Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Dyno'd lancers list

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #91  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
*******.... just got off a dynojet 248 and posted some crap numbers. Not sure what the problem is, but here's a pic (fawking snapfish )


3rd gear pulls made a whopping 111WHP and 115TQ

Guess that means the Auterra PDA dyno isn't that far off, huh Rhyzin
Attached Thumbnails Dyno'd lancers list-my-pulls.jpg  

Last edited by engineerboy; Feb 19, 2005 at 05:36 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #92  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Link doesn't work but sorry about the numbers.

WADAD
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 05:37 PM
  #93  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
my guess is the head is ported too aggressively for the cam, or that I still need to bring more air in . . . . . not at all sure what's up
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2005 | 08:40 PM
  #94  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
your torque curve looks great actually... i'd take out some of that fuel up top to pick up some torque and hp. Your still running a 12:1 ratio up high... usually i try to keep it closer to 13:1 on the NA application. Also i've been able to push about 8 degrees advance timing below 4k rpms... then do 6 at 4500... 4 at 5k to redline. All on a 13:1 ratio running 91 octane. When you get your cam set it up for 2 degrees advance with this tune on you emanage and you should be well over 125whp.

Maybe you can make the above changes and redyno. This info is what i've done with the emanage on the lancer already. It's not to aggressive but for 91 it's safe and sound. Good luck.

Originally Posted by engineerboy
my guess is the head is ported too aggressively for the cam, or that I still need to bring more air in . . . . . not at all sure what's up
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 05:29 AM
  #95  
omarboy25's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Talking 308 Whp 300tq @18psi

heres the thread for those numbers
i finally did it!!

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...ad.php?t=94038
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 08:20 AM
  #96  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
Originally Posted by engineerboy
*******.... just got off a dynojet 248 and posted some crap numbers. Not sure what the problem is, but here's a pic (fawking snapfish )


3rd gear pulls made a whopping 111WHP and 115TQ

Guess that means the Auterra PDA dyno isn't that far off, huh Rhyzin
Is that basically your bolt-ons? If so, it's looks kinda right, but it's a bit on the low side. If it's w/ cam work, it isn't right.

Maybe, you need to dyno it again via Auterra PDA. At least try to eliminate the possibilty of driver error on the pull. Then again, 3rd gear isn't exactly 1:1 (gear ratio), and I know it's hard to find enough room to pull 4th gear.
Reply
Old May 7, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #97  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
119.4 hp@5500 rpm

115.1 tq@ 4500 rpm

Untuned
3rd gear pull
Mustange dyno
check here for more info:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...=134541&page=3

WADAD
Reply
Old May 12, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #98  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
Since I've been tinkering, I thought I'd add a couple notes to my previous posts.
First, that dyno was before cam or timing work, so that wasn't the issue.
Second, exhaust leaks suck. however, thread lock is our friend and once that leak between the header and dp was fixed, it was like night and day.... I wish I'd taken care of that before.
Also, that wasn't with "bolt ons" exactly. I'd like to argue that a ported intake manifold, ported head and eManage running the 16X16 fuel map is a little more advanced than just bolt ons. Or you could argue that every modification to the car is just unbolting something to bolt something else on, so it's all bolt on mods

I'm really hoping to get to a drag strip by the end of the month for soem 1/4 mile times. and since I'm taking tomorrow off from work, I'm going to try to get to some roads that are away from cops and do some auterra dyno runs that are of good quality.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #99  
Alchemist's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,204
Likes: 0
From: Lynnwood, WA
Stage 2 cam installed.

2 PDA dyno pulls tonight: 1st at 132/130 and the 2nd was 134/134 (actually got a weird spike to 477HP, but we'll stop paying attention to the data when it stops making any sense).

The curves aren't great and I know there's more power available.... it's just gonna take some time to find it. Over 4K RPM feels great though.

eManage users: get the timing harness, advance in the lower RPM range and start retarding at 3K.
Reply
Old Aug 9, 2005 | 07:52 AM
  #100  
GreenPsycho's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 1
From: Kansas Now/Louisiana/Connecticut
oh oh! can i play too?

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...01#post2237501

done on a dynojet, 3rd gear (auto), @ 11 pounds of boost. Mods are: RIPP Stage 2 SDS, bored throttle body, ported 4g93 intake manifold, kamikaze headers, magnaflow high flow cat, magnaflow catback.

Thanks
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 02:02 AM
  #101  
rhyzin's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: From SLO to San Jose
tadaa

if there has been any that i missed, i appreciate anybody pointing them out so i could add them.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:16 AM
  #102  
blaze_125's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Here is my Auterra run:

Last edited by blaze_125; Jan 18, 2006 at 08:56 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 04:28 AM
  #103  
rhyzin's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: From SLO to San Jose
wow. you weigh 300 lbs, or you got a system in the car?
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 06:47 AM
  #104  
blaze_125's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,731
Likes: 1
From: QC
Originally Posted by rhyzin
wow. you weigh 300 lbs, or you got a system in the car?
I weight 120lbs, my sound system is 60lbs, I have sunroof, ABS + 1/4 tank of gas and my wheels are slightly heavier than stock OZ wheels. So I figured it would round up to 300Lbs. You guys have any idea of the weight of the ABS system and Sunroof assy?

Last edited by blaze_125; Sep 6, 2005 at 06:52 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #105  
rhyzin's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: From SLO to San Jose
is it the whole motorized sunroof assy? the motors might do you in for weight. abs shouldn't weigh you down much at all. it should be just 4 small speed sensor sprockets, 4 speed sensors, and a kinda small brake distribution box.

here's how i'd break it down
2701 -> car's full weight(all fluids full), 5MT, w/AC
-50 -> 1/4 tank at 6.25 lbs per gallon in 12 gallon tank
+60 -> sound system
+32 -> dsm sunroof weight full assy with motors for comparison
+15 -> larger rims
+15 -> abs, prob weighs less
+120 -> you
2893 lbs
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:36 PM.