Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

305whp Thats It??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:09 PM
  #31  
SilverStreak's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
While we're on the topic of the IX putting down better numbers with the same mods, what would be the best guess of what you could expect from a IX with the same mods?

I agree with the others who stated these numbers are about on par with DynoDynamics or MustangDyno.

If these numbers are from a Dynojet, I would have to believe there is an underyling problem, such as a boost leak or a poor tune.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:11 PM
  #32  
Bo'sEvo8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Boost was set at 21.5psi I think but, on the defi gauge in my car is says 1.5 I thought that was equivalent to 22psi..dunno but, yea 21.5
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:23 PM
  #33  
teg_fan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, Pa
1.5 bar = 22.05 psi

edit: modyp is right
onlineconversion.com

Last edited by teg_fan; Jan 2, 2007 at 01:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #34  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
1 bar = 14.5037738 pounds per square inch
So he is at 21.755 psi ~ 1.5 bar.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #35  
TxEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: DFW
seems low to me, and as stated befroe, it could be any number of things or combinations of factors..
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:29 PM
  #36  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by SilverStreak
While we're on the topic of the IX putting down better numbers with the same mods, what would be the best guess of what you could expect from a IX with the same mods.
No, we are not on that topic.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #37  
Kerr's Avatar
Fomer Vendor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
From: Central FL
I had almost the exact mods as you, minus the injectors, and on CFT's Mustang dyno I did 337hp/339tq. And mine was tuned by Jestr .

How much boost are you running?

(And I know of the "issue" with CFT's dyno, but I don't exactly what it is, that it doesn't read like a normal Mustang dyno or something.)

Edit:

And as a reference, I dynoed 246hp/247tq on the same dyno stock w/ k&n drop in.

Last edited by Kerr; Jan 2, 2007 at 01:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:34 PM
  #38  
Bo'sEvo8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
Well, from what I recall I think AMS said their dyno is pretty accurate..So I guess 301whp is my whp# don't matter though I can still keep up with a 500hp C6 vette!!
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #39  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by Bo'sEvo8
Boost was set at 21.5psi I think but, on the defi gauge in my car is says 1.5 I thought that was equivalent to 22psi..dunno but, yea 21.5
I dynoed at 289 whp and 277 wtq at AMS (on their dynomite dyno) with my 03 Evo. My mods were xede (with a 91 octane stage 1 basemap), 2.7 inch dp and 3 inch invidia exhaust (including a megan resonated pipe). Boost was at ~22 psi.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:38 PM
  #40  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by riceball777
sounds normal to me
my car has fully 3" tbe with helix high flow cat, hks rs intake, hks 272, hks evc set to 20psi and i made 310whp on tunning technoligies dyno jet.
yes its slow the evo really needs a bigger turbo
The reason your number is low is the low boost. 20 psi is stock boost on an 05 Evo. I do not know what it is on an 03-04, but I guess it is 19 psi. Raise your boost by 2 psi and your numbers should go up to 325-330. That is where your car should be with tbe, cams, intake.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:39 PM
  #41  
Bo'sEvo8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
From: Silver Spring, MD
I had the XEDE on but, it didn't work out with my car..Is your car cammed? If not those are pretty good#s..
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:41 PM
  #42  
Evoryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (55)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 10
From: ☼ Florida ☼
Originally Posted by sho 'um
I had almost the exact mods as you, minus the injectors, and on CFT's Mustang dyno I did 337hp/339tq. And mine was tuned by Jestr .

How much boost are you running?

(And I know of the "issue" with CFT's dyno, but I don't exactly what it is, that it doesn't read like a normal Mustang dyno or something.)

Edit:

And as a reference, I dynoed 246hp/247tq on the same dyno stock w/ k&n drop in.
reads like a dynojet
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #43  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Bo'sEvo8
I had the XEDE on but, it didn't work out with my car..Is your car cammed? If not those are pretty good#s..
No my car is not cammed. The numbers in my sig were on a dynojet on 91 octane gas.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:46 PM
  #44  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by sho 'um
I had almost the exact mods as you, minus the injectors, and on CFT's Mustang dyno I did 337hp/339tq. And mine was tuned by Jestr .

How much boost are you running?

(And I know of the "issue" with CFT's dyno, but I don't exactly what it is, that it doesn't read like a normal Mustang dyno or something.)

Edit:

And as a reference, I dynoed 246hp/247tq on the same dyno stock w/ k&n drop in.
It's not an issue, really. It's just that it reads like a Dynojet as Evoryder mentioned. You can see this in your stock numbers. Most 03s didn't make near that much power in stock form even on a Dynojet, much less a Mustang Dyno. Hell, my 05 made those same numbers on a Dynojet in 50-degree weather, so that gives you a good comparison, and I ran 13.1@104, which is very rare for a stock 03. On regular Mustang dyno's, you would see right around 200-205whp on a stock 03.

Doesn't matter, though, because you got before and after numbers, so you know you had great gains.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2007 | 01:49 PM
  #45  
EVIL_EVO_VIII's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,111
Likes: 1
From: Lake Mary,FL
Originally Posted by Evoryder
reads like a dynojet
Not anymore it doesnt, its been recalibrated.. Procco Evo recently went on that dyno and made 675 and went to Fynetune in miami and make 73x.xx on their dynojet..
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:38 AM.