New BW EFR Turbo Thread
I'll get some charts up- but one of our RB-X test cars did as follows:
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
The idea would be for the actuator to be in the pull position to close so if something goes south, theoretically, it would relax and the default position would be open. Would make sense to do it this way. But unlike the IWG flapper, this flapper valve is anchored at two points so if there is any movement in the alloy (which is a distinct possibility with alloys as heat expansion and distortion is much greater then ductile iron) it can get stuck in a certain position as alignment becomes lost on thin walled castings.
I'll get some charts up- but one of our RB-X test cars did as follows:
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
Pretty sure 93 octane, Dave.
I think your Mustang Ecoboost EFR7163 was Single Scroll T3 frame?
Seems that they both are pulling the same #s on essentially same fuel- you mixed to get 94 octane.
I think your Mustang Ecoboost EFR7163 was Single Scroll T3 frame?
Seems that they both are pulling the same #s on essentially same fuel- you mixed to get 94 octane.
I'll get some charts up- but one of our RB-X test cars did as follows:
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
2006 EVO IX
Mods:
Stock Cams, CBRD FMIC, Injen Intake, CBRD LICP (comes with kit), CBRD UICP with stock battery, PTE1000cc w/255lph, High Flow Cat, Catback
26 psi netted 401whp/332wtq- on the 7163- in 90 degree heat and high humidity- the same car was around 329whp at 25.5 psi on the stock turbo-
changes were RBX kit only (manifold/turbo/downpipe)- peak torque in 3rd gear is right at 4000rpm- so about 685rpm slower than the stock turbo- however the transient response is very impressive-
Ill get some plots up! Cant wait to test on a built motor or some other fuel-
cb
Hi Chad,
Just as a comparo, what would a BB Red or BBK-B do around similar boost pressures on your dyno on the same fuel. Just curious.
it will work fine, same as small A/R 0.48. restrictive.







