Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Evolution IX - NA Production Numbers (updated)

Old Feb 3, 2010 | 03:45 PM
  #106  
speedfreak24's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 170
Likes: 2
From: delco PA...philly
Originally Posted by 06RS
Great info, a lot of people including myself have been very curious what the numbers looked like.

On a side note, I'm happy to be one of only 358 with a IX RS.
me too! yay for low numbers, and i wonder how many have been totaled or parted out or stolen and never gotten back so far the #'s have to be less by now.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 02:53 PM
  #107  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
I'm going to play devils advocate for a moment here:

The RS is no more a collector's item than any other evo. Don't get me wrong, I love my car. I feel fortunate to have my SE and I don't blame the guys who are happy to have their far more rare RS. Good on you, it is pretty unique. From an outside perspective though, they're still mitsubishi's, and your guys' don't even have power windows or locks. I passed on purchasing two different RS's out here alone because they had been BEAT_TO_HELL. At least in both cases of the RS's out here, they'd been driven way too hard by some unappreciative younger owners.

With a stat like that, you'll definitely get props from other evo owners for sure, just not sure that even to this crowd it makes them a collectors item. Can anyone think of a baseline entry model for any car that is (moreso than their more feature-rich brothers)? Mitsu did a great job of making just enough to keep the demand up for *ALL* the IX's, which I think is pretty impressive. RS included.

Last edited by boozeup&riot; Feb 4, 2010 at 02:56 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 06:50 PM
  #108  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
IMO....The RS will not be more of a value adder on the streets....But, to those in the know, the RS, for me, is a substantial upgrade (Less is More i.e. 80lbs less).....Aluminum roof / trunk interior delete / crank windows / wing delete / rear wiper delete / ABS delete / Less interior sound deadening......You gotta love it......My buggy moderately modded / 382whp

Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #109  
Evo IX MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 705
Likes: 0
From: California
I really wanted an RS before I got my car. The only reason I wanted the RS was because it had no ABS.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #110  
vetboss's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
From: Shenandoah Valley, VA
^looks good
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #111  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Very nice, man.


Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
IMO....The RS will not be more of a value adder on the streets....But, to those in the know, the RS, for me, is a substantial upgrade (Less is More i.e. 80lbs less).....Aluminum roof / trunk interior delete / crank windows / wing delete / rear wiper delete / ABS delete / Less interior sound deadening......You gotta love it......My buggy moderately modded / 382whp

Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #112  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by MinusPrevious
IMO....The RS will not be more of a value adder on the streets....But, to those in the know, the RS, for me, is a substantial upgrade (Less is More i.e. 80lbs less).....Aluminum roof / trunk interior delete / crank windows / wing delete / rear wiper delete / ABS delete / Less interior sound deadening......You gotta love it......My buggy moderately modded / 382whp

Seems like a shame to saddle the car with so much additional rotational mass. FWIW, the RS trunk isn't aluminum, but is is slightly lighter than the standard lid.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 09:04 AM
  #113  
Blitz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 3
From: Earth
I like the RS a lot, but there are a few things it lacks that add negligible weight that I want in a daily driver, like HIDs and power locks (windows are nice too, but I could live without them). Once you add those, you might as well have just gotten a regular/MR, what with how rare the RS is.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 09:12 AM
  #114  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Originally Posted by FJF
Seems like a shame to saddle the car with so much additional rotational mass. FWIW, the RS trunk isn't aluminum, but is is slightly lighter than the standard lid.
Shame is a pretty relative term here. Stock for stock, the cars all behaved nearly identical, but I see what you're saying. It's still 60-80lbs that have already been saved for you.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 09:31 AM
  #115  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot
Shame is a pretty relative term here. Stock for stock, the cars all behaved nearly identical, but I see what you're saying. It's still 60-80lbs that have already been saved for you.
Rotational mass doesn't behave in the same way as static mass. It noticeably impacts every aspect of performance. Adding to that quotient, while outlining the bounds of a lightweight configuration, doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2010 | 11:31 AM
  #116  
boozeup&riot's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 1
From: you-taw
Originally Posted by FJF
Rotational mass doesn't behave in the same way as static mass. It noticeably impacts every aspect of performance. Adding to that quotient, while outlining the bounds of a lightweight configuration, doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
You'll get no arguments from me about that. I was simply suggesting that the real world benefits of that weight savings, when compared to the other evos in a performance context is marginal. So, thats all I was getting at by saying the term "shame" was kind of relative.

You're spot on about rotational mass behaving differently and I agree.
Reply
Old Feb 6, 2010 | 06:58 PM
  #117  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by boozeup&riot
You'll get no arguments from me about that. I was simply suggesting that the real world benefits of that weight savings, when compared to the other evos in a performance context is marginal. So, thats all I was getting at by saying the term "shame" was kind of relative.

You're spot on about rotational mass behaving differently and I agree.
Thanks Guys........I have certainly looked at wheels (mostly wide 17's).....The thing about the X-Wheels is that they are very strong & they fit (+38)......My suspension tuner (Who is a racer himself "Muellerized") is very much pro X-Wheels & will only suggest wheels w/ the higher off-sets so they can float into to wheel well.....The look I have is "Sleeper" for now........Peace

Edit......Maybe I need the dampening benefits due to E85 effects =)

Last edited by MinusPrevious; Feb 6, 2010 at 07:11 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:08 AM
  #118  
icrnk's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I called Mitsubishi and opened a Service Request asking for total numbers of 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolutions produced for United States consumption. The number I received back was 8,379. I didnt' ask for a break down among the different models (RS, MR, SE, IX).
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 08:41 AM
  #119  
dgoodhue's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Framingham, MA
Originally Posted by icrnk
I called Mitsubishi and opened a Service Request asking for total numbers of 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolutions produced for United States consumption. The number I received back was 8,379. I didnt' ask for a break down among the different models (RS, MR, SE, IX).
Interesting. Looking back at the original post date (October 2007), I wonder if Mitsubishi is only reporting the number of units sold (not imported). I changed job in August of 2007 and looked into buying a IX at that time. Some dealerships still had new SE in stock as of that time period.

Last edited by dgoodhue; Feb 18, 2010 at 10:33 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:31 AM
  #120  
Boostd4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
I would be curious to see how many of the IXs are still on the road (or total CT9As for that matter) due to accidents, theft, etc. Probably no real way to find this out...but would still be interesting to know.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:14 PM.