its only 3rd gear if your car isnt powerful enough to make it in a short time in 1:1

 

I would like to note that he has a Cali spec lancer...not a 152 HP fed standard rated lancer. If that is not the case...then ignore my comment...

 

Ummm, no. Car was bought in Texas. Recieving port from Mitsubishi was Galveston Texas.

 

Sorry i misread what was posted. It was lancerGts quoting you.

 

2008BLACKGTS is correct. Often, you can use 3rd or 4th because they're both usually a small way away from 1:1 (usually one above and one below, obviously).

 

My whole point on that was the people who Dyno'ed for Seruios8 should have know which gear to do the pulls in "3rd gear"(Ratio 1.3). And its better to do the pulls in the gear that is a little over 1:1 rather then under that. This whole thing is still just a bytch fest. The best way to really get some people to pay attention will have to be 1/4 mile times because we have a stock time set at 15.9 but then again everybody will just start bytchn about the track was running slow or it was to humid or you should have ripped all your mods off then ran then put them all back on and ran again. Cant keep everybody happy I know I am happy with my RRM mods and they for damn sure make a noticeable difference so I guess the only way people are going to truly find out is if the purchase some mods and see for them self. And thus far I haven't seen anybody complaining about any of RRM's mods so people will just have to trust word of mouth.

 

The bottom line is that this thread is just here to publish dyno numbers from our members. No one should really be *****ing at all because it's just a place to see what other people got. Yeah, you can have this or that problem with someone's numbers, but none of it really matters. Hell, we haven't even had two cars use the same type of dyno yet. There's NOTHING that could be compared.

 

I am assuming these A/F numbers were done at the tailpipe, is this correct? It would be nice to get some numbers before the cat.

 

Well i dynoed my car today, its a cvt, it was really hard to get resanable numbers due to CVT tranny. mine look like this.

 

OUCH those numbers suck. What was the problem with them doing pulls with the CVT? But thank you for going and getting this done and posting.

 

i really dont know, may be he could not caliberate the dyno for a cvt. So i am not sure about that, but my WHP look close to what the other guy had done above. i knew that cvt would be a problem with HP. I guess i should have waited 4 more weeks for the 5sp!.

 

These Numbers are hard to compare to the others. This is a different dyno. I don't know the temp differences on each run, or the differences in altitude. So unless some one dynos a cvt vs. a manual and a modded car vs. a stock one on the same dyno at the same temp, we are just speculating. Though I imagine the cvt does rob some power

 

I know it was a different dyno, but your TQ was way lower than mine. Grant it, I have the RRM piggy-back and Rob has always claimed that the tq was raised. Your 124 hp is right in line with mine.

Your max TQ: 109.2 with CVT
My max TQ: 123.4 with manual, RRM piggy-back

 

How did they run it? In "D" or in "manual" mode? If "manual," what "gear?"

 

Its a bytch to get that all together at once but that would be very nice. And they should have done his pulls in manual in third gear. I would be interested to see what a stock GTS WHP is compared to yours with mods Jake.