Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

Good bye, Evo.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:08 AM
  #1  
Varrius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Good bye, Evo. (copy)

I sold my Evo IX with 13,700 miles on it, on Saturday. I got $28,500 for it with all of its modifications. When it left me it had 338 Whp and 340 Wtq on a Mustang Dyno. I'm now a proud owner of a 2007 Cadillac CTS-V. Since 2006 they now manufacture them with the lighter LS2, instead of the LS6. This lightened it up from the previous 3,800lbs to 3,500lbs. It's a bit more nimble because of this. At least, I think so. The vehicle is built much better than the Evo, it has the same, if not better stock straight-line acceleration. Mine came outfitted with the suspension upgrade, corsa exhaust, as well as a carbon fiber engine dress-up kit. I enjoyed owning the Evo, I may get a X when they come out, or perhaps not. It all depends on how it looks and drives.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #2  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Talking

Sorry to hear you sold your EVO, welcome to the 60^ yr crowd .
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:13 AM
  #3  
eve-slow's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,051
Likes: 1
From: St. Charles, IL
Will it go around a track as fast as an EVO?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #4  
FJF's Avatar
FJF
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 7
From: NYS
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Thank goodness...


That carbon fiber engine dress-up kit would have sold me, too. ;-)
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:14 AM
  #5  
Player1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
From: Columbus
what about handling? Acceleration from a roll or dig is better?
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #6  
ak47po's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,835
Likes: 3
From: out
It get's to Bingo night awful quick.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #7  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Comes with a comp AARP membership
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:16 AM
  #8  
evo637's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, Ca
Originally Posted by Varrius
I sold my Evo IX with 13,700 miles on it, on Saturday. I got $28,500 for it with all of its modifications. When it left me it had 338 Whp and 340 Wtq on a Mustang Dyno. I'm now a proud owner of a 2007 Cadillac CTS-V. Since 2006 they now manufacture them with the lighter LS2, instead of the LS6. This lightened it up from the previous 3,800lbs to 3,500lbs. It's a bit more nimble because of this. At least, I think so. The vehicle is built much better than the Evo, it has the same, if not better stock straight-line acceleration. Mine came outfitted with the suspension upgrade, corsa exhaust, as well as a carbon fiber engine dress-up kit. I enjoyed owning the Evo, I may get a X when they come out, or perhaps not. It all depends on how it looks and drives.
I love how they sound at WOT(its like a jet engine). It's to bad the're too slow around corners.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #9  
Varrius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Originally Posted by eve-slow
Will it go around a track as fast as an EVO?
The CTS-V R does good in SCCA, they won quite a few races with them. I'm not sure, I think it would depend entirely on the driver. The car handles excellent with the upgraded suspension. A lot of turns you can just drift or power-over into, so, it would depend on the track as well.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #10  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
It's a good pimpin' car :}
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #11  
value's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 1
From: Evergreen state
Sorry to bust on ya bro, but that is the only caddy that is worthwhile to me.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #12  
Varrius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
I'm going to supercharge it and go with the Lingenfelter suspension, so in the end, I think it will be a monster.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #13  
Varrius's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: Alaska
Originally Posted by value
Comes with a comp AARP membership
Funny part is, I have AARP " The Hartford " insurance, through my parents policy. Costs me $87 a month to insure my CTS-V.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #14  
Tristar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,572
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Varrius
The CTS-V R does good in SCCA, they won quite a few races with them. I'm not sure, I think it would depend entirely on the driver. The car handles excellent with the upgraded suspension. A lot of turns you can just drift or power-over into, so, it would depend on the track as well.
Not to burst your bubble, but I had a Grassroots motorsports article where they reviewed the Caddy program, and those cars have the shell of the production vehicle in common and not much more. They have won races, but again not applicable to the production vehicles capabilities.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2006 | 10:21 AM
  #15  
EVOtagger's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by value
Sorry to bust on ya bro, but that is the only caddy that is worthwhile to me.


Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 PM.