout is a waste of time. I think you will learn some interesting things. But from what I am reading here so far, comparing single scroll setups to TS here is a complete fail. When doing back to back comparisons it is pertinent to change only one variable. IE exhaust housing only, primary runner size only, turbo only. I have never seen a good test comparison of single scroll to twin scroll. And that is because it would be very time consuming to change only one variable at a time. I have seen plenty of graphs showing TS has the ability to spool a turbo faster. But non of those have shown the potential HP gain or loss compared to same turbo in perfected single scroll setup.
If Geoff knows that one manifold built for a twin scroll manifold will not perform as well one built for open scroll housings when paired with a twin scroll housing, why would you even bother testing the un-optimized parts. Geoff believes his product is good(best?), and also knows that in order to get the most out of each particular application everything has to be accounted for.
There is no such thing as a "perfect" test, all you can do is try your best to minimize and document conditions, and try to account/correct for the variables that are outside of your control. Full-Race makes manifolds for all types of cars in all flange configurations, sells the spread of turbos so I don't see how this test could be done in a much more controlled way by anybody more passionate about making cars go fast....
Scorke