Project EVO 9 begins..
Hi Warrtalon! We are Autoplus from the Philippines and the premier tuning shop in this little country. We had been tuning Evos since 1996 since the Evo IV had been incepted to pur showrooms and just to give u a little bit of our history and experiences with Evos, the choice of parts of Evasive are the same choice of parts we use too, and they all perfectly work well on evos, especially on the CP9A models. The GT3037 was used on some of our Evo 5 customers and they got an average of 550awhp. Not bad?! Our Tanto Racing Evo 5 used HKS all the way up to the F-Con Pro and hit a 10.76@134mph! Now I do not really know if the HKS 3037 is not well liked in this community but if it aint, i am respecting everyones opinion, but based on our experience, they are perfect. it depends really on what the owner wants. To be honest, the only US Turbokit for Evos we recommend to our customers are the AMS turbokits, in fact, we are now thinking if we should sponsor a trip for Martin Musial to come here.
And just for your added information, I had seen Nissan Skylines run 9seconds lower on HKS twin GT3037 turbokits. Our GTR made a whopping 857whp on only 2 bar and we are going for another dynorun in 2006. the turbos with use are twin HKS 3240s.
Im not bashing you here, but I am just providing you additional information. If you want to check out our cars, go to https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=165956
And just for your added information, I had seen Nissan Skylines run 9seconds lower on HKS twin GT3037 turbokits. Our GTR made a whopping 857whp on only 2 bar and we are going for another dynorun in 2006. the turbos with use are twin HKS 3240s.
Im not bashing you here, but I am just providing you additional information. If you want to check out our cars, go to https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=165956
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I can do that. I don't think the parts won't work; I just am not fond of the turbo being used. I certainly understand the point of seeing how well the car responds to HKS parts, but I just wonder who thought it up. There would be FAR MORE to gain by putting all HKS parts on a IX with stock turbo and stock ECU than going with a turbo that isn't well-liked in the Evo community and a tuning device that no one knows how to use. If the goal is just to prove something to yourself, SPE, or HKS, then I understand. If the point is to ultimately show the Evo community how well HKS products work and make money, then I think it's a big waste of time and someone is missing the boat, since most owners won't be touching the turbo or the ECU.
Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see what happens, since it will be a different combo that no one else will probably be using.
Nevertheless, it will be interesting to see what happens, since it will be a different combo that no one else will probably be using.
Originally Posted by honda-guy
the majority power increase of the IX over the VIII is largely due to larger turbo, mivec, and maybe better fuel map. since the turbo and ecu will be replace, that makes the mivec system the only difference between the two gen. since mivec only adjust cam timing, not lift or duration, it's possible to set up the evo viii cam timing to match the mivec cam timing at peak hp if you are only looking for peak hp, but the viii will not match the iv in power under the curve due to the mivec ability to adjust cam timing on the fly to maximize power in a wider rpm range.
I'm curious to know how the V-Pro is going to be wired up considering there's no harness available from HKS yet... no one seems to have any idea on how to do that (there's even a current thread about harness pin-outs for the IX)... also, how will the V-Pro deal with Mivec? The latest V-Pro release is 3.2, for which there's no mention of dealing with Mitsu's variable cam system. From what I do remember reading in the HKS master catalog, there is something available from HKS for the RB's cam system but not even a peep about VTEC, let alone MIVEC. Some thoughts from Evasive would be appreciated.
Last edited by PurgeIt; Dec 17, 2005 at 04:32 AM.
Originally Posted by PurgeIt
I'm curious to know how the V-Pro is going to be wired up considering there's no harness available from HKS yet... no one seems to have any idea on how to do that (there's even a current thread about harness pin-outs for the IX)... also, how will the V-Pro deal with Mivec? The latest V-Pro release is 3.2, for which there's no mention of dealing with Mitsu's variable cam system. From what I do remember reading in the HKS master catalog, there is something available from HKS for the RB's cam system but not even a peep about VTEC, let alone MIVEC. Some thoughts from Evasive would be appreciated.
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (78)
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: City of Industry, CA
purgeit.. we have the harness from evo VIII for the vpro. We will have pictures and a write up on the difference between 8 and 9 harness.. and what modifications are required to make it work.
Originally Posted by Evasive EVO
purgeit.. we have the harness from evo VIII for the vpro. We will have pictures and a write up on the difference between 8 and 9 harness.. and what modifications are required to make it work.
Originally Posted by trinydex
cam timing is duration... it's duration of overlap... which is what you're concerned with when you get cams. the actual duration of the start and the end of the valve events can't really be changed cuz yer piston is in the way. hence the diration is all in the overlap regions.
Last edited by honda-guy; Dec 17, 2005 at 11:34 PM.
i will be dumping all my money into my ash grey 9 this spring and i really am looking forward to this build up. I want mine to be daily drivable and around 450 awhp im sure your project will show much more hp than mine ever will. Keep us posted
man im just goin to shut up not like the other posters... haha... you guys are the pros and alot of brains combined there.. im sure about that... hope to see the finish product soon.. any exterior additions by the way?


