Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Road & Track: EVO IX MR vs. WRX STI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #76  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
no matter what the magazines say.. in real life once the mods start being added the subaru gets blown away due to its thin walled aluminum block 2.5 without a closed deck. Untill they give the usdm market a more equal engine to the 4g63 the subaru will always be the 2nd best option.
The EJ25 isn't nearly as good as the 4g63? Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25.

The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.

If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #77  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by VOLFLO
thanks i didnt have a good feeling about that either. So i will hopefully get a quote tomorrow. is there anything i should really be aware of? Whats the story about MA being government regulated when it comes to insurance rates?
I can't help ya there, Bro. If you're married though, I think Progressive's rates are pretty decent. I've been with State Farm for nearly 15 years, and even with discounts and whatnot, Progressive was slightly cheaper than what State Farm is. The only reason I bother to stay with State Farm is because I have my home owner insurance with them as well.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 06:06 PM
  #78  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
humm... that is a built motor isnt it?? i havent seen any USDM STIs making 500-600 whp with stock internals. Evos do it all the time. If you build and sleve a motor any motor will make power. Most sits i have seen have issues @ 400 whp. Just look at the number of 10 sec evos with just gt35r turbo kit and full interior. It cant be done on the STI with stock block. Hell people are running mid 11s with stock turbo on the evo. Ive never heard of an STi getting into 11s on stock block and stock turbo. Correct me if i am wrong.

Last edited by Vishnu_Evo8; Nov 13, 2005 at 06:15 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #79  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
no matter what the magazines say.. in real life once the mods start being added the subaru gets blown away due to its thin walled aluminum block 2.5 without a closed deck. Untill they give the usdm market a more equal engine to the 4g63 the subaru will always be the 2nd best option.
If the rumor is true that the 4g63 will be replaced when the EVO X debuts, then both the Sube and the EVO will have an all aluminum and possibly open deck design. I really hope that Mitsu sticks with the 4g63.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #80  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
The EJ25 isn't nearly as good as the 4g63? Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25.

The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.

If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
Is the EJ25 open deck or closed deck design? In a turbo set-up an open deck designed engine can not be as good as a closed deck design. That is why most honda engines are sleeved when they go turbo.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #81  
evonsx Jr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: Lenexa, KS
They had to have screwed up driving the STI. The motortrend article I saw had them both at 4.5 seconds 0-60. The EVO got a 13.3 1/4, and the STI got a 13.0. Just depends on driver or they got a crappy test car.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:51 PM
  #82  
SRJ's Avatar
SRJ
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: KCMO
Regardless of who's numbers the suby looks like sh**!!!
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #83  
EVO Neil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 831
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Luckily, the numbers aren't like that when _we_ drive them at the track. It's a shame that the limiter issue is completely skewing the numbers in the magazine. This misleads people into thinking the Evo isn't as fast as it really is. I think the driver needs to learn how to cut 1.7 60's off the 5k limiter before providing actual test times. Once he learns how, then do the tests, and you'll see MUCH different numbers.
As I've told people before, we usually make five runs in a vehicle and then move on the the next because of the high number of vehicles we test (300 vehicles/50 weeks). I'd still challenge that many or most of the drivers couldn't get those numbers in five runs on a vehicle they've never driven before.

Last edited by EVO Neil; Nov 13, 2005 at 09:13 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #84  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
the the ej 25 is a open deck.. aluminum block.. hence the fact that its weaker. its a fact.. there is no way anyoen can say the ej 25 is as good as a 4g63 stock for stock.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 09:13 PM
  #85  
TEH FASTR EVO's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
The EJ25 isn't nearly as good as the 4g63? Just ask Big Valley what they think of the EJ25.

The EJ25's major downside is the cast pistons. Other than that, it's a perfectly good setup.

If you're going to make claims, make truthful ones.
I GUARANTEE a 4G63 will hold more power then the EJ25, GUARANTEE. That block is nowhere near as strong, all aluminum, and not a closed deck. Try to make 550WHP on a 100% stock bottom end, just try it
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2005 | 09:18 PM
  #86  
deffro's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
From: georgia
Originally Posted by burningmoney97
evo wins at road and track
but not in motor trend
I must agree, both magazines still have the ratings as neck and neck. One chose the Evo and the other chose the STI. But both agreed, it all comes down to what the person likes better. Neither gave significant advantage to either car. My friends.... it is still what one person likes over the other. But i think we know where we all stand
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 02:24 AM
  #87  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
well i guess he knows hes wrong now.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 06:24 AM
  #88  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by TEH FASTR EVO
I GUARANTEE a 4G63 will hold more power then the EJ25, GUARANTEE. That block is nowhere near as strong, all aluminum, and not a closed deck. Try to make 550WHP on a 100% stock bottom end, just try it
Give me the cash, and I will.

As for the Big Valley motor being "built," so what? It's an EJ25. I don't see stock 4g63s putting out 700+ hp either, so your point is what? Once you get into big hp #s, it's all about who has the most money.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 06:28 AM
  #89  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by EVO Neil
As I've told people before, we usually make five runs in a vehicle and then move on the the next because of the high number of vehicles we test (300 vehicles/50 weeks). I'd still challenge that many or most of the drivers couldn't get those numbers in five runs on a vehicle they've never driven before.
Well, I got a 13.1 @ 104 on my first try in the 05 MR, so it's definitely doable. You're right that most people can't/don't do that, but your answer here does not touch on my suggestion. I said the driver should be given more opportunities just to figure out how to launch with a 5k limiter. That's nothing like just trying to launch a new car...it's completely different since it doesn't allow you to get to the proper launch rpm and requires a special technique. He obviously didn't figure it out, because a 105.9mph trap speed is good for 12.6-12.7 if driven properly. I personally ran 12.64 @ 106.00 in my 05 with a few mods. If I was making 105.9mph in stock form, that would have been a 12.7 or so, but only with the 5k limiter disconnected, since I've never learned to launch with the 5k limiter.

It's just unfortunate that such low numbers are being posted in such a widely-read magazine, when we know they're not factual in terms of what the car REALLY does.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2005 | 07:09 AM
  #90  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
Give me the cash, and I will.

As for the Big Valley motor being "built," so what? It's an EJ25. I don't see stock 4g63s putting out 700+ hp either, so your point is what? Once you get into big hp #s, it's all about who has the most money.
We are talking about STOCK bottom end and maximum HP. We know that the 4g63 is IRON block and CLOSED DECK. The EJ25 is all aluminum and semi-closed deck. There is no way in hell that the Sube block can hold as much power as the Mitsu block. These are FACTS that no matter how loyal to Sube you are will not change.

No body is flaming the STI. It is a great car. But its engine has more limits stock than the 4g63 does.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:30 PM.