Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Any drawbacks to the older quartermaster twin disk?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 06:55 AM
  #1  
evoforlife's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: FL
Any drawbacks to the older quartermaster twin disk?

Hey guys im looking for a clutch that will hold prob around 600 torque and 800awhp and am just wondering if the older QM twin had any drawbacks because i saw that they switched to a newer version, please reply i need a clutch soon for my build.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 08:31 AM
  #2  
chu's Avatar
chu
Evolved Member
iTrader: (72)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 2
From: Philadelphia
If you daily drive, or even drive on the street soemwhat often, then its not a good idea. Becasue its a twin disk, the friction surface is very thin, and wares out quick. Daily slipping of the clutch makes its ware even quicker...and these things dont like beign slipped.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 10:53 AM
  #3  
evoforlife's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: FL
My car is going to be just a weekend cruiser maybe driven 4 times a month
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 02:17 PM
  #4  
KentStateTsi's Avatar
Evolving Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 111
Likes: 2
From: Ohio
They make alot of noise. I picked up a nice vibration around 2800-4000rpm. Typical of solid hub multi disks. It is a really nice clutch don't get me wrong. Just makes some different noises and rattles.
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 05:43 PM
  #5  
evoforlife's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: FL
Yeah i dont mind rattles, noise, or vibrations just as long as it holds power
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 05:48 PM
  #6  
chaotichoax's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (149)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 6,108
Likes: 18
From: New Jersey
like chu said...if it's not a daily then go for it

they hold gobs of power they just lack life span
Reply
Old Jan 20, 2011 | 06:00 PM
  #7  
BenJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
They are a great clutch, both new and old. They are rated north of 700tq and the shifting is absolutely awesome with them, especially at higher rpm's given the light weight (19lbs).

The downsides, if you can call them that, are a little chatter and a max life of about 10k. There are many people who complain about these aspects of the QM, but when I'm making 1000+hp, I really can't expect things to be either a) quiet or b) last a long time.
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 04:47 AM
  #8  
evoforlife's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: FL
Thanks guys and is the 19lbs the new version ir the old version and whats the difference between the two?
Reply
Old Jan 21, 2011 | 09:53 AM
  #9  
BenJ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,259
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
The old one is 19lbs, the new one is said to be 4lbs heavier so 23lbs. New version is supposed to last a bit longer, have better street manners given its slightly higher weight, has a geared disc setup, and I believe that it is an 8 bolt vs the old that is a 6.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dmx3alo
Evo General
7
Mar 11, 2017 08:18 AM
russ72
09+ Lancer Ralliart General
12
Nov 22, 2014 04:55 AM
icrnk
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Jan 17, 2011 11:31 AM
scheides
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide
13
Dec 20, 2010 07:26 PM
edovio
04-06 Ralliart Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
14
Nov 16, 2007 09:55 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:03 PM.