a question for you exhaust nuts...
I had it on my car for 2 years, and the previous owner had it on his for who knows how long. It still looked very decent, and still did the job it was intended to do.
Con:
The material used to build it is thinner than RRM so it is running louder and hotter that RRM's.
Con:
The material used to build it is thinner than RRM so it is running louder and hotter that RRM's.
After installing it on a friend's car, I'm not happy with Kamikaze either. Fitment wasn't great. It's a good deal and I'm sure any problems can be worked around if you're inventive, but I was hoping for a better product. The DP shouldn't be hitting/rattling when you pay for a retail product.
I have heard some bad things about kamikaze header setups. mostly cracked pipes and clanking downpipes etc. I would rather get a product where i am almost assured great quality.
You aren't really thinking on this one.
The fact that it's flow tested MEANS NOTHING. If you flow test the RRM and then compare it to the flow test of another header and see that the RRM flows better, THEN it would make the RRM better.
That's like saying my Lancer is better than yours because I ran mine on a dyno and you didn't.
The fact that it's flow tested MEANS NOTHING. If you flow test the RRM and then compare it to the flow test of another header and see that the RRM flows better, THEN it would make the RRM better.
That's like saying my Lancer is better than yours because I ran mine on a dyno and you didn't.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
