Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Have you ever been pulled over for OEM equipped parts.
Yes I have.
34.73%
No I have not.
65.27%
Voters: 167. You may not vote on this poll

Post if you've ever been pulled over for OEM parts!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #31  
xISyKIx's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Miramar, FL
Originally Posted by 3K
I got a ticket for the STOCK WING!!!
me too!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 10:58 AM
  #32  
Reth IX MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Lowell, MA
I myself got pulled over for my STOCK EXHAUST back in January and i'm still waiting on the Court Hearing.

So I went to the Mitsubishi Dealership and got it inspected and of course my exhaust system is stock of course. So they told me to bring the signed documents that they have given me and bring it to the hearing. SHould be a quick easy win.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 11:23 AM
  #33  
Toxin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 2
From: Way ahead...
Originally Posted by mmartahus
hahaha, i doubt anyone was pulled over due to a spoiler

Me.

Twice
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 11:27 AM
  #34  
EatSleepBoost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 971
Likes: 0
From: Mass
haha. sick thread. i got pulled over for my stock wing as well. the cop said "well u know you are attracting alot of attention to yourself with all these aftermarket parts like that big wing." at the time my exterior was bone stock other than tint
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #35  
TougeGod7's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 606
Likes: 3
From: California
stock exhaust and stock upper intercooler pipe. CHP FTL
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 11:35 AM
  #36  
Deepseadiver's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,102
Likes: 0
From: GUAM, USA
Never been pulled for stock parts, Once for no front plate.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 12:49 PM
  #37  
RedWing03's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in CT
Originally Posted by 3K
I got a ticket for the STOCK WING!!!
Yeah...
I've been pulled over twice for my stock wing...
Something about it be illegal to have one because is obstructs view, regardless if it's factory or not...
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 01:20 PM
  #38  
90GSX-03EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Virginia
I wonder if the Pontiac Aztec, Toyota Prius, Honda CRX, and Honda Insight are all illegal in these officers eyes because of the obstruction of view claims. They all have hatches in the back that limit the view and the black portion of the rear of those cars is actually tinted lens, but above these tinted portions, there are solid sections of material that clearly obstruct just as much rearward view as the OEM Evo wing.

Read the text to the right of the pic in this link...

http://reviews.cnet.com/2300-10863_7...s=0&o=10000344

"Look out of the Insight's rear-view mirror and you'll see a split-glass view featuring a cross-member that horizontally bisects the field of view."

And now here are some examples:





Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 01:46 PM
  #39  
CoachG's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 524
Likes: 3
From: Central NJ
Pulled over by police to "check seatbelt compliance". Found out later that the "seatbelt check" is actually not allowed in the state when it hapened.

Officer took issue with...wing (stock was too high), exhaust (stock was too loud & simply must have been modified), HIDs (stockers just couldn't be that bright), and tail lights (the factory wouldn't use clear housings as stock tails now would they?).

When push came to shove before a judge, I presented the original Mitsu Evo brochure showing the stock vehicle and listing the stock parts as compared to pictures of my vehicle in the court paring lot earlier that morning. (FYI-I now keep the brochure in the glove box in case of future harassment). The judge was very annoyed with the officer for wasting his (& the courts) time.

All citations dropped. Officer (after being dressed down by the judge in court) ordered to issue official apology.

The police continually display a complete lack of understanding or respect of modern cars and/or the import car hobby. They've seen too many stupid movies about imported Japanese cars where everyone who drives a stylish car simply must be a racer, criminal, or other cliched law breaker.

I hope that these patterns of abuse of power stop. Good luck with your case.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 02:03 PM
  #40  
McLaren F1 2003's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 678
Likes: 1
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by streetracerkam

"Unknown Noises from the Engine - Unsafe"
LMAO!!!

that is just awesome
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 03:45 PM
  #41  
xRoguex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 12
From: Pittsburgh, PA
"your car looks modified"

Yes - mitsu took a plane jane lancer - and soaked it in a steroid bath for 2 weeks. it grew this way.

Yes its modified you ignorate pig. It a s-p-o-r-t-s car. Just like a 911, or a vette, or a anything. Hemi you owned 20 years ago.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 04:06 PM
  #42  
JDL62876's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Originally Posted by 3K
I got a ticket for the STOCK WING!!!
Why do cops pull people over for the stock wing?! What is the beef they have with it..too high? Do they see it was obstructing the rearview?

I'm curious what the rational is on this, or what you've been told my police...
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:32 PM
  #43  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
its because the wing looks aftermarket like the other whale tales you see Nopi and other cheap aftermarket parts company makes. There have been way to many people with cars modified to look like how the EVO comes stock for them to know the difference unless they are into Japanese cars
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 05:57 PM
  #44  
EMonz57's Avatar
Evolving Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 309
Likes: 1
From: Halifax Ma <> Tampa Fl
I got stopped by a MA state trooper one time. My car was far from stock though. He says "I stopped you for no front plate, Dark tint, 11 month old Rejection sticker lmao and he goes to walk back to his car and stops and say OH by the way your car smells pretty bad from behind..... you know why". I thinking great I am getting written up for a big ticket even though nothing was moving violations. He comes back and say hey I wrote you up for no front plate its $20, have a good day...... oh yea one more thing, uhh are these cars really actually that fast? are they as fast as everyone says? I laugh and say "I don't know I never go faster than 65 mph sir" He replied "oh ,ok I had a feeling you would say something to that effect, have a god day"
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #45  
sikrsix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,229
Likes: 2
From: Maine W/NJ Tags! FTP!!!
Originally Posted by 90GSX-03EVO
The "inadequate brakes" part is probably him referring to you leaving it in gear as you decelerate, causing it to engine brake as you also apply the wheel brakes. It causes more noise than an automatic car does since the automatic will basically shift into neutral until the gas is reapplied.

In every state I've lived in, it has been illegal to coast or decelerate in neutral if you are driving a manual transmission car. Basically, the officer was looking to bust you on something. You were either going to take a ticket for inadequate braking system (meaning you had to rely on your engine compression to slow your car) or you were going to take one for coasting in neutral (which you weren't doing).
The part that confuses me, is the ticket doesn't say inadequate brakes, he wrote me down for 2 exhaust violations, that are written the same minus one word. The contested paperwork I received the other day for my court hearing comes back as inadequate brakes. I hope this will be dropped instantly as the cop wrote down something that clearly is false. I would just take my car to mistubishi and have them Inspect it then bring in documents, but I have sold the car since then.. Now how about this --- I was registered in New Jersey!!! How can he even write me a ticket that isnt a traffic violation? I.E. Running a red light, failure to stop at a stop sign, speeding... etc
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:24 PM.