Notices
Future Lancer / Evo Models Discuss any rumors and/or news concerning future Lancer and Evolution models in here.

Dodge and Mitsubishi to Share Neon Platform | [MERGED]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 12:58 PM
  #121  
werra's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
they are going for a chrysler 300c look.... those are real hot right now. lol
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 12:59 PM
  #122  
evo_il8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
it wont happen
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #123  
Eckstant's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Originally Posted by themann42
good to see someone step up and acknowlege dodge for what they are. the one thing i hate about these forums is how everyone bashed everything that's not a mitsu. but the only thing excellent or above par about mitsu is the evo.
Dodge does have their **** together when it comes to performance. But you're on a MITSUBISHI site. Of course there's going to be biased opinions.

much of this is just opinion and doesn't count for anything. 'fwd is lame' 'the cars ugly'. for 20k it's not lame, if they had awd they're have to increase the price. besides, the car has been praised by magazines and anybody that looks at the car for what it is, and not just 'oh it's just a neon'.
Hence being in a forum and talking about cars. Everyone says opinions. Especially on a topic like this. Yes, my OPINION is biased once again because of my location. FWD IS LAME in Rain and in Snow. ****, it's lame in dry conditions because of wheel hop. And as for the end quote...Yes. It is still a neon. They're quick for the price, but they're not worth it.


the new hemi's still have a hemispherical combustion chamber, how is it not a hemi?
Because of the advertising that they've done. It's been made to sound like it's the old Hemi that was in the muscle cars. But since they don't have much in common aside from the head. They're nothing like they used to be.

the cobalt ss isn't too shabby. i think 22k is a little high though.
The cobalt is the new Cavalier. And I don't know anyone that would pay 22k for a cav.




srt-4, srt-6, srt-8 300, srt-8 magnum, srt-8 charger, srt-10 viper, srt-10 ram...
Yes, I knoooow, hence me naming the **** off. The SRT-4 is weaksauce. The 6 is...well, underpowered. SRT-8 300/magnum is nice, but silly in the same sense. and the 10's...like I said are a little out of reach for the everyday'r. I'm also even more biased against a company that takes the wagon off the magnum and calls it a "Charger".

Ugh....
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #124  
Nathan's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
my god, that orange thing has got to be the ugliest car I have ever seen. did chrysler steal all of GM's designers recently or something?
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #125  
MR. SNOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Next 2 NYC
As long as the EVO is kept as a true high performance car I would buy it. Let Mitsu get her money from whoever she can as long as she keeps her integrity in the EVO and the eclipse gets a 4 cylinder AWD T. Who cares if dodge wants to copy the EVO. Their SRT Neon sucks a fatty

I luv the EVO
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #126  
Nextcar's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
If you want a LEGEND EVO buy one now. This future DCX creation will be a good car in 3 years but will be loaded with severe engineering flaws from get go.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2005 | 08:00 AM
  #127  
Illinest's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: harrisburg, PA
Originally Posted by FaLeX
New four-cylinders to power Caliber, other models





http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102902

ugly, but better than the neon.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 09:31 AM
  #128  
bounce's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
The title of this thread is incorrect. The Neon is being dropped. The Caliber is a totally new platform. The Caliber won't be a next gen Neon and since it's a totally different layout and will not be an entry level/first time buyer car, I wouldn't expect a potential Neon customer to have any interest in the Caliber.
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #129  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Very true. And hopefully the Caliber will be respected as a more upmarket car. I saw where they were supposedly testing an SRT-4 version of it, maybe it will have AWD. The thing is, will the press respect it as an upmarket car, or will they always refer to it as a tarted up Neon SUV? Just like when GM came out with the Cobalt, they wanted people to forget the Cavalier and think of it as a much better car, but people still think of it as GM's cheapo car. If they ***** them out with rebates and sell thousands of them to rental fleets, then it won't make any difference. It'll just be the next Neon. But I totally agree with the you.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 10:57 AM
  #130  
psycho 4 life's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: orlando
for those of you that think they are going to share same platform this was in the newspaper today and on the news yesterday



FRANKFURT, Germany - The automaker DaimlerChrysler AG said Friday it has sold its remaining 12.4 percent stake in Japan's Mitsubishi Motors Corp. to the U.S. investment firm Goldman Sachs Group Inc. The purchase price wasn't disclosed.
ADVERTISEMENT

But DaimlerChrysler said the sale would boost its revenue for 2005 by some 500 million euros ($588 million).

The German-American car maker once held 37 percent of Mitsubishi Motors as part of its goal to become a global auto powerhouse, but in 2004 the company decided against pumping more money into the troubled Japanese automaker.

As a result of the deal, Goldman Sachs now becomes Mitsubishi Motors' largest shareholder with a 13.4 percent stake. Before the latest share transaction, DaimlerChrysler was Mitsubishi Motors' fourth-largest shareholder.

Mitsubishi Motors, Japan's fourth-biggest carmaker, has seen its sales in Japan plunge after acknowledging five years ago that it had systematically hidden auto defects for more than two decades to avoid recalls.

Mitsubishi Motors, also known as MMC, said current cooperation projects with DaimlerChrysler would not be affected by the share sale.

The two carmakers jointly develop and produce engines and share use of vehicle architecture. They also jointly produce passenger cars, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks in Europe, North America, China and South Africa.

"MMC will maintain the relationship with DaimlerChrysler as business partners where both parties continue working on individual alliance projects that are mutually beneficial," the company said.

On Friday, Rudiger Grube resigned from his position on the board of directors of Mitsubishi Motors. The company gave no immediate reason.

Shares of DaimlerChrysler gained 1.8 percent to 42.72 euros ($50.25) in Frankfurt trading.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2005 | 11:37 AM
  #131  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
So what? That doesn't change the fact that they will still share a platform, and the World Engine. They sold their shares Hyundai last year too. It says it right in the middle of your quote:

Originally Posted by psycho 4 life
Mitsubishi Motors, also known as MMC, said current cooperation projects with DaimlerChrysler would not be affected by the share sale.

The two carmakers jointly develop and produce engines and share use of vehicle architecture.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #132  
EVOlution561's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 853
Likes: 3
From: South Florida
i wouldnt buy a dodge
Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 06:42 AM
  #133  
bounce's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by EVOlution561
i wouldnt buy a dodge
Really? I would if it was done right.

Reply
Old Dec 28, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #134  
EquinsuOcha's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: St. Petersburg, FL
I happen to like the Charger, but that's only because I need 4 doors.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 05:01 AM
  #135  
JigGaxBAM's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Fremont
Originally Posted by EVOlution561
i wouldnt buy a dodge

+1, heard there was nasty stuff about the viper srt10 engine...can anyone clarify?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:02 AM.