Road & Track: EVO IX MR vs. WRX STI
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
no matter what the magazines say.. in real life once the mods start being added the subaru gets blown away due to its thin walled aluminum block 2.5 without a closed deck. Untill they give the usdm market a more equal engine to the 4g63 the subaru will always be the 2nd best option.
Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25. The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.
If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Originally Posted by VOLFLO
thanks i didnt have a good feeling about that either. So i will hopefully get a quote tomorrow. is there anything i should really be aware of? Whats the story about MA being government regulated when it comes to insurance rates?
humm... that is a built motor isnt it?? i havent seen any USDM STIs making 500-600 whp with stock internals. Evos do it all the time. If you build and sleve a motor any motor will make power. Most sits i have seen have issues @ 400 whp. Just look at the number of 10 sec evos with just gt35r turbo kit and full interior. It cant be done on the STI with stock block. Hell people are running mid 11s with stock turbo on the evo. Ive never heard of an STi getting into 11s on stock block and stock turbo. Correct me if i am wrong.
Last edited by Vishnu_Evo8; Nov 13, 2005 at 06:15 PM.
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
no matter what the magazines say.. in real life once the mods start being added the subaru gets blown away due to its thin walled aluminum block 2.5 without a closed deck. Untill they give the usdm market a more equal engine to the 4g63 the subaru will always be the 2nd best option.
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
The EJ25 isn't nearly as good as the 4g63?
Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25.
The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.
If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25. The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.
If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
They had to have screwed up driving the STI. The motortrend article I saw had them both at 4.5 seconds 0-60. The EVO got a 13.3 1/4, and the STI got a 13.0. Just depends on driver or they got a crappy test car.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Luckily, the numbers aren't like that when _we_ drive them at the track. It's a shame that the limiter issue is completely skewing the numbers in the magazine. This misleads people into thinking the Evo isn't as fast as it really is. I think the driver needs to learn how to cut 1.7 60's off the 5k limiter before providing actual test times. Once he learns how, then do the tests, and you'll see MUCH different numbers.
Last edited by EVO Neil; Nov 13, 2005 at 09:13 PM.
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
The EJ25 isn't nearly as good as the 4g63?
Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25.
The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.
If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25. The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.
If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Originally Posted by burningmoney97
evo wins at road and track
but not in motor trend
but not in motor trend
Originally Posted by TEH FASTR EVO
I GUARANTEE a 4G63 will hold more power then the EJ25, GUARANTEE. That block is nowhere near as strong, all aluminum, and not a closed deck. Try to make 550WHP on a 100% stock bottom end, just try it 

As for the Big Valley motor being "built," so what? It's an EJ25. I don't see stock 4g63s putting out 700+ hp either, so your point is what? Once you get into big hp #s, it's all about who has the most money.
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
As I've told people before, we usually make five runs in a vehicle and then move on the the next because of the high number of vehicles we test (300 vehicles/50 weeks). I'd still challenge that many or most of the drivers couldn't get those numbers in five runs on a vehicle they've never driven before.
It's just unfortunate that such low numbers are being posted in such a widely-read magazine, when we know they're not factual in terms of what the car REALLY does.
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
Give me the cash, and I will.
As for the Big Valley motor being "built," so what? It's an EJ25. I don't see stock 4g63s putting out 700+ hp either, so your point is what? Once you get into big hp #s, it's all about who has the most money.
As for the Big Valley motor being "built," so what? It's an EJ25. I don't see stock 4g63s putting out 700+ hp either, so your point is what? Once you get into big hp #s, it's all about who has the most money.
No body is flaming the STI. It is a great car. But its engine has more limits stock than the 4g63 does.


