Notices
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules New member? Come on in, introduce yourself, and get acquainted with the evolutionm.net posse :) FAQs will also be answered in here.

Choosing between SRT-4 and EVO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 03:06 AM
  #106  
Hypnoz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
why is there seven page of this ****. i cant believe this. if anyone says something about the SRT-4 being better, faster, looking better or anything, then they are the most stupid ****ing person i have meet. the SRT-4 is only better if your poor and can't afford an EVO, (and even then i would get a WRX, **** American Cars, they suck)

There are seven pages because of people like you. Obviously you don't understand the concept of opinions. There are plenty of people that prefer the look of the SRT-4 to the EVO. Most prefer the EVO to the SRT though. From a roll it is not hard to figure out that the SRT is just as fast.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 03:16 AM
  #107  
machron1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 1
From: Portland, Oregon
Originally Posted by dizzigital
Let's compare a Mercedes to a Kia.

More like comparing a Ferrari 360 Modena to a Corvette C5 Z06. The Ferrari, like the Evo, is refined and a complete package. The Vette can put up nearly the same numbers but it's not going to feel as good doing it. The numbers don't give a complete picture. Most people aren't good enough drivers to know the difference or actually have a need for the refinement though.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 03:17 AM
  #108  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Hypnoz - your stupid
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #109  
Hypnoz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
Hypnoz - your stupid

I know, everyone who has a stronger arguement compared to yours is stupid. Good luck in life.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 10:52 AM
  #110  
Nelson L.'s Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: NYC
SRT = Poor man's Evo. Enough said. Not knocking on the Neon.

Powerwise, it's up there. In terms of quality, I would like to believe Mitsubishi has a major advantage on that.

If you want to go fast without spending the $$, SRT is your best bet.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #111  
Hypnoz's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
I wouldn't say the EVO's "quality" (in terms of interior) is much greater than the SRT-4's. As far as plastics, and seats go. The EVO's interior design is better IMO. Also i'd say the SRT is more reliable though.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 11:30 AM
  #112  
lookEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
From: Denver, Colorado
+1 hypnoz
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 01:39 PM
  #113  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
american cars ****ing suck
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 01:41 PM
  #114  
Kordwood's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Vestal, NY
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
american cars ****ing suck


Yeah, and Mitsubishi has such an outstanding reputation for quality!! LOL.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #115  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
ive never seen an american car with more then 200,000 miles and i have seen many honda's,nissian's, subaru's, and mitsubishi's (and many other Asian & European Cars). Also if anyone here doesn't like their Evo and likes the SRT-4, you can send your Evo to me, i wouldn't mind another. (ill even pay shipping)
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:26 PM
  #116  
Thegame's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
To be honest, if someone could afford an evo, why on earth would they consider the SRT-4? the SRT-4 was my back up plan if something went seriously wrong with my EVO/STI plan. Like the guy above said, american cars just aren't made as good as Japanese.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:30 PM
  #117  
meisnerboy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
yeah but is Mits quality much better (or Subaru)?

They aint Hondas folks
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #118  
Thegame's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,426
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
actually subaru was voted as the most reliable car according to consumer reports. oh and by the way my friend just had to get rid of his neon because it broke about once a week after 50,000 miles.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #119  
turtlelancer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Seriously Just get the fing srt4 and drop this thread. If you even consider getting an srt4 while you have money for the evo, you deserve the srt4 and not the evo. Plz everyone just stop posting in this thread.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #120  
evo loco's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati,Oh
i test drove both the same day and went home with the evo .it all depends on what you want to spend.good luck.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM.