2008 sti ?? edmunds
I came to no conclusion. I came to a speculation. Don't like it, don't read it. This is a discussion, and if you're not smart enough to participate without making ignorant statements to people just because you have a chip on your shoulder, then stay out of the thread.
Nobody needs you plaguing this thread with your rude comments. If you have a problem, you can continue to send me your stupid "your mom" PMs that you've been sending me for the past 4 months if it makes you feel better.
Nobody needs you plaguing this thread with your rude comments. If you have a problem, you can continue to send me your stupid "your mom" PMs that you've been sending me for the past 4 months if it makes you feel better.
After you got owned in the last thread where you tried to show your intellectual prowess - you first sent me a PM riddled with lame insults and talking about my mom and everything else your immature mind could dream up, followed by dozens more. I find it funny you would actually try to twist the facts to try to make yourself look good.
Last edited by GPTourer; Feb 10, 2007 at 08:41 AM.
I hate to say it, but I really like it.
I think that is the best looking Subaru to date, and it looks much better that the Evo X. Also better looking than the MS3 and the GTI. Subaru might have a weiner here guