4B11 dyno list
#19
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its me. And it looks as if the Mitsu 153 hp rating is right on the money (given the 15-20% drivetrain lost). I will going to another dyno from a different shop to compare the numbers. All pulls were done in 4th gear. I still think something may have been wrong with the dyno though. The first pull was only 111 hp!! Then it jumped to 123. Does that sound odd to anyone else????
The important thing to take note is that the tq no longer falls on its face at the 5000 rmp mark. It keeps pulling all the way to redline (6500).
The important thing to take note is that the tq no longer falls on its face at the 5000 rmp mark. It keeps pulling all the way to redline (6500).
#20
EvoM Staff Alumni
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Cheers for being the first to get it done. I'm still waiting for my friend to hook me up with a cheap run...
#23
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#24
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First realize something: Your dyno on the y axis covers 40 - 140, while the other covers 0 - 200.
I am not seeing the original one fall on its face at 5000. You have a wider spread on the Y axis which gives it a bit more ground to cover so it only looks like it is taking a huge drop.
Both dynos start to significantly drop at 5500 and once again, yours has a smaller Y axis to cover so it drops at a slower angle, but generally in the same fashion that the original one does.
#25
Evolved Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here we go....
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
#26
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here we go....
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
#28
Evolved Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#29
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC ; Statesville, NC
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Here we go....
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
This is the main reason why I didn't want to post these numbers until they were verified. If anyone, ANYONE, doubts that this thing pulls harder and runs faster, I challenge you to come to Texas and I will let you drive the car or I will run you in your stock Lancer. Period.
#30
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: tsukuba turn 4
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
is that chart a baseline or after the piggy? one chart without the other is plain useless. we all know cars will get different ratings even on the same dyno.
possibly the lancer lent to evom was a bit more powerful like some press cars are known to be??? even with the new sae hp ratings 140 whp seemed quite high. especially when you consider that every review talks about how weak the engine is and i don't think a 140 whp car would feel that weak, cvt or not. now 123 whp is more inline with the factory hp rating and with what the reviews have been saying.
possibly the lancer lent to evom was a bit more powerful like some press cars are known to be??? even with the new sae hp ratings 140 whp seemed quite high. especially when you consider that every review talks about how weak the engine is and i don't think a 140 whp car would feel that weak, cvt or not. now 123 whp is more inline with the factory hp rating and with what the reviews have been saying.