JohnBradley's 2.2 long rod build
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
The same one I have had for a while, the FP3586.
Main changes from the 2.2 are the cams are larger now and the engine is a 9:1 2.4 instead of a 10:1 2.2 liter.
Main changes from the 2.2 are the cams are larger now and the engine is a 9:1 2.4 instead of a 10:1 2.2 liter.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Well technically that is correct, but I dont wanna seem like a badash. 
It spiked a little I guessed and then really did run pretty low. That is what it was doing on the 2.2 as well. It doesnt creep now like it did on the 2.2 which I find rather odd but I guess it works.

It spiked a little I guessed and then really did run pretty low. That is what it was doing on the 2.2 as well. It doesnt creep now like it did on the 2.2 which I find rather odd but I guess it works.
Thread Starter
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I'll post the log up tomorrow. I am gonna spend some time comparing where it is now at this boost level versus where the 2.2 was at. I already know the 2.0L was around 30psi to make it happen.
Mike called me out of the garage to have me come take a look.
I look forward to the 2.0L, 2.2L and 2.4L comparisons
Great work as always Aaron. Now go burn through a tank of 92 so you can put that Elove in!
I look forward to the 2.0L, 2.2L and 2.4L comparisons
Great work as always Aaron. Now go burn through a tank of 92 so you can put that Elove in!
Damn shorty love! Looks sick! The powerband is amazing and spools only 300pms slower than John's Black... Eric and I were just eye ****ing your graph on the phone for 30min
nothing but love. Congrats.
Mikey
nothing but love. Congrats.Mikey






