Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

2008 sti ?? edmunds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 9, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #46  
Saotome9's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: ur mom's place
ugly as sin
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 08:19 AM
  #47  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
I came to no conclusion. I came to a speculation. Don't like it, don't read it. This is a discussion, and if you're not smart enough to participate without making ignorant statements to people just because you have a chip on your shoulder, then stay out of the thread.

Nobody needs you plaguing this thread with your rude comments. If you have a problem, you can continue to send me your stupid "your mom" PMs that you've been sending me for the past 4 months if it makes you feel better.
Your comments about the Evo X don't belong in this thread. You don't know what the capabilites of Mitsus open deck design are, you have no idea how capable the new chassis is, and comparing it by adding 200lbs to the old one is dumb - Mitsu, Chrysler and Hyundai have been sharing ideas for many years. The 4G63 is found in some older Hyundais. They've shared platforms before. So theres no need for concern. Those facts didn't keep the current Evo from being a world beater, and they won't keep the next one either. It is in Mitsubishi's and only Mitsubishi's hands to determine wether the Evo X is a better car or not then the Evo IX.

After you got owned in the last thread where you tried to show your intellectual prowess - you first sent me a PM riddled with lame insults and talking about my mom and everything else your immature mind could dream up, followed by dozens more. I find it funny you would actually try to twist the facts to try to make yourself look good.

Last edited by GPTourer; Feb 10, 2007 at 08:41 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #48  
Truedsmer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Thumbs down

Ahahahahahah sinistersubura got owned again! Dumb slowbaru owners these days.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #49  
Dinothegreat's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Cave Creek, AZ
I hate to say it, but I really like it. I think that is the best looking Subaru to date, and it looks much better that the Evo X. Also better looking than the MS3 and the GTI. Subaru might have a weiner here guys!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #50  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by GPTourer
Your comments about the Evo X don't belong in this thread. You don't know what the capabilites of Mitsus open deck design are, you have no idea how capable the new chassis is, and comparing it by adding 200lbs to the old one is dumb - Mitsu, Chrysler and Hyundai have been sharing ideas for many years. The 4G63 is found in some older Hyundais. They've shared platforms before. So theres no need for concern. Those facts didn't keep the current Evo from being a world beater, and they won't keep the next one either. It is in Mitsubishi's and only Mitsubishi's hands to determine wether the Evo X is a better car or not then the Evo IX.

After you got owned in the last thread where you tried to show your intellectual prowess - you first sent me a PM riddled with lame insults and talking about my mom and everything else your immature mind could dream up, followed by dozens more. I find it funny you would actually try to twist the facts to try to make yourself look good.
And while you're just digging your hole deeper, Mitsubishi had no say in the design of the Caliber platform that it's going to be based on! Keep'em coming, because you just continue to make yourself sound more uninformed with every post you make.

You talk like you have some idea of what Mitsubishi's open deck design capabilities are. You don't, so just stop right there.

You continuously make yourself look stupid by insulting me. Keep at it! Since according to YOU, I apparently sent you these "your mom" PMs first, how about if you prove it. That's right, you can't. Now, once again, quit bugging me like a child. I wouldn't even bother wasting my time talking about your parents. It's clear from your actions that your single parent was a petri dish.

While you're at it, since you seem to be so experienced with open/closed deck designs, it wouldn't be too much trouble for you to name the advantages and disadvantages of each design, would it?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #51  
Jax419's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 1
From: Lakeview, Chicago
I like the wingless version! i actually think it'll look better than the X
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #52  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Oh! Mister Sinister just got super owned!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 11:33 AM
  #53  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
Yeah, kinda like Motor Trend, Top Gear, Car & Driver, Road & Track, Automobile, Sport Compact Car, Sports Car Illustrated, etc. do.
And that's why most magazines suck the big one........They all talk out of their asses....Making up BS from their limited understanding of the subject matter....
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 11:35 AM
  #54  
Slowride's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Southeast US
The wingless version is 1000x better than the winged, but I still prefer the X. And I'm not a fanboy. I'm really glad they're dropping the fugly "flying snout" front-end. That just gives me the *******.

As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2007 | 12:09 PM
  #55  
GPTourer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,312
Likes: 3
From: Birmingham, AL
A big wing like that looks extra ricey on a hatch, so wingless the deisgn looks reasonable, but its till weak compared to the X. I think part of Subaru wants to be the appliance style, AWD for everyone car and the other part wants to be ***** to the wall takes no prisoners. That conflict seems to come out in their misidrected styling.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 02:16 AM
  #56  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by Slowride
The wingless version is 1000x better than the winged, but I still prefer the X. And I'm not a fanboy. I'm really glad they're dropping the fugly "flying snout" front-end. That just gives me the *******.

As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
Exactly, but the Evo fanboys are out in full force, as if they already know what the Evo's going to be. Right now, everything is speculation. They act like it isn't.

Silly fanboys.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #57  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by GPTourer
A big wing like that looks extra ricey on a hatch, so wingless the deisgn looks reasonable, but its till weak compared to the X. I think part of Subaru wants to be the appliance style, AWD for everyone car and the other part wants to be ***** to the wall takes no prisoners. That conflict seems to come out in their misidrected styling.
As usual, you're.....misdirected. But nice try for the effort! Appliance style? Considering the new Lancer looks like every other car on the road, that's quite the pot calling the kettle black! And isn't it Mitsubishi that's trying to go mainstream with the X? Uh huh.....that's what I thought.

You can talk out your *** all you want (and you surely do a good job of it) about how the styling is misdirected, and while I may painfully agree with you that it's not the best looking, we will see when it comes to market. You talk about how speculating is stupid, and yet you do the same thing. But, one thing's for sure, there won't be a Hyundai motor under the hood!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 03:59 AM
  #58  
Slowride's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Southeast US
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
But, one thing's for sure, there won't be a Hyundai motor under the hood!
Same is true of the X!
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 05:15 AM
  #59  
Sinister Subaru's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: Frederick, Maryland
Originally Posted by Slowride
Same is true of the X!
The X's motor will be a "global" motor shared with Dodge and Hyundai.
Reply
Old Feb 12, 2007 | 06:19 AM
  #60  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Originally Posted by Sinister Subaru
I don't frequent NUTSAC, but from what I've seen, they don't bash the Evo all that often.

As for fanboy status, this forum has more than its share, just the same.
True dat, but atleast our fan boys choose the better side. Sinister, hey come join the dark side, we've been waiting for you

Last edited by 3000ways; Feb 12, 2007 at 06:57 AM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:46 AM.