Back-end Wiggle at High Speed: how can I eliminate?
#62
Originally Posted by TexasRS
Yes, I run 45psi but not on stock tires. Khumo ECSA ASXs. The max psi is 51.
Based on your advice, I decreased the rear pressure to 42psi. Tomorrow I will drive on the highways and see if I notice a decrease in rear twitch.
It seems like there is a lack of consistant support for the effectiveness of the wing, or am I mis-interpreting some of the posts? Any other RS owners who have experienced high-speed twitch, and have advice?
Again, I will try the lower tire pressure and report back....I really like to keep my front tires at 45psi (because of the quicker turn-in handling). Again, I just decreased my rears to 42psi. I had considered decreasing the rear to 40psi (and keeping the front at 45), but I thought that may be too large of a difference b/w front and back.....Is that correct? Would that be unsafe?
Thanks!
Based on your advice, I decreased the rear pressure to 42psi. Tomorrow I will drive on the highways and see if I notice a decrease in rear twitch.
It seems like there is a lack of consistant support for the effectiveness of the wing, or am I mis-interpreting some of the posts? Any other RS owners who have experienced high-speed twitch, and have advice?
Again, I will try the lower tire pressure and report back....I really like to keep my front tires at 45psi (because of the quicker turn-in handling). Again, I just decreased my rears to 42psi. I had considered decreasing the rear to 40psi (and keeping the front at 45), but I thought that may be too large of a difference b/w front and back.....Is that correct? Would that be unsafe?
Thanks!
A real world example of this from my past was that my wife had just gotten new tires for her car and took it out for a weekend trip - about an hour after she left I caght a call from her - she had to do a "panic stop" and the car did a full 360+ and then went backwards into the ditch.
Wen we got the car to a truck stop down the road, I checked her tire presures as part of going over the car - the tires were really over-inflated. What happened was the they were so pumped up that the extra presure has made the contact area of her tires smaller than it shold have been. In addition to that, the extra presure also prevented the tires from using their "natural give" to help keep the tread blocks from slipping when she had to dynomite the brakes. Instead the car essentially acted like it was on ice or wet pavement - once the contact patches had broken free the very high presures let the car just keep sliding along on it's very small and hard contact patches.
While it doesn't sound like your car is anywhere near that bad, you might want talk with somone who knows the Khumo ECSA ASX very well. Even when I run my car at the track, I usually am running lower presures (cold) then you have posted in my R compounds.
#63
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone else with kuhmo ecsa asxs (or similar tire) care to chime in on whether or not 45psi (or even 40psi) will cause instability during breaking and/or driving? Thanks.
#65
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The twitchiness that I was initially referring to was experienced on high speed sweeping turns (130 plus mph) on a road course. There was external wind, but the back-end was definately light and hopping.
I think that this is the reason that Mitsubishi introduced the vortex generator and hope that this adresses the issue. I do not believe that these conditions could be felt in street driving and not in a straight line.
I think that this is the reason that Mitsubishi introduced the vortex generator and hope that this adresses the issue. I do not believe that these conditions could be felt in street driving and not in a straight line.
#66
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by trinydex
HAHHAHA no one else found this hilarious? wow... i would say that thing is borderline rice but i mean... it's all functional right? hahaha that thing is really sitting on the ground.
Emre
#67
Oh, another quick point about tire presures. I wouldn't run quite as much presure for the street or on the road course as I would for an AutoX set-up. On the road or track the car will spend alot more time "at speed" putting heat into the tires and creating a higher "hot" tire presure than you would find after a minute or 2 of dodging cones.
The exact increase will vary based on a variety of factors (including the tire), but it's just something to keep in mind.
The exact increase will vary based on a variety of factors (including the tire), but it's just something to keep in mind.
