Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Dyno'd lancers list

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 07:28 AM
  #136  
comatose721's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
they couldn't get an RPM reading from my car so all i got was AFR and HP readings. i was a little dissappointed. i was hoping for 115 and only hit 108.88 i still have an exhaust leak to fix though. ...not to mention leaning out a little more would help. results were recorded on a DynoJet in a 4th gear pull.

Mods list: CAI, 4g94 P&P Intake Mani, Custom P&P Exhaust Mani, 2.25in Downpipe, 2.25in Cat Back, PB ECU v.1.0, Magnacore Plug Wires, RRM CS Pulley, Clutchmasters Flywheel, Kaaz LSD, RRM Big Bore Fuel Rail.

i'm not going to bother with correcting the AFR's. i don't have the software and it would be deemed useless once i toss EMS in the car. but there's some numbers to start with for me.

mark
Attached Thumbnails Dyno'd lancers list-dyno-sheet-000.jpg  
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 07:46 AM
  #137  
gregivq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
I'm really suprised it's so low. Once the exhaus leak is fixed it would definitaly jump up. What EMS are you getting?
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 08:04 AM
  #138  
comatose721's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
AEM EMS...that won't be till next spring though. i'm more concerned with boosting first. then i can tune that fuel map until i get the AEM in the car...i was talking to the guy who did the dyno and he said if i were to correct the AFR's alone they should yeild 5-10+ ......12.6:1 is pretty rich. i figure between correcting that and fixing my exhaust leak i could HOPEFULLY make 120whp....then again, that's only wishful thinking.

btw, my engine is starting to feel a little.....let's say, tired. it doesn't have the same up-and-go that it used too. the high miles might be started to have an adverse effect (64k)
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 10:09 AM
  #139  
gregivq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
^I have 90k miles but also rebuild engine, dunno if that matters, it still feels fine. You just need a really good tune up.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 10:39 AM
  #140  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
No, 12.6 is right where you want to be with this engine- the ECU is tuned for 10.5-11 depending on the weather. C'mon man, you've read the posts, you know Boe has seen dudes tune for 13.5 and melt stuff. Don't get greedy. It's a sad fact that this engine does not respond well to basic and even more advanced mods (ported manifolds and fuel tuning for example). Mitsu gave us about as much as they could get out of the G93 by boring it out to 1.998L. Dave at RPW has been saying this since the car came out- even with cam, twin TB, headwork, exhaust, pistons and eManage you're not going to break 160 NA. I don't know how the G69 engine mods but I imagine it's more responsive to basic stuff. Your exhaust leak won't be a miracle solution but might get you to break the 120 mark and it will stop feeling anemic. If you have a test pipe or high flow cat you might want to put the stock cat back on... but you can find the pages and pages of discussion about why that does/does not work- I won't start it again here

I really am being sympathetic- check my mods list It shouldn't come as any surprise that I'm not rushing to spend the money do the next mods
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #141  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
I know this is not really a big discussion thread but I just wanted to throw in me 2c.

Although you custom ported the stock exhaust manifold it is probably still restrictive enough to disallow proper air flow from the engine. You have a whole bunch more air coming in but it still probably doesn't have the room to exit.

With your mods list that is the only thing I see that might hinder performance.

WADAD
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 08:20 PM
  #142  
comatose721's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 2
From: Toms River, NJ
my goal is to hit 120whp before boosting. i need to do a really good tune up like greg said. i'm picking up another RRM header and fixing up my leaks. if that doesn't help then so be it. boosting will be next. thanks for the input.

btw, i still have a cat on the car.
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2006 | 10:48 PM
  #143  
twisty1251's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: lake forest, CA
you should be able to hit 120whp with a header and a nice tune
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:07 AM
  #144  
blaze_125's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally Posted by Alchemist
No, 12.6 is right where you want to be with this engine- the ECU is tuned for 10.5-11 depending on the weather. C'mon man, you've read the posts, you know Boe has seen dudes tune for 13.5 and melt stuff.
What I got from Boe a while ago.

Originally Posted by Boe
NA try to stay around 13:1 for 91+

Around 12.5-12.8:1 for 87-89 octane.
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2006 | 06:33 AM
  #145  
gregivq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
^+1

13.1 and then just work the timing.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #146  
iyi0521's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
I was at the same Dyno day at CNFX on sat. Here is my results.



Once again no TQ because they could not get a proper rpm reading.

116.57 HP

I only had the Catback, RRM Piggy, and RMR intake at the time.

Im not sure about the AFR. What is Stocih again?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #147  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
14.7:1 for gasoline
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #148  
twisty1251's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
From: lake forest, CA
Originally Posted by iyi0521
I was at the same Dyno day at CNFX on sat. Here is my results.



Once again no TQ because they could not get a proper rpm reading.

116.57 HP

I only had the Catback, RRM Piggy, and RMR intake at the time.

Im not sure about the AFR. What is Stocih again?
not bad. with a header and a pulley you should be over 120hp/tq
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 05:55 PM
  #149  
iyi0521's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Souderton PA
im running lean then huh?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 06:01 PM
  #150  
Z_Lancer_Man's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (115)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 4
From: Albuquerque, NM
By the looks of it you are running lean.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:43 PM.