Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.
View Poll Results: Problems with ECU flash and UTEC?
Have issues with flash and UTEC
5
29.41%
No problems with flash and UTEC
5
29.41%
No flash but problems with UTEC
0
0%
No Flash, No Problems
7
41.18%
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll

Problems w/ UTEC and *flash?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 04:21 PM
  #31  
tlcoll1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Odenton, MD
Originally Posted by MalibuJack
We'll have to wait for someone from TurboXS to chime in to clarify this.. I'm not certain if you've mentioned if you had a UTEC or not, but when you run the dashboard, it very clearly indicates whether its running in open or closed loop, there is a log level that does record some alternate digital signals and some bit signals (on or off) I honestly can't tell you if they indicate open/closed loop in that log simply because I don't recall. There's definitely an indicator of whether or not its running open loop or closed, how it determines that is irrelevant, but how the UTEC acts when its aware of each state is what we're trying to figure out right? (Regardless of whether there's a real signal or not we do know its something calculated or indicated by the ECU since a scan tool does indicate it, and the UTEC is certainly aware of its state)

I do agree with most of what you said about how the closed loop fuel operates, and when your dealing with very large injectors, it makes perfect sense since you run out of adjustment in the trims.. Thats not really the debate here.

However what I am trying to establish (and figure out to some extent) is if the open loop functionality (the UTEC OLF feature) ceases to function below the crossover point, and if below that it alters MAF value only, or if it intercepts the signal from the ECU and scales the injector signal accordingly regardless, or it only acts when in open loop and directly controls the injectors from a background map.. (I tend to think that its operating on MAF frequency below the crossover threshold)

This is obviously a technical detail that none of us has any real info on so we'll have to wait and see.

With all of that said, I have to agree that it really seems to be mostly a "Tweaking" issue and for the most part, is just a learning curve since the background "Map" in the OLF feature is designed around a stock ECU, therefore if a reflash makes alterations that alter the duty cycles, then the background map would be out of sync and cause a jump on transition (Therefore a hiccup) At that point its really just a bit of tweaking.
My impression of the UTEC was that it always drives the injectors itself. If this is true, then it has the option of reading the stock ECU's injector drive signal and offsetting from that amount, or to drive it completely independently. So, if the stock ECU was using a 2 ms injector pulse width at idle, the UTEC could let the user subtract 5% from it, or allow the user to specify "always use 1.5 ms at idle." If this is the difference between "open loop fueling" and whatever "non open loop" is called, then I can see how it'd be really tricky to get this switchover point correct. Additionally, it seems like the switchover would vary with temperature, octane, etc, and be all put impossible to get right. This is only conjecture, though - as you said, it'd be nice if someone from TurboXS would explain how it all works.

And no, I don't own a UTEC. See my home page for why.

Tom
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2004 | 08:21 PM
  #32  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by tlcoll1
My impression of the UTEC was that it always drives the injectors itself. If this is true, then it has the option of reading the stock ECU's injector drive signal and offsetting from that amount, or to drive it completely independently. So, if the stock ECU was using a 2 ms injector pulse width at idle, the UTEC could let the user subtract 5% from it, or allow the user to specify "always use 1.5 ms at idle." If this is the difference between "open loop fueling" and whatever "non open loop" is called, then I can see how it'd be really tricky to get this switchover point correct. Additionally, it seems like the switchover would vary with temperature, octane, etc, and be all put impossible to get right. This is only conjecture, though - as you said, it'd be nice if someone from TurboXS would explain how it all works.

And no, I don't own a UTEC. See my home page for why.

Tom
LOL ok, I understand why you don't run a UTEC..

As far as I can tell from all the time I've spent with the stock ECU, the actual ECU's transition point is around 30% and as far as I can tell, it doesn't appear to vary.

