Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Evo X vs STi on next week's Top Gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:03 PM
  #106  
jimm's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: NashVagas
Originally Posted by DrPhyzx
Since when? You guys are funny.

Ever thought about looking up things for yourself? (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...6/pageNumber=4)
0-60 mph acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 4.9
EVO X MR 5.2
08 STI 4.5
Diff=0.7 Sec to 60

Quarter-mile acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 13.6
EVO X MR 13.9
08 STI 13.3
Diff=0.6 sec to 1/4

Quarter-mile speed, mph
EVO X GSR 101.3
EVO X MR 98.8
08 STI 100.3

GSR version faster and catching up, the MR is still behind at a 1/4. Shows how much the SST is slowing down the launch.

All and all this supports my post...the EVO MR does not launch as hard so gives up 0.6 to 0.7 sec just at the take off that it almost claws all back by the end of the 1st lap. If given a couple of more laps the STI is toast....I bet the GSR catches it before the end of the first lap.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:21 PM
  #107  
dcasandman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma City
Car and Driver have the MR even slower than those numbers. 5.4 for car and driver and I think Road & Track Even have it at 5.6.

Car Driver also has the GSR in one test doing it at 4.6 and in another 4.9 though.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #108  
Joe's Evo X's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 702
Likes: 3
From: Alamogordo, NM
Originally Posted by jimm
Ever thought about looking up things for yourself? (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...6/pageNumber=4)
0-60 mph acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 4.9
EVO X MR 5.2
08 STI 4.5
Diff=0.7 Sec to 60

Quarter-mile acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 13.6
EVO X MR 13.9
08 STI 13.3
Diff=0.6 sec to 1/4

Quarter-mile speed, mph
EVO X GSR 101.3
EVO X MR 98.8
08 STI 100.3

GSR version faster and catching up, the MR is still behind at a 1/4. Shows how much the SST is slowing down the launch.

All and all this supports my post...the EVO MR does not launch as hard so gives up 0.6 to 0.7 sec just at the take off that it almost claws all back by the end of the 1st lap. If given a couple of more laps the STI is toast....I bet the GSR catches it before the end of the first lap.
This is such BS the GSR is so much quicker. They need better drivers out there. I ran a 13.50 first time at the track at 103mph stock with no reflashes. O ya that was at 3800ft above sea level. People need to learn how to launch these things man.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #109  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
So why don't we just say on a test that includes a standing start, the evo x gsr ss-t and the sti are about even, and the evo x will be faster on anything else... period.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 09:24 PM
  #110  
AkumaMax's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Forest Park,IL
Look at it this way. Even though the Top gear review wasn't as stunning as everyone expected it to be both the EVO's and STI are a major improvement in one way or another. These are both great cars. My buddy Love9sick got an EVO X and yes it is amazing. The STI I'm sure is no slouch either. We just have to look at it as the EVO has always been ahead since the begging and the STI is not that far behind. This year they have improved both models with new better, and might I add stunning Super-Handling. Sure looks are good/bad for some people but really these cars outweigh the previous models in nearly every way. A change has been made and it is better, some might not see, it others don't want to believe it, but sooner or later they will find them selfs appreciating the new models.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2008 | 09:29 PM
  #111  
AkumaMax's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Forest Park,IL
Originally Posted by jimm
Ever thought about looking up things for yourself? (http://www.edmunds.com/apps/vdpconta...6/pageNumber=4)
0-60 mph acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 4.9
EVO X MR 5.2
08 STI 4.5
Diff=0.7 Sec to 60

Quarter-mile acceleration, sec.
EVO X GSR 13.6
EVO X MR 13.9
08 STI 13.3
Diff=0.6 sec to 1/4

Quarter-mile speed, mph
EVO X GSR 101.3
EVO X MR 98.8
08 STI 100.3

GSR version faster and catching up, the MR is still behind at a 1/4. Shows how much the SST is slowing down the launch.

All and all this supports my post...the EVO MR does not launch as hard so gives up 0.6 to 0.7 sec just at the take off that it almost claws all back by the end of the 1st lap. If given a couple of more laps the STI is toast....I bet the GSR catches it before the end of the first lap.

