EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

The 3xMAP/MAF tables

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2012 | 01:33 PM
Share
  #136  
tephra's Avatar
tephra
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Load basically is the volume of air.

the VE is built into the 3xMAP tables...
Reply
0
Old Mar 15, 2012 | 11:18 AM
Share
  #137  
jyamona's Avatar
jyamona
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Northeast PA
does anyone have the logging addresses for MAP Calc and MAF Calc for a 2010 GSR (55570006)
Reply
0
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 12:38 AM
Share
  #138  
RS200Z's Avatar
RS200Z
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
MAPCalcs: 8087CE
MAFCalcs: 808F88
Reply
0
Old Mar 16, 2012 | 07:34 AM
Share
  #139  
jyamona's Avatar
jyamona
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
From: Northeast PA
Originally Posted by RS200Z
MAPCalcs: 8087CE
MAFCalcs: 808F88
thank you!
Reply
0
Old Jun 1, 2012 | 10:25 AM
Share
  #140  
murlo26's Avatar
murlo26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by RS200Z
MAPCalcs: 8087CE
MAFCalcs: 808F88
Are these the same addresses for MAPCalcs and MAFCalcs for the 2008?
Reply
0
Old Jun 1, 2012 | 10:07 PM
Share
  #141  
tephra's Avatar
tephra
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="MAPCalcs" LogReference="MAPCalcs" RequestID="238087b6" Eval="x*100/16384" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="MAFCalcs" LogReference="MAFCalcs" RequestID="23808F60" Eval="x*100/16384" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="4" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
The are for 5269 - but should be the same as 5268 - let me know if you
get odd numbers and ill confirm
Reply
0
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 08:54 PM
Share
  #142  
chetrickerman's Avatar
chetrickerman
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 575
Likes: 1
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by tephra
Code:
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="MAPCalcs" LogReference="MAPCalcs" RequestID="238087b6" Eval="x*100/16384" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="2" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
<DataListItem DataLog="N" Color="" Display="MAFCalcs" LogReference="MAFCalcs" RequestID="23808F60" Eval="x*100/16384" Unit="load" MetricEval="" MetricUnit="" ResponseBytes="4" GaugeMin="0" GaugeMax="255" ChartMin="0" ChartMax="255" ScalingFactor="1" Notes="" Priority="1" Visible="False" />
The are for 5269 - but should be the same as 5268 - let me know if you
get odd numbers and ill confirm
They are good
Reply
0
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 09:18 PM
Share
  #143  
murlo26's Avatar
murlo26
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by chetrickerman
They are good
correct, I used them today for logging. My MAP tables are smoothed out now and raised. They still need to get bumped up more I think, more testing/logging/tuning to occur soon. But the logging addresses work, thanks Tephra
Reply
0
Old Jun 2, 2012 | 09:57 PM
Share
  #144  
BakaUnchi's Avatar
BakaUnchi
Evolving Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: SlowCal
Originally Posted by murlo26
correct, I used them today for logging. My MAP tables are smoothed out now and raised. They still need to get bumped up more I think, more testing/logging/tuning to occur soon. But the logging addresses work, thanks Tephra
Reply
0
Old Jun 3, 2012 | 07:56 PM
Share
  #145  
Golden's Avatar
Golden
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
All the MAFcalcs and MAPcalcs are up on my site.
Reply
0
Old Jun 6, 2012 | 10:08 AM
Share
  #146  
rrkpitt15's Avatar
rrkpitt15
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Golden
All the MAFcalcs and MAPcalcs are up on my site.

Michael, there is something wrong with the definitions for the 2010 GSR USA model. I get an error when loading a ROM and I dont get any maps starting with the MAF scaling. Error states "Parse error at Line 332, Column 87. No Error Occured"
Reply
0
Old Jun 6, 2012 | 02:07 PM
Share
  #147  
Golden's Avatar
Golden
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,456
Likes: 0
From: Omaha, NE
I fixed it.
Reply
0
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 12:05 PM
Share
  #148  
awdgsx91's Avatar
awdgsx91
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Bringing back a really old thread but I flowed a stock EVO X maf so maybe this data will help you figure out some of the maf units etc.