Your conjecture is similar to mine about how it would offset the values.. Closed loop fueling probably uses the signal intercept, but like we've said, only the gods can answer it.. LOL

Open loop fueling features kinda changed the game a little.. Originally it functioned very similarly to all the other piggyback devices and altered the MAF signal +/- a set value, the difference being it always controlled timing directly. Where most piggybacks would alter timing by offsetting the timing (Cam angle sensor??)

I'm always testing different devices, and frequently get evaluation units to do comparisons with.. The one unit I keep coming back to has been the UTEC because of its quasi-standalone control of the boost/ignition/fuel

I do admittedly have a slight advantage when making adjustments, I use an aftermarket blowthrough meter with a Karmann converter and I can adjust the curve, the low point, and the high point.. So if I find my idle is too rich, or too lean, or unstable, or need to raise idle a little, I can adjust that with the trim pots on my converter and optimizer.. (I only wish this functionality was built into the UTEC)
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 12:43 PM
  #33  
Imprezd's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
The answer is relatively simple. When you are using version 1.7+ software with the Open Loop Fuelling option enabled, you have two setting Stock Injector Size and Modified Injector Size.

The Stock Injector Size really is used to calculate the fuel control for the zero percent column. This is most of your driveabability and fuel economy. Nothing does driveability and gas mileage better than the stock ecu, they spent millions of man hours developing just that. So in the zero percent column which is less than 35% TPS in the Default parameters, which is where the UTEC is in control but we are relaying the stock ecu's commands and just offsetting the Maf frequency. If you have modified injectors the utec will calculate the size difference (stock to modified) and apply that to your maf frequency.

The Modified Injector Size applies to the 10%-100% percent load sites. It’s based on pure size value not the difference like the zero column.

If you use a reflashed ecu for larger injectors, you would effectively be scaling the injectors twice, once in the utec and once in the stock ecu with a reflash. Remember that the zero percent column is being scaled based upon the difference in injector size, stock injector size to modified injector size.

After the 35% TPS the stock ecu has no bearing upon Timing or Fuelling reflashed or not.

Jermaine~
www.turboxs.com
301-977-4727
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 05:23 PM
  #34  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
There ya go.. Definitive answer.. I suppose my guess was pretty close.. I guess the designation for those parameters is a bit deceptive and needs to be documented better..

If I had 660 (or 680) CC Injectors, with no reflash, would I enter 660/660 or 550/660??

I understand the rescale of MAF requency, I guess what isn't clear is how you enter the values and their relationship to eachother..
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #35  
Imprezd's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
660/660
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 08:06 PM
  #36  
BlackEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Thanks for asking that question MJ. I don't get how it is supposed to rely on stock/mod injector sizes for scaling < OLF threshold/0%, but then you say to make stock/mod both the same size for larger injectors? How does is then know what stock size is supposed to be for 0% scaling if that's the only place it's used? Conversely, how does 10-100% know what to scale if it doesn't look at the stock size....what's a "size value"?

Thanks for any clarification...
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2004 | 04:15 AM
  #37  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
It appears that the baseline maps are already baselined for stock injectors, therefore all calculations are based off that "Internal" value.. so the "Stock Injector" value would be used to help your Idle (0% column) and generally closed loop operation.. Mod Injector is used for the OLF portions of the maps 10%-100%

This makes perfect sense, however the labels assume you are using those values for the calculation when they arent.. This definitely needs to be documented better. There's no question that if you tuned with 550/550 and changed it to 660/660 that you would alter the entire tune...
Reply
Old Dec 1, 2004 | 09:00 AM
  #38  
TampaTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: Tampa area
Not to open up a dead horse, but I had my car reflashed for the p0300 misfire and now my EGTs are down from 800 degrees to 700-750 degrees depending on boost spike. I hvae to take it easy until I get retuned.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KillaItalian904
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
21
Jan 28, 2007 07:23 PM
evoeightguy
Northwest Region
9
Jan 1, 2006 06:40 PM
tevol1
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
9
Oct 10, 2005 09:24 AM
Dave2
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
6
Nov 15, 2004 09:18 PM
Rollaway
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
9
Apr 19, 2004 07:21 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:07 AM.