Choosing between SRT-4 and EVO

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Mar 6, 2007 | 09:06 AM

#166

j14mp

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Nov 2006

Posts: 710

Likes: 0

From: ayer mass

i wonder what this person got considering it was posted back in 2005... hmmm

i think if i had the money when i got my srt i would easily gotten the evo cause its instant sex compared to the srt lol but that was back when looks phased me haha

Mar 6, 2007 | 09:58 AM

#167

Clutchdc5

Evolved Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 1,623

Likes: 1

From: at the 5-10 no limit tables

omgg

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hypnoz

See the sad thing is the SRT's 20k interior is as good as your EVO's 30k interior. That comment is completely outrageous.

Especially when you compare straight line acceleration.

The EVO only has a few advantages to the SRT-4. A SLIGHT braking advantage, and obviously a massive handling advantage, and a small acceration advantage.

Looks are completely subjective.

Omg you can't be serious. Please don't compare your non performance brakes to our high performance brembos..

Srt4 breaks down as much as mustangs

Mar 6, 2007 | 10:25 AM

#168

mtwnind.

Evolving Member

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 157

Likes: 0

From: jersey

just buy a saturn and call it a day

Mar 6, 2007 | 10:27 AM

#169

donmeca2020

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 4,514

Likes: 0

From: Hollywood,florida

dude im not ragging on dodge, but i just went on a weekend trip to orlando, and one of the guys owns a 03 srt4. for some reason when we came back he got home and went to start the car and it was dead for no apparent reason. i mean you all might say oh he had a **** battery. but hey thats another thing that proves my point. didnt happen to my evo i know that. also probably as other already mention what the **** is the deal with the front power windows and non power in the rear?>

Mar 6, 2007 | 02:12 PM

#170

IXToes

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 333

Likes: 0

From: San Diego

Quote:

Originally Posted by Warrtalon

Regardless, the srt-4 is a cool car and is good for little ricers that want to go fast without any real handling or traction and without any real racing ability.

Sorry I had to quote this

Mar 6, 2007 | 02:30 PM

#171

grubiaco

Evolved Member

iTrader: (23)

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 945

Likes: 0

From: central cali

If money wasn't an issue go with the evo because you will have the power, handling, and traction. The srt-4 has the power.

Mar 6, 2007 | 02:34 PM

#172

RnRjames

Evolving Member

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 125

Likes: 0

From: SAN DIEGO

yup

keep urself on the road with all wheel drive. neons are horrible handlers.

Mar 6, 2007 | 02:42 PM

#173

krafty

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 608

Likes: 0

From: Deltona, FL

I have both. Evo is better!

Mar 6, 2007 | 06:45 PM

#174

Evo_Jay

Evolved Member

iTrader: (17)

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts: 3,419

Likes: 14

From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)

Quote:

Originally Posted by krafty

I have both. Evo is better!

This statement FTMFW.

Mar 6, 2007 | 07:53 PM

#175

EVO8904

Evolving Member

iTrader: (30)

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 498

Likes: 2

From: Wesley Chapel, FL

srt4's HAHAHA that is a f*cking JOKE....

Mar 6, 2007 | 08:02 PM

#176

jab_phoenix

Newbie

Joined: Sep 2006

Posts: 65

Likes: 0

From: Anchorage

you do realize that we pick on mustangs calling them "ford neons" shouldnt that tell you something? neons are a joke... mustangs are a joke as well... the 03 cobra isnt a complete joke. but other than that. get lost kid if your ricer enough to even compare the srt4 to an evo then your a twit and would most likely put light bars, aluminum wings, fake plastic bodykits, cheap crap exhaust and a retarded bov. so yeah. please buy the neon i dont want to see another riced out evo kthnxbye