Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Project EVO 9 begins..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:41 PM
  #91  
autoplus's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Philippines
Hi Warrtalon! We are Autoplus from the Philippines and the premier tuning shop in this little country. We had been tuning Evos since 1996 since the Evo IV had been incepted to pur showrooms and just to give u a little bit of our history and experiences with Evos, the choice of parts of Evasive are the same choice of parts we use too, and they all perfectly work well on evos, especially on the CP9A models. The GT3037 was used on some of our Evo 5 customers and they got an average of 550awhp. Not bad?! Our Tanto Racing Evo 5 used HKS all the way up to the F-Con Pro and hit a 10.76@134mph! Now I do not really know if the HKS 3037 is not well liked in this community but if it aint, i am respecting everyones opinion, but based on our experience, they are perfect. it depends really on what the owner wants. To be honest, the only US Turbokit for Evos we recommend to our customers are the AMS turbokits, in fact, we are now thinking if we should sponsor a trip for Martin Musial to come here.

And just for your added information, I had seen Nissan Skylines run 9seconds lower on HKS twin GT3037 turbokits. Our GTR made a whopping 857whp on only 2 bar and we are going for another dynorun in 2006. the turbos with use are twin HKS 3240s.

Im not bashing you here, but I am just providing you additional information. If you want to check out our cars, go to https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=165956

Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I can do that. I don't think the parts won't work; I just am not fond of the turbo being used. I certainly understand the point of seeing how well the car responds to HKS parts, but I just wonder who thought it up. There would be FAR MORE to gain by putting all HKS parts on a IX with stock turbo and stock ECU than going with a turbo that isn't well-liked in the Evo community and a tuning device that no one knows how to use. If the goal is just to prove something to yourself, SPE, or HKS, then I understand. If the point is to ultimately show the Evo community how well HKS products work and make money, then I think it's a big waste of time and someone is missing the boat, since most owners won't be touching the turbo or the ECU.

Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see what happens, since it will be a different combo that no one else will probably be using.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #92  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by Steiner
Out of curiosity, how did you come to choose the 3037 over the 3076 or 3071?
you didn't notice? it's all hks stuff....
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 08:58 PM
  #93  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
Originally Posted by honda-guy
the majority power increase of the IX over the VIII is largely due to larger turbo, mivec, and maybe better fuel map. since the turbo and ecu will be replace, that makes the mivec system the only difference between the two gen. since mivec only adjust cam timing, not lift or duration, it's possible to set up the evo viii cam timing to match the mivec cam timing at peak hp if you are only looking for peak hp, but the viii will not match the iv in power under the curve due to the mivec ability to adjust cam timing on the fly to maximize power in a wider rpm range.
cam timing is duration... it's duration of overlap... which is what you're concerned with when you get cams. the actual duration of the start and the end of the valve events can't really be changed cuz yer piston is in the way. hence the diration is all in the overlap regions.
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2005 | 09:17 PM
  #94  
new_B's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
From: Worst place on Earth!
subscribing....
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 03:27 AM
  #95  
Abicus's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
From: Bellingham, WA
I'm also interested in your stock IX turbo. PM me.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 03:28 AM
  #96  
jdmitr's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
simply amazing..
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 04:27 AM
  #97  
PurgeIt's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: All Over SoCal
I'm curious to know how the V-Pro is going to be wired up considering there's no harness available from HKS yet... no one seems to have any idea on how to do that (there's even a current thread about harness pin-outs for the IX)... also, how will the V-Pro deal with Mivec? The latest V-Pro release is 3.2, for which there's no mention of dealing with Mitsu's variable cam system. From what I do remember reading in the HKS master catalog, there is something available from HKS for the RB's cam system but not even a peep about VTEC, let alone MIVEC. Some thoughts from Evasive would be appreciated.

Last edited by PurgeIt; Dec 17, 2005 at 04:32 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 05:24 AM
  #98  
Derek888's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (54)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 1
From: Taipei
Originally Posted by PurgeIt
I'm curious to know how the V-Pro is going to be wired up considering there's no harness available from HKS yet... no one seems to have any idea on how to do that (there's even a current thread about harness pin-outs for the IX)... also, how will the V-Pro deal with Mivec? The latest V-Pro release is 3.2, for which there's no mention of dealing with Mitsu's variable cam system. From what I do remember reading in the HKS master catalog, there is something available from HKS for the RB's cam system but not even a peep about VTEC, let alone MIVEC. Some thoughts from Evasive would be appreciated.
The Vpro is a universal ems thats compatible with all japanese cars... I guess you wont know until you try it out. My tuner over here has hooked up a Vpro on a bmw 3 series so if your familiar with anything can happen.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #99  
Ang Wen Yan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 1
From: KL,Malaysia
In taiwan,almost every car can install V Pro.Include Ford Focus,Ford Tierra RS,Bimmer.....etc,etc
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 10:04 AM
  #100  
Evasive EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (78)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: City of Industry, CA
purgeit.. we have the harness from evo VIII for the vpro. We will have pictures and a write up on the difference between 8 and 9 harness.. and what modifications are required to make it work.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 11:47 AM
  #101  
PurgeIt's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: All Over SoCal
Originally Posted by Evasive EVO
purgeit.. we have the harness from evo VIII for the vpro. We will have pictures and a write up on the difference between 8 and 9 harness.. and what modifications are required to make it work.
Alright. I'm looking forward to seeing how this will be done. Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #102  
honda-guy's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 3,589
Likes: 37
From: Central PA
Originally Posted by trinydex
cam timing is duration... it's duration of overlap... which is what you're concerned with when you get cams. the actual duration of the start and the end of the valve events can't really be changed cuz yer piston is in the way. hence the diration is all in the overlap regions.
i was talking about cam duration as in the length of time the valves stay open and the mivec system on the Evo does not have such feature. low compression boosted engine usually have very good piston clearance, so increase cam duration is really not going to create any clearance problems with the valves like it would on a high compression NA engines with dome pistons. as far as cam overlap, you don't want too much of that in a boosted engine because boost leak out off the cylinder.

Last edited by honda-guy; Dec 17, 2005 at 11:34 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #103  
fitbikedominick's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
From: Greenbay
i will be dumping all my money into my ash grey 9 this spring and i really am looking forward to this build up. I want mine to be daily drivable and around 450 awhp im sure your project will show much more hp than mine ever will. Keep us posted
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #104  
import_speedzz's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
From: Austin Texas
man im just goin to shut up not like the other posters... haha... you guys are the pros and alot of brains combined there.. im sure about that... hope to see the finish product soon.. any exterior additions by the way?
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 08:37 PM
  #105  
shimla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 3
From: chi area
are u selling the stock turbo?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:54 AM.