4B11 dyno list
#1
EvoM Staff Alumni
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
4B11 dyno list
Manual transmission
EvoM test mule from Mitsubishi (article here) - 2008 ES, Fed (?)
Modifications: NONE
142.1 whp, 143 ft-lbs on DYNOmite dynamometer (gear unknown)
(Click here for graph.)
-
SeRious08 - 2008 GTS, Fed (?)
Modifications: RRM piggyback, RRM pulley, Apex'i N1 muffler
122.85 whp, 123.39 ft-lbs on DynoJet dynamometer (4th gear)
(Click here for graph.)
-
Works - 2008 Lancer GTS, PZEV-spec
Modifications: Works drop-in filter, Works Exhale axleback
132.3 whp, 131.3 ft-lbs on Dynapack dynamometer (4th gear)
Click for graph (or see post 87)
-
MaRcO_GTS86's 2008 GTS, Canada-spec (152chp, same as Fed spec)
Modifications: RRM SRI, customized greddy cat-back exhaust, RRM pulley, customized intake heat shield.
Max HP: 154; Max TQ: 146 on DynoJet dyno (4th gear)
Click for graph
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
CVT transmission
kmxxbadboy - 2008 GTS, unknown Fed or PZEV (lives in NJ, so most likely PZEV)
Modifications:NONE
Multiple runs (HP then TQ):
"3rd gear" - 113.89 115.72 & 119.13 118.35
"D" - 126.77 116.59
on DynoJet dynamometer
(Click here for graph.)
-
Jake26 - 2008 GTS, Fed-spec
Modifications: RRM intake, RRM exhaust, RRM pulley
HP TQ
114.8 92.7
119.4 109.2
124.7 108.1
on Dynocom dynamometer (CVT, 3rd or 4th)
(Click here for graph.)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Need more info
3 different cars from LancerGTS's dyno day - all three were PZEV engines, Dyno-Dynamics dyno
Lancer GTS 5 speed: RRM pully/piggy and Injen CAI and Injen Exhaust: 126.3 hp
Lancer GTS 5 speed: Injen CAI and Greddy Exhaust: 122.1hp Click for graph
Lancer GTS CVT: RRM pully/piggy and Injen CAI and custom shop exhaust: 100.5hp
Injen - 2008 Lancer, trim level unknown
Click for graphs: Exhaust, Intake/exhaust
on Dynojet dynamometer (unknown transmission, unknown gear)
Youtube dyno video - no car info, no dyno info, not 100% sure on results.
Google translation of Spanish language posts seems to say 143whp.
YouTube reply says "148 Horsepower with only exhaust."
_
_
EvoM test mule from Mitsubishi (article here) - 2008 ES, Fed (?)
Modifications: NONE
142.1 whp, 143 ft-lbs on DYNOmite dynamometer (gear unknown)
(Click here for graph.)
-
SeRious08 - 2008 GTS, Fed (?)
Modifications: RRM piggyback, RRM pulley, Apex'i N1 muffler
122.85 whp, 123.39 ft-lbs on DynoJet dynamometer (4th gear)
(Click here for graph.)
-
Works - 2008 Lancer GTS, PZEV-spec
Modifications: Works drop-in filter, Works Exhale axleback
132.3 whp, 131.3 ft-lbs on Dynapack dynamometer (4th gear)
Click for graph (or see post 87)
-
MaRcO_GTS86's 2008 GTS, Canada-spec (152chp, same as Fed spec)
Modifications: RRM SRI, customized greddy cat-back exhaust, RRM pulley, customized intake heat shield.
Max HP: 154; Max TQ: 146 on DynoJet dyno (4th gear)
Click for graph
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
CVT transmission
kmxxbadboy - 2008 GTS, unknown Fed or PZEV (lives in NJ, so most likely PZEV)
Modifications:NONE
Multiple runs (HP then TQ):
"3rd gear" - 113.89 115.72 & 119.13 118.35
"D" - 126.77 116.59
on DynoJet dynamometer
(Click here for graph.)
-
Jake26 - 2008 GTS, Fed-spec
Modifications: RRM intake, RRM exhaust, RRM pulley
HP TQ
114.8 92.7
119.4 109.2
124.7 108.1
on Dynocom dynamometer (CVT, 3rd or 4th)
(Click here for graph.)
-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Need more info
3 different cars from LancerGTS's dyno day - all three were PZEV engines, Dyno-Dynamics dyno
Lancer GTS 5 speed: RRM pully/piggy and Injen CAI and Injen Exhaust: 126.3 hp
Lancer GTS 5 speed: Injen CAI and Greddy Exhaust: 122.1hp Click for graph
Lancer GTS CVT: RRM pully/piggy and Injen CAI and custom shop exhaust: 100.5hp
Injen - 2008 Lancer, trim level unknown
Click for graphs: Exhaust, Intake/exhaust
on Dynojet dynamometer (unknown transmission, unknown gear)
Youtube dyno video - no car info, no dyno info, not 100% sure on results.
Google translation of Spanish language posts seems to say 143whp.
YouTube reply says "148 Horsepower with only exhaust."
_
_
Last edited by Blacksheepdj; Mar 16, 2008 at 12:23 PM. Reason: Updated
#2
See there HP rating of 152 HP is off there is NO way you are only losing 10 HP from crank to the wheels! I wounder what the true HP at the crank is 160-170?
Thanks for the post SHEEP RRM
And the 04 RA was rated at like 163 HP and it was only putin 134WHP down. So mitsu has low balled there HP rating for the new 08 Lancer.
Thanks for the post SHEEP RRM
And the 04 RA was rated at like 163 HP and it was only putin 134WHP down. So mitsu has low balled there HP rating for the new 08 Lancer.
Last edited by show time; May 30, 2007 at 06:51 PM.
#6
EvoM Staff Alumni
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
(If you didn't know, the results on a Mustang dyno are generally 85% of DynoJet, etc.)
Trending Topics
#8
only a 10hp loss? very interesting. I cannot remember exactly but my 02 RSX Type-S had 200hp and when dyno'd it only had 165(ish) layed down to the wheels. Hmm...Im curious if this number is underrated - what would the actual number be closer to??
#9
EvoM Staff Alumni
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
An example being that WRXs have always been listed as 227 HP, yet despite Subaru upping the engine from 2L to 2.5L, it is now rated at 224 CHP. The car is most likely more powerful than before, it's just rated differently.
#13
#15
EvoM Staff Alumni
Thread Starter
iTrader: (88)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
didn't intentionally underrate it. The SAE standards for measuring HP changed. Please try to understand that. Research it a bit more if you need to.