Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

compression bent piping

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 09:31 PM
  #1  
OzLancerRally's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
compression bent piping

any thoughts or opinions? i live in vegas and all the muffler shops say they do compression bent and said mandrel bent is way more expensive. what you guys think?
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #2  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
For an NA engine, its not a big deal and probably a more cost worthy buy.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #3  
twisty1251's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: lake forest, CA
mandrel bent is more expensive, and its harder to find shops that do it. as long as your doing something that doesn't have a lot of bends it shouldn't be too bad
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #4  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Mandrel is always preferable because it maintains internal diameter, but press bending is fast and cheap. Personally I'd always go for mandrel bends, but I'm picky like that.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 09:02 PM
  #5  
OzLancerRally's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
some1 suggested that if i was going 2.25 compression bent t
at i should go 2.5 to offset and crimps in the bends. any opinions?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 09:28 PM
  #6  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Sounds about right.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2005 | 10:24 PM
  #7  
akasirlancerlot's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,491
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles California
Originally Posted by OzLancerRally
some1 suggested that if i was going 2.25 compression bent t
at i should go 2.5 to offset and crimps in the bends. any opinions?

what i did and i noticed a certain gain.. so i cant complain.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2005 | 06:04 AM
  #8  
OzLancerRally's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
i was thinkin goin 2.5 to offset any crimps. wat muffler should i get w/2.5 inlet?
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2005 | 06:48 PM
  #9  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
I read a paper that did the math on the flow characterisitics of mandrel and crimp bends, a while back. there was almost no difference between crimping and mandrel at angles of 45 deg or less. Greater than 45 starts to collapse the pipe.

For 90deg bends, crimping pretty much squeezes the pipe closed. If you take the heat shield off of your stock exhaust, you'll see what I'm talking about. The shop I buy my stuff from sells "U" mandrel bends and I cut the "U" in half to get my 90deg bend.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 03:15 AM
  #10  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by Alchemist
I read a paper that did the math on the flow characterisitics of mandrel and crimp bends, a while back. there was almost no difference between crimping and mandrel at angles of 45 deg or less. Greater than 45 starts to collapse the pipe.

For 90deg bends, crimping pretty much squeezes the pipe closed. If you take the heat shield off of your stock exhaust, you'll see what I'm talking about. The shop I buy my stuff from sells "U" mandrel bends and I cut the "U" in half to get my 90deg bend.
That does seem about right. Just thinking of a flexible straw at full extension vs one compressed and bent (I know the former isn't exactly a perfect example of a mandrel bend, but you get the point) you can see that there's very little difference until you start making more extreme bends. I still prefer mandrel bends to press bends whenever possible though. It's become a matter of principle with me, if not one of practicality.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 04:52 AM
  #11  
KillahB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
You can easily jack the car up, and figure out what bends you need, and just buy the mandrels to suit .... if your shop doesnt sell the mandrel ones like Alchy's shop.

Mandrel of course flows best. I too prefer mandrel (even though the Mirage's exhaust was press bent but with a 3 inch exhaust, i wasnt too worried).
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2005 | 04:51 PM
  #12  
rpmnz's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: New Zealand
yeah could have gone 2.25 mandrel on my mivec lancer. But too pricey and went for 2.5 inch with compression bends. You would have marginal gains going for a mandrel system but really would be hard to notice. With my car being NA it likes a bit of back pressure so not really an issue to go to compression bends.

If your not worried about the extra cost then of course go for mandrel. I dont even have mandrel headers. I just got my custom set made out of slightly larger diameter.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88888
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
6
Jun 9, 2015 08:49 AM
oliverevoIV
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
2
Apr 20, 2015 09:06 PM
OneSlowX
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Feb 27, 2015 08:36 AM
evo8-1479
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Feb 6, 2015 07:15 PM
Evo325
Evo Electrical / Audio / Security
9
Apr 28, 2011 10:50 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:46 AM.