Anyone running pte 5857 and 6057 (reviews please)
560ish at 33psi is still very good. I believe I hit 530ish @ 35psi on MD, again on e85. What I've seen thus far is that the 5857 is still a nice turbo, but you gotta put this thing on kill mode. 93oct hit ~420whp @28psi... but the power didn't come one like I wanted or thought it would. But as soon as I put in e85 it was a rock solid 435whp at 28psi on base pull, but the power never fell off.. I also picked up 28tq.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggodU...eature=related
Last edited by EVO IXMR; Nov 6, 2010 at 07:50 PM.
Honestly that turbo is junk and a waste of money..As far as these dyno go there fairly to easy to adjust it to make it read ,also people keep the filtering on 60 to make it look smooth..I had my car on a mustang uncorrected with the same filtering and put it on a d.j on 0 smoothing and it looked like a polygraph test..
I personally only like dyno jets they basically all read the same .Still even of you did hit that on that dyno, you still should have fuel left.My friend made 700 whp on a dynojet with the same fuel system and still had a bit fuel left.
I personally only like dyno jets they basically all read the same .Still even of you did hit that on that dyno, you still should have fuel left.My friend made 700 whp on a dynojet with the same fuel system and still had a bit fuel left.
He had a bit of fuel left with what fuel? remember this is E85.
Every dyno is different, just like opinions. To say the turbo is crap because it doesn't make 900hp is flat out ignorant. The car was purpose built for road racing and will do well at that at this power level and powerband.
He had a bit of fuel left with what fuel? remember this is E85.
He had a bit of fuel left with what fuel? remember this is E85.
Ignorant why cause I expressed my opinion on this turbo??Im sorry but it's true...It's a horrible pump gas turbo but yes it is a great roadrace turbo due to its spooling..
It pulls strong and even though everyone says it about every dyno, this dyno does read low.
I still personally dont like it... my 3586 spools faster than the 5857 does by quite a bit which is in line with what i posted earlier in this thread...
And again, this dyno does NOT read low.
And again, this dyno does NOT read low.
Exactly At least someone agrees with me on this turbo and it's potential..Can you post you graph so we can see the spool up???I also heard the same about this dyno that it reads higher then other mustangs almost like dynojet numbers..
I dont want to get into an argument in this thread... i will simply say that there isn't anyone still in the area that was there when the dyno went into the ground aside from me, i have been on that dyno since day 1 when it use to read absolutely terrible if you wanted big numbers, and it got a reputation, which it still carries today, but doesn't read anything near like it use to.
My car hit 470/420 with no timing and no fuel up top. Since then, I have pulled the motor apart, rebuilt it, ported the head and I am still in my break in period. If all goes well, she may hit the dyno in 2 weeks when we head to VA for our tuning trips. Graphs will be posted for sure as I am pretty sure I am the only one in the country with my setup... HTA3586 TS T3 w/1.06 hotside. If you search you will see the first graph i posted. I'm not even subscribed to it anymore it was so long ago
My car hit 470/420 with no timing and no fuel up top. Since then, I have pulled the motor apart, rebuilt it, ported the head and I am still in my break in period. If all goes well, she may hit the dyno in 2 weeks when we head to VA for our tuning trips. Graphs will be posted for sure as I am pretty sure I am the only one in the country with my setup... HTA3586 TS T3 w/1.06 hotside. If you search you will see the first graph i posted. I'm not even subscribed to it anymore it was so long ago
They said they hit 475 on 28 psi but in the vid the plot says 35 psi..Also what's up with the red car they tuned drifting on the dyno???That graph was messy and to many spikes causing high hp numbers ..
I'm working on posting graphs... This thread was intended to give reviews, which opinions definitely matter. I wouldn't suggest this turbo to anyone searching for big numbers or quite honestly, not on pump gas. I think it blows on 93. e85 is the truth, hands down. Being that there are so little reviews I wanted to give some real information from my own experience.
The MD dyno reads as it reads. We are searching for another DJ around the area to start using it as a more suitable and consistent measure of power. That first graph that EVO IXMR posted was our first chance at tuning it on pump gas. Smoothing and everything else wasn't needed because it was meant to show progress, not final numbers. No excuse for the numbers, none needed. Graphs and videos are posted around evom already for the Force-Fed Performance / Epic Dyno day. Hope that helps.
The MD dyno reads as it reads. We are searching for another DJ around the area to start using it as a more suitable and consistent measure of power. That first graph that EVO IXMR posted was our first chance at tuning it on pump gas. Smoothing and everything else wasn't needed because it was meant to show progress, not final numbers. No excuse for the numbers, none needed. Graphs and videos are posted around evom already for the Force-Fed Performance / Epic Dyno day. Hope that helps.
I'm working on posting graphs... This thread was intended to give reviews, which opinions definitely matter. I wouldn't suggest this turbo to anyone searching for big numbers or quite honestly, not on pump gas. I think it blows on 93. e85 is the truth, hands down. Being that there are so little reviews I wanted to give some real information from my own experience.
The MD dyno reads as it reads. We are searching for another DJ around the area to start using it as a more suitable and consistent measure of power. That first graph that EVO IXMR posted was our first chance at tuning it on pump gas. Smoothing and everything else wasn't needed because it was meant to show progress, not final numbers. No excuse for the numbers, none needed. Graphs and videos are posted around evom already for the Force-Fed Performance / Epic Dyno day. Hope that helps.
The MD dyno reads as it reads. We are searching for another DJ around the area to start using it as a more suitable and consistent measure of power. That first graph that EVO IXMR posted was our first chance at tuning it on pump gas. Smoothing and everything else wasn't needed because it was meant to show progress, not final numbers. No excuse for the numbers, none needed. Graphs and videos are posted around evom already for the Force-Fed Performance / Epic Dyno day. Hope that helps.
The car feels awesome on the street. I run on the street at about 35psi. Not sure about the numbers, but at this point it doesn't matter. It comes on strong and stays there. The turbo seems to react best around the 34-38psi (depending on mods) on e85. Pump gas was only good to about 28-30ish. I purchased this turbo to hopefully be able to go between 93 and ethanol. I'm not sure if I'll ever go back to pump gas in this car, regardless of what kit I have on it. The 5857 is better than a 30r, and we'll see about reliability as time goes along. This is a good DD turbo for that guy who doesn't feel like rebuilding it after a year or two of pushing it bit. That is an opinion. After seeing quite a few journal bearing turbo's dying after only a year, but making the same or more power, I'd personally go this route.
