Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New AEM 50-1000 320 lph fuel pump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 09:30 AM
  #76  
hokiruu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
Originally Posted by Remy
Wow.. I have 3,000 miles on mine. 27psi on a red . No problems but I'm running 93.
Well since my Walbro that was fine for 30k miles died after 5k miles of E85, and this AEM that replaced it lasted less than 1000 miles, I think it may not be the pump's fault. I don't know what is though.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 11:08 PM
  #77  
hokiruu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
Replaced AEM 320lph with DW300, still hard wired of course. Worth noting that it also does not make "priming sound." It runs, but not well at high load/low rpm above ~12psi. Acts like misfire, runs lean. Think I need re-tune. this is bugging the hell out of me but I haven' had time to set up my new computer to log.

What causes:
Low RPM, high gear lean AFR, "misfire" symptoms but otherwise runs well off boost? Plugs have been replaced with new NKG copper heat range 7 just to check, gapped down incrementally from .024 to .019. These replaced~8k iridiums gapped to .019 by tuner and ran fine until recently, looked fine. Problems persist.

Stumped.

Last edited by hokiruu; Mar 21, 2013 at 11:12 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 11:37 PM
  #78  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by hokiruu
Replaced AEM 320lph with DW300, still hard wired of course. Worth noting that it also does not make "priming sound." It runs, but not well at high load/low rpm above ~12psi. Acts like misfire, runs lean. Think I need re-tune. this is bugging the hell out of me but I haven' had time to set up my new computer to log.

What causes:
Low RPM, high gear lean AFR, "misfire" symptoms but otherwise runs well off boost? Plugs have been replaced with new NKG copper heat range 7 just to check, gapped down incrementally from .024 to .019. These replaced~8k iridiums gapped to .019 by tuner and ran fine until recently, looked fine. Problems persist.

Stumped.
seems like the grommet that seals the pump nozzle to the pump carrier might be leaking badly.

also, what fuel, what injectors, and what injector scaling?
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2013 | 11:43 PM
  #79  
hokiruu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
Mrfred, I feel lucky to have you subscribed and replying, thank you. This is all on E85, FIC1100 high impedance, I don't know injector scaling, was tuned by Sean @ FFTEC. You think the leaking pump to carrier could be the culprit? I should probably check the FP and put the stock pickup sock back on since it just came in.
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2013 | 12:03 AM
  #80  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by hokiruu
Mrfred, I feel lucky to have you subscribed and replying, thank you. This is all on E85, FIC1100 high impedance, I don't know injector scaling, was tuned by Sean @ FFTEC. You think the leaking pump to carrier could be the culprit? I should probably check the FP and put the stock pickup sock back on since it just came in.
if the tune is good and the pump is working, then its either the grommet, is not sealing, the fuel filter in the pump carrier is clogged, the fuel sock is clogged, or the fpr has failed. i've nefer heard of the latter most item. my guess is one of the first three.
Reply
Old Apr 2, 2013 | 09:36 PM
  #81  
detroit pistins's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (102)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,173
Likes: 19
From: Detroit
What other pumps are stock replacements? also thanks for sharing the info on the 4runner fp sock.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2013 | 12:55 AM
  #82  
hokiruu's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: Truckee, CA
There are SO many now compared to 3-4 years ago. Just looks through MAP's selection.
I am now running a Deatchworks DW301. I also installed a Spoolinup COP and gapped BR7EIX to .022. I'm finally settling in to my new garage so when I get a minute I hope to solve a nasty boost leak that is causing problems. In the meantime, my Tacoma's tranny blew. Tough couple months!
Reply
Old May 1, 2013 | 06:20 PM
  #83  
gpfury86's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 681
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis
Has anybody been hammering this fuel pressure release port spring down like on the wally 255's so it can't pop off? Or does this not work the same on this pump?


Name:  IMG_19431_zps0e0de0e9.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  53.0 KB
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2013 | 04:35 PM
  #84  
gt50's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: LA
I installed the AEM pump on my car today because I plan on doing some mods in the near future. I have owned the car for six years, so it came as a surprise to me that I already had a walbro gss342. After a few minutes of pondering whether to sell the AEM and walbro install kit, I continued with the install.

I had an issue with the pump not priming afterwards. After many attempts to start, I tried simply putting fuel into a container with the pump. After a few attempts, there was no fuel coming out.

I pulled the housing apart again to check everything. I found that there is a small hole on the bottom of the pump that is not on the walbro. I had used the rubber insulator that came with the walbro install kit on my AEM pump. The walbro insulator is very thick and completely blocked this hole. The AEM insulator has a hole cut into it that matches to the hole on the pump. Unfortunately it did not fit under the plastic cap.

At this point I thought I might have to drill through the rubber to get this to work. I took a look at the stock insulator that was on the car. It had some additional spacing around the edges which looked like it should do the job. I dropped the assembly in the tank and cranked it and a little gas came out. After connecting everything, the car started within 5 seconds on the first crank.

The walbro version on the left, the AEM on the right.
New AEM 50-1000 320 lph fuel pump-qumk1hd.jpg
Reply
Old Jun 24, 2013 | 07:25 PM
  #85  
DisgustipatedM3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
So... is the pump working good? Updates? AFR's?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2013 | 04:11 PM
  #86  
rtype16's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
One update is AEM just released their E85 compatible fuel pump. Part #50-1200. Same dimensions and flow as their other pump. A little bit more expensive, but not by much and they say it is compatible with 100% Ethanol, 100% Methanol and Gasoline Blends. The internals are designed specifically Alcohol blends where the other one was not.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2013 | 05:08 PM
  #87  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by rtype16
One update is AEM just released their E85 compatible fuel pump. Part #50-1200. Same dimensions and flow as their other pump. A little bit more expensive, but not by much and they say it is compatible with 100% Ethanol, 100% Methanol and Gasoline Blends. The internals are designed specifically Alcohol blends where the other one was not.
I thought that the original was advertised as E85-compatible.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2013 | 11:26 AM
  #88  
rtype16's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
It is compatible, but will diminish the life of the pump since it was not designed for the non lubricating properties of E85. Most people will say they are compatible, but diminish life of the pump. The new one was designed specifically for 100% alcohol.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 03:39 PM
  #89  
DisgustipatedM3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, CA
So nobody has tested the new "E85-proof" version? I guess compatible means 'it'll work, but will die quicker'? LOL

I'm tempted to test this and see if their claims hold up. If it supports 500-550 whp dynojet on E85, I'd much rather drop it in than do all the work for a Walbro 416.
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2013 | 04:43 PM
  #90  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by DisgustipatedM3
So nobody has tested the new "E85-proof" version? I guess compatible means 'it'll work, but will die quicker'? LOL

I'm tempted to test this and see if their claims hold up. If it supports 500-550 whp dynojet on E85, I'd much rather drop it in than do all the work for a Walbro 416.
It won't get you there. It can do maybe 500 whp at best when providing the intended fuel rail pressure. Now just like people have done for the Walbro 255, it can be run past its limit, and you could make up for the loss of target fuel pressure by running large injectors and bit IDCs. Then maybe it could do 525 whp or some such thing, but its not the way to do it.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:58 PM.