Fully built HKS Evo with $20000 just runs high11's
#1
Fully built HKS Evo with $20000 just runs high11's
I don't know if you guys noticed but the car magazine Modified has a first page Evo special with a fully built HKS Evo.
Among the most significant mods this car has a 2.3 l motor by HKS and a Turbokit from HKS as well and a long list of aftermarket mods that in my quick estimation it runs above $20000 however they managed a humble 11.87sec 1/4 mile.
It just caught my attention that a big manufacturer like HKS fell short to provide a "fast" car specially considering the amount of money they put into. Many people ran high 11's with budgets bellow $1500. This HKS Evo put down more than 450whp..are they choosing bad drivers for these type of test?
Here is the link:
https://www.evolutionm.net/misc/modified.php
If you have the time , please stop in a store and read the magazine.
Carlos
Among the most significant mods this car has a 2.3 l motor by HKS and a Turbokit from HKS as well and a long list of aftermarket mods that in my quick estimation it runs above $20000 however they managed a humble 11.87sec 1/4 mile.
It just caught my attention that a big manufacturer like HKS fell short to provide a "fast" car specially considering the amount of money they put into. Many people ran high 11's with budgets bellow $1500. This HKS Evo put down more than 450whp..are they choosing bad drivers for these type of test?
Here is the link:
https://www.evolutionm.net/misc/modified.php
If you have the time , please stop in a store and read the magazine.
Carlos
Last edited by fromWRXtoEVO; Dec 29, 2006 at 09:37 AM.
#2
#6
I still think is kind of a shame 1/4 mile wise. I am not complaining about power, I think they made decent power, I am saying these guys has no business in 1/4 mile competition..that for sure..
Carlos
Trending Topics
#8
Turbokit= at least $3000
full HKS exhaust= at least $1000
HKS IC = $900 or more plus piping
HKS 680 cc injcetors= $500
2.3 motor= at least $4000 or 5000
I am sure I am missing a lot of other engine mods. Trust me, too many engine mods. It is clear they fell short on 1/4 mile times no matter what angle you look at it.
Carlos
Last edited by fromWRXtoEVO; Dec 29, 2006 at 10:03 AM.
#13
the MPH was somewhere between 113 and 117mph but I am not exactly sure. One more time, they fell reallly short performance wise. I am sure they had all freaking day to launch that car over and over until they obtained that number.
If I am the HKS manager I would be a bit ashame of those numbers with such power. I am sure they are also running their own HKS reenforced clutch.
I want to make clear though that despite the low numbers HKS is a heck of a manufacturer and perhaps one of the elite in the world.
my .2c
Carlos
If I am the HKS manager I would be a bit ashame of those numbers with such power. I am sure they are also running their own HKS reenforced clutch.
I want to make clear though that despite the low numbers HKS is a heck of a manufacturer and perhaps one of the elite in the world.
my .2c
Carlos
#14
Evolving Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: DA P!!!
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.hksusa.com/info/?id=2957
It was built for road course and I think when it ran those numbers it was done on pump according to C&D rules for the superfour challange.
I bet with a few tweaks it would be faster.
It was built for road course and I think when it ran those numbers it was done on pump according to C&D rules for the superfour challange.
I bet with a few tweaks it would be faster.
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 2,679
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.hksusa.com/info/?id=2957
It was built for road course and I think when it ran those numbers it was done on pump according to C&D rules for the superfour challange.
I bet with a few tweaks it would be faster.
It was built for road course and I think when it ran those numbers it was done on pump according to C&D rules for the superfour challange.
I bet with a few tweaks it would be faster.