The maf was flowed with a 1K pulldown because it seems as the ECU has this in the maf circuitry.
ignore the calc error column

Code:
                          Precision Flow Labs
                             402 E. Haven st.
                          Eaton Rapids, MI 48827
                         WWW.PRECISIONFLOWLABS.COM
 
           *** 37pt FLOW TEST FOR MASS AIR FLOW METER ***
 
DATE:  1 Feb 2013  TIME: 15:12:27  BARO: 29.386  TEMP:   70.9  HUM: 15%
Air Density: 1.1704 kg/m3
Ser No: 13C00011  Calibration: G35       24

evo 10 stock airbox with 1k pull down resistor
 
ACTUAL     AVG.              PRESSURE 
 FLOW    90 SAMPS.   SIGMA     DROP       Calc       %        %
KG./Hr.    Volts     Volts    In. H2O     KGH      ERROR    NOISE
 
1552.63     4.962     .007    34.468    1335.75   -13.97      .88
1470.42     4.897     .008    31.261    1282.60   -12.77     1.01
1277.27     4.712     .010    23.611    1135.54   -11.10     1.31
1092.41     4.510     .009    17.430     988.50    -9.51     1.31
 932.81     4.304     .009    12.649     852.91    -8.57     1.31
 797.69     4.113     .011     9.435     739.52    -7.29     1.62
 681.87     3.940     .010     7.070     647.17    -5.09     1.54
 584.10     3.770     .008     5.360     564.19    -3.41     1.25
 499.61     3.606     .010     4.054     491.28    -1.67     1.75
 428.97     3.456     .008     3.111     430.66      .39     1.45
 368.13     3.302     .009     2.372     373.70     1.51     1.76
 314.81     3.162     .010     1.813     326.93     3.85     1.96
 270.24     3.030     .010     1.413     286.62     6.06     2.09
 231.28     2.897     .010     1.069     249.82     8.02     2.07
 198.01     2.769     .010      .831     217.75     9.97     2.16
 170.42     2.652     .011      .647     191.06    12.11     2.53
 146.69     2.544     .011      .519     168.69    15.00     2.68
 125.72     2.432     .012      .394     147.63    17.42     2.97
 106.61     2.322     .012      .305     128.87    20.88     3.10
  91.53     2.230     .011      .237     114.47    25.06     2.98
  79.95     2.154     .012      .197     103.54    29.50     3.18
  67.74     2.062     .011      .139      91.30    34.78     3.07
  58.08     1.983     .012      .107      81.63    40.55     3.53
  49.71     1.909     .011      .079      73.18    47.20     3.40
  42.63     1.841     .013      .056      66.01    54.84     3.99
  37.09     1.786     .010      .041      60.48    63.05     3.29
  31.58     1.724     .012      .019      54.74    73.33     3.96
  28.72     1.690     .010      .008      51.70    80.01     3.38
  25.89     1.651     .010     -.007      48.43    87.03     3.53
  22.18     1.601     .009     -.016      44.40   100.14     3.23
  18.32     1.541     .010     -.015      39.81   117.24     3.55
  15.10     1.493     .009     -.040      36.46   141.43     3.32
  12.24     1.443     .006     -.044      33.14   170.80     2.34
   8.38     1.365     .002     -.044      28.38   238.87      .94
   6.73     1.326     .003     -.055      26.19   289.35     1.05
   4.89     1.277     .003     -.051      23.65   383.40     1.29
   0.00     1.157     .001     0.000      18.19     0.00     0.00
 
 
This flow test performed by:_____________________________
 
 
This flow test verified by:_____________________________
 
* This flow Meter test was performed using standards that are Traceable to The National Institute 
   of Standards and Technology
* The uncertainty of the flow rate is 0.19% at a 95% confidence level
  
*
Reply
0
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 12:09 PM
Share
  #149  
awdgsx91's Avatar
awdgsx91
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
I'm trying to come up with a blow-thru maf solution for the evo X. Need someone to do some testing with a maf.. Here is the transfer function for the maf they would be using..

http://www.pmas-maf.com/resources/PFLHPXN2GT4.xls
Reply
0
Old Jan 3, 2014 | 12:53 PM
Share
  #150  
awdgsx91's Avatar
awdgsx91
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tephra
Load basically is the volume of air.

the VE is built into the 3xMAP tables...
From what I've seen in most mass air ecu strategies Ford, GM, Nissan, toyota etc.

Load = actual airflow aka maf reading/ theoretical max engine airflow aka engine displacement * RPM * VE
Reply
0



Advanced Search

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:32 PM.