Shoudlve used evolution x set up more opportunity for upgrade

 

^ What you talking about willis ? lol. Like peter from family guy, Go on.........

 

running low psi on a cvt like for example 5 psi will give you a maximum of 50 hp to the flywheel, which is crap considering the fact that the only turbo option for 5 psi right now is rrm. its way cheaper to get an RA turbo, im talking like 5 times cheaper lol. no disrespect to cvt owner but i think imo that u guys should stick to Na , u can get a almoust 200 whp NA with a 4b11 , a lil more with 4b12. the problem with the trany is because of the sudden stress on that belt , NA power will not give u that sudden stress . also lets not forget this:
-SO FAR THE FIRST THING TO BRAKE ON CVTS ARE THE BELTS, how do you know its not the weakest part, i mean u dont want to trow $1000 on a missil proff belt just to find out that now u need top reinforce other parts

 

I'm pretty sure the motor is strong enough to handle that power.
I did the math, buying a RA isn't cheaper than adding turbo to GTS, either short term or long term financially.
I trust the R/D RRM has put in confirms it's the belt.

 

I would love to get 200 on an na setup, but belgaram did a full na build for his 2.4 cvt and was able to get in the range of 190 (without evo cams, cam sensor kept breaking). realistically i can see the 2.0 cvt in the 170 180 range. if the cam problem can be fixed then the cvt may be able to reach the 190 200ish range for the 2.0 and over 200 for the 2.4

 

so your saying theres a chanceeee hah

 

yeah pure speculation. there are guys in pr that were able to get the evo x cams to work. they say it just needs a tune, but it does seem to work as such state side.

 

We are getting 200ish+ out of our N/A stuff with CVT so it is a better gamble to do that. Forgot, I am referring to the 2.4 liter also.

ROAD/RACE

 

Yes the fact that belgaram couldnt do it it doesnt mean thats its not doable, and really theres nobody else trying. Im deff getting my 272 on my 4b12 on winter so ill let u know how it works out. No disrespecr to belgaram, actually thumbs up for trying

 

Honestly if our setup in our base lancer wont ever be able to achieve atleast 280 whp and more torque. I am just going to save my money and drop an ls1 small block v8 in it, or an RB26 engine. Alot of people wouldn't do that, I would because I got this car for 8,000 thousand dollars which was a steal. But im going to give it time to see if something comes out for our solution to making our car faster.

 

better start picking a color for that piggy bank

 

here we go again....

 

I'm sure they'll post dynos to prove it... just like they always do... lol.

 

lol 200 hp out of a 178 hp stock super restrictive car thats a huge achievement lmao

 

I don't think they make 178hp to the wheels stock? 200hp is low anyways xD. I was never satisfied with my GTS's speed. Thats why I went 300zx lol.