#68
Originally Posted by Cabo
I vote tire pressures in this case. 45 psi is way to high for everyday driving. The rear tires should be lower if you want stability. I run stock pressures and it takes a lot to get the rear end out. Also, the max pressure on a tire is rarely, if ever, the "recommended" pressure for the tires. The recommended pressure is what the manufacturer puts inside the driver's door (assuming you are running stock sized tires).
Cabo
Cabo
Car manufacturers take a tire, drive it around and figure out what the best setup is for a particular car. 32/29 is what they recommend for the Evo. 45 psi is roughly 40% over that.
#69
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CDO
Car manufacturers take a tire, drive it around and figure out what the best setup is for a particular car. 32/29 is what they recommend for the Evo.
On any particular day, for any particular driver, it is very doubtful that the manufacturer's pressures are in any way optimal. However, it's probably true that they are not awful either.
Running 45psi on a dry day with appropriate tires might be a very good choice. Running 45psi on a very wet day with tires which are almost worn out would be a horrible decision.
And just as a cautionary note about trusting the manufacturer's recommended pressures, there is some evidence that the Ford Explorer/Firestone fiasco of a few years ago (where Firestone tires were shedding their tread and causing wrecks) was partly due to Ford recommending some questionably low tire pressures.
#70
Originally Posted by jbrennen
Running 45psi on a dry day with appropriate tires might be a very good choice. Running 45psi on a very wet day with tires which are almost worn out would be a horrible decision.
And just as a cautionary note about trusting the manufacturer's recommended pressures, there is some evidence that the Ford Explorer/Firestone fiasco of a few years ago (where Firestone tires were shedding their tread and causing wrecks) was partly due to Ford recommending some questionably low tire pressures.
And just as a cautionary note about trusting the manufacturer's recommended pressures, there is some evidence that the Ford Explorer/Firestone fiasco of a few years ago (where Firestone tires were shedding their tread and causing wrecks) was partly due to Ford recommending some questionably low tire pressures.
Ford lowered the tire pressure recommendation to reduce the chance of rollovers. They were going for a lower center of gravity I believe. They ended up trading one risk factor for rollovers for another.
#71
Evolved Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=jbrennen]On any particular day, for any particular driver, it is very doubtful that the manufacturer's pressures are in any way optimal. However, it's probably true that they are not awful either.QUOTE]
Agreed. Recommended is usually a good starting point if you're looking for what would qualify as the best for you...
Cabo
Agreed. Recommended is usually a good starting point if you're looking for what would qualify as the best for you...
Cabo
#72
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=jbrennen]Running 45psi on a dry day with appropriate tires might be a very good choice. Running 45psi on a very wet day with tires which are almost worn out would be a horrible decision.QUOTE]
I don't quite understand how water (on a wet day) is a factor??? Anyone willing to explain? Thanks...
I don't quite understand how water (on a wet day) is a factor??? Anyone willing to explain? Thanks...
#73
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
After decreasing my rear tire pressure to 42 (and keeping my front at 45), I indeed noticed an increase in rear stability on the highway! So, decreasing my rear pressure is good advice!! I'm thinking about trying: 42f 39r.....
By the way, is it safe to have a 5psi difference between front and rear tires? For example: 45f and 40r??
Thanks.
By the way, is it safe to have a 5psi difference between front and rear tires? For example: 45f and 40r??
Thanks.
#74
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TexasRS
I don't quite understand how water (on a wet day) is a factor??? Anyone willing to explain? Thanks...
For instance, if you run lower pressures in the wet, the sidewall (and the tread itself) can flex more to absorb things which might otherwise cause the tire to break loose.
Note that you don't want to go too low on the pressures if there is standing water, because lower tire pressure increases the size of the contact patch. Bigger contact patch means more risk of hydroplaning.
I've run snow tires at 40 psi in extremely wet conditions and actually performed really well (click to read about it) but those were full tread tires with big tread blocks and deep siping, plus a soft tire compound.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarkNight27
Lancer Tires, Wheels, Brakes & Suspension - Sponsored by The Tire Rack
1
Mar 4, 2016 07:31 PM