Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Synthetic Oil = BAD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #121  
Shingen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by silverEVO8
Yeah, it's OK to change to regular oil........
Cool, cause right now it's colder than a witches tit and I don't want to be fooling with changing the oil myself right now.

Fox
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #122  
redozrally's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: Boonies
holy cow its that bad to use synthetic eh...
even if you use the thicker blend? or is there no thicker blend?
I heard a lot of people using Royal Purple on their lancers...
so those people will blow their motors sooner than
those who use regular oil?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 07:47 PM
  #123  
EVIIIL 8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
There is absolutley NO TOLERANCE in the bearings in an EVO for regular oil..if you want knocking within 200-300 miles, use the regular..synthetic sticks to everything and doesn't break down..its common sense
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 07:51 PM
  #124  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by EVIIIL 8
There is absolutley NO TOLERANCE in the bearings in an EVO for regular oil..if you want knocking within 200-300 miles, use the regular..synthetic sticks to everything and doesn't break down..its common sense
This is in the regular Lancer forums, ace.

If someone has a compelling, conclusive, logical, even scientific reason for claiming synthetic oil as the cause of their engine failure I'd love to see it. I've yet to see anything remotely convincing.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #125  
newbiewonkenobe's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: MidWest
I go back and forth on my tacoma all the time ($$ depending). I've never had a problem other than dorks who can't tighten an oil pan bolt, I guess that's irrelevant through
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #126  
EVIIIL 8's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by HobieKopek
This is in the regular Lancer forums, ace.

If someone has a compelling, conclusive, logical, even scientific reason for claiming synthetic oil as the cause of their engine failure I'd love to see it. I've yet to see anything remotely convincing.
thanks for clearing up my mistake, ace
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 07:11 AM
  #127  
Kurt's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,123
Likes: 1
From: Maryland.
Originally Posted by HobieKopek
If someone has a compelling, conclusive, logical, even scientific reason for claiming synthetic oil as the cause of their engine failure I'd love to see it. I've yet to see anything remotely convincing.
I would like to see that too. I have ran synthetic oil in my Lancer since the first oil change. Now with 40,000 plus miles on it, I have no problems. I use synthetic in my wife's car, and after 52,000 miles, there has not been a problem.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2006 | 08:02 AM
  #128  
x838nwy's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok
In the name of all that is holy, this thread is almost 2.5 years old!!!

Anyway, I have to call BS on this one too. And really a very late medal to TEXSRT4. All these post saying synthetics are too thin... strange as it may seem, there are several grades.

Now as DF said, viscosity is viscosity. There's no magic between synths and normal viscosity-wise. The numbers tell the story.

As i recall, non-synths actually contain a broader range of viscosity values which average to the overall viscosity....

If it's the oil's fault, i would love to see it. We'll soon be putting lard into our cars cos these new-fangled oils are just too darn thin!!
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 02:28 PM
  #129  
rcefstsfecr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
RRM told me NEVER to run synth. in a turbo'd Lancer. So i'm not even running a blend. I think it's 5/10w30/50 in mine. No problems being boosted or n/a.
Reply
Old Feb 4, 2006 | 02:38 PM
  #130  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I think that has to do with the effect of heat on synthetic oil, but I'm not too sure. For the average person it makes no difference, I run synthetic oil currently just cause I wanted to.
Reply
Old Feb 5, 2006 | 03:01 AM
  #131  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
Originally Posted by rcefstsfecr
RRM told me NEVER to run synth. in a turbo'd Lancer. So i'm not even running a blend. I think it's 5/10w30/50 in mine. No problems being boosted or n/a.
RRM was one of the sources of this rumor when Kontra spun a rod some years back. The viscosity rating is what determines the oil's "thickness", not whether it came from a dynosaur or a lab. Synthetics actually tend to degrade less (and therefore lubricate better than dino oil) under extreme heat.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #132  
LancerAdam's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Athol MA
I have been running Synthetic in my Lancer since day one with no problem at all. Look at my sig for how my engin is set up!
Synthetic oil is a good choice if you have a vehicle with a high performance engine (in fact synthetic is required for many of these engines). It is also a good choice if your vehicle is operated in extremely cold climates. It has higher resistance to breakdown caused by heat and it flows better in extreme cold. Unfortunately for the synthetic oil industry there is virtually no advantage to using synthetic oil in a non-high performance engine that is operated in moderate climates. You probably could go a bit longer between oil changes with a synthetic, i.e. following the normal service schedule even if you fall into the severe service category, but I wouldn't advise this. In short, synthetic may give you the peace of mind of knowing that you are using an oil that is far better than necessary for your vehicle, but it won't reduce wear or extend the life of the engine.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2006 | 08:40 PM
  #133  
mtags24's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
I've been running mobil 1 synthetic on my car for about 5,000 miles now with no problems to report. When i went in for my 15,000 maintenance an oil change comes included and I asked them if synthetic was bad and they said absolutely not and put that in instead (for an extra 20 of course). The mitsu tech was confident that it would be fine for the car (yeah i know any tech can be wrong but come on, this guy really seemed to know his stuff). so if the dealership will put it in, logic would dictate it is ok for the car. i know this doesn't prove anything, but maybe it helps
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 07:16 AM
  #134  
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 3
From: Concord Township, Ohio
Synthetic is fine. Why we have this debate after all these years, I don't know...
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2006 | 07:31 AM
  #135  
Kordwood's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Vestal, NY
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
Synthetic is fine. Why we have this debate after all these years, I don't know...
True. There are now so many urban legends about motor oil they should give it a show on the Discovery Channel.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:09 AM.