The extra 4 hp came from the other GTS having the Injen full catback exhaust system, while I just had the Greddy axel back exhaust.

The piggy and pully did not bring any extra hp. BUT, there were differences in our graphs that were extremely noticable that could be contributed to those two items:

1. His graph climb started a full 750 RPM before mine did. I would image this would be the pully.

2. His was smoother than mine. Mine had a few flat spots where as his was a more steady curve. Really this could be anything in the end.

But really in the end the piggy is only going to really help you if you mod the car and actually spend a full day at a shop tuning it.

 

then why spend 400 + on a chip that is supposed to be preprogrammed to take advantage of pully,intake and exhaust. but not do that? I own the chip and is still installed. But i feel like the biggest fool to spend so much money on it.

 

keep in mind a couple elements to this number:

-you can multiply the dyno numbers by %20 to achieve roughly the same numbers you might get from a dyno-jet. (in case numbers are your thing)
-also keep in mind this was a MODDED- CVT. the numbers could have literally been lower had it not been modified. (so expect lower numbers in this case if your stock)
-In direct relation to Torque #'s me and another 5speed hit exactly 160 lbs, while the CVT only hit 130lbs. The engine is pushing itself quiet nicely from a torque stand-point. CVT or not.

 

Well let me ask you this: Why would RRM pre-program their piggy to to take advantage of Injen parts?

Think your way through that and it should answer most of your questions.

 

here is a dyno that we did on a 5spd federal lancer

blue - stock
red - piggy only
green - cai piggy


the cold air lost power that is why we didnt produce it.


i am wondering though on the cars with the Injen parts, i thought Injen posted a dyno say 9hp from the intake and 9hp from the exhaust?

so i mean that is close to 20h i didnt see that much gain.

 

LancerGTS,

Here you go.

 

Thanks Blacksheep!

 

Microsoft Paint to the rescue!

 

im almost positive its not as low as you guys are saying..

i have a toyota supra and i used to have a 97 dodge avenger the stats on the avenger was 161hp and 160lbs of tq

with that being said i had it all the way up to last week when i wrecked it and decided to get a lancer..my girlfirend has had one since launch

i have raced her countless times with my avneger to the floor and in overdrive when hers was in auto mode not even useing CVT or paddleshifters. and every time we would be at the same speed all the way to about 70mph and then i would start to slighly gain ahead..but as far as 0-60 i think the lancer could have beat my avenger if she knew how to use the CVT good

so i highly doubt its pushing 140tq and hp like some say

 

niiiiccceee... I especially love the coffee cup stains on the sheet

 

yeah as ive posted before theres no way this car is like 138 hp and 140tq stock..no way in the world..my dodge 97 dodge avenger when i had it (167hp 161tq stock) i once raced (not illegally) and they were neck and neck from 0-70 then my avenger slightly started to pull ahead.. not to mention my avenger had a v6 in it and was also made by mitsubishi..and even check this..when i did race the lancer in my avenger it was in AUTO mode not even CVT or let alone a manual.

so find that very hard to believe

 

ok so you guys are saying that fed card dyno at 138 stock right? Because I bought my car in Cali and the guys at hks said my car dynod at 138. I'm going to check this out haha

 

Every dyno is different. Look at the first post. Cars with the same mods get different numbers. Dyno results are just something fun to compare. Don't think they're all the same.

 

couple thoughts: this car ways 3,000 pounds, has 2 liter engine and somehow gets to 60 in the 9 second range (depending on transmission). factoring in some of the dyno tests here which are reading in the 120's and below for hp and that's pretty incredible. If this engine were operating in say a coupe version of the same car, say a third less than now the acceleration times would be 3/2 faster. (this figure is in m/s for acceleration times so you would have to change units for seconds).

and in regard to dyno tests, they're kind of like asking people how much they bench. ego boosting and often exaggerated.

 

Dyno is for the Hi-Power axelback exhaust from HKS for our '08 Lancers.(Dyno'd at HKS here in L.A.)