I would like to see the number for the MR after about 40-50k miles on the car. Most of the people I know that have Sport shift trannys complain about the slow switching from gear to gear after all the mileage they put on. The reason I say most is because the other had the tranny rebuilt or just went to a stick.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:10 AM
  #112  
Tunerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 822
Likes: 0
From: vEgAs
Originally Posted by Alexander
here's a little sneak peak

That's Hawt!
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:29 AM
  #113  
love9sick's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West IL
That shot above is hot.

Last edited by love9sick; Jul 1, 2008 at 12:37 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 12:36 AM
  #114  
love9sick's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 972
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West IL
Originally Posted by AkumaMax
Look at it this way. Even though the Top gear review wasn't as stunning as everyone expected it to be both the EVO's and STI are a major improvement in one way or another. These are both great cars. My buddy Love9sick got an EVO X and yes it is amazing. The STI I'm sure is no slouch either. We just have to look at it as the EVO has always been ahead since the begging and the STI is not that far behind. This year they have improved both models with new better, and might I add stunning Super-Handling. Sure looks are good/bad for some people but really these cars outweigh the previous models in nearly every way. A change has been made and it is better, some might not see, it others don't want to believe it, but sooner or later they will find them selfs appreciating the new models.
What the hell are you talking about Matt? The review of the the X in top gear is stunning as hell. The STI is no improvement over the old ones on the contrary in-fact. LoL, damn did you watch the same video as me? haha

Last edited by love9sick; Jul 1, 2008 at 12:46 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #115  
dsrttigr's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
From: usa
i think jc is being sarcastic and acting like a evo fanboy, im suprised the sti was almost dead even with those bad dunlop 17/235 tires and 12k cheaper. seems the europe and japan model sti is faster but the usa version isnt.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #116  
skyblas's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: MS/SG...now in perth
but
remember this
the subaru is 2.5l
while the evo is 2.0l
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 09:06 AM
  #117  
mezzedupdream's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Downey, Ca
Originally Posted by Joe's Evo X
This is such BS the GSR is so much quicker. They need better drivers out there. I ran a 13.50 first time at the track at 103mph stock with no reflashes. O ya that was at 3800ft above sea level. People need to learn how to launch these things man.
better than the stig?? haha
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:11 AM
  #118  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by Uhprentis
Sigh, such thoughts like one cannot be better that 'the stig' are just (IMO) mindless, fanboy thoughts.

NO ONE knows who 'the stig' (the current 'white one') is. So how can you can anyone really say. Sure, he's certainly a great driver, there are lots of great drivers.

Also, let's be realistic here. The stig is not one person, and I don't mean from white to black either. The 'white' one is not always the same person. That's why he can't talk or be seen. Sure, they'll tell you he can't talk because his opinions on cars 'would be rubbish', but lets be realistic they are protecting the character while maintaining the possibility of hiring any driver, anytime. I'm sure each and every 'different' dirver that has played the stig is under contractual obligation not to reveal it thusly.

Just keep this in mind when bowing down to 'the stig'. I can near guarantee the fact is that the stig is NOT a single individual at all. All indicators point to that, and barring facts to the contrary, I'm sticking with that as how I see his character. Just a very good racecar driver....on an entertaining TV show.
I think his point was not necessarily that, but that the stig is a professional race car driver. whoever else made that comment is not. And also, it's not just about drag racing. No one is saying he's the greatest, we're not idiots. It's just a joke, but the fact is he is still an excellent driver and I'll take my money over whoever is in the stig suit over anyone here.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:22 AM
  #119  
Jblade's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
From: ILL
Originally Posted by ZK
Just because you can enter at 110 doesn't mean it is any faster than the other cars. He's power sliding and losing speed while cornering. If he was really going for a fast lap, he wouldn't be entering at 110.
Agreed, but I think the point was to show you the handling and control at 110 in that particular corner that would result in a spin out in most of the "supercars". Similiar to him showing of the "one finger drift" from the FQ vs lambo vid
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #120  
EvoBroMA's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,345
Likes: 1
From: MA
Originally Posted by Jblade
Agreed, but I think the point was to show you the handling and control at 110 in that particular corner that would result in a spin out in most of the "supercars". Similiar to him showing of the "one finger drift" from the FQ vs lambo vid
that's exactly it. the point is that the car inspires so much confidence because it lets you take corners faster than you should, without penalizing you by spinning out.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:50 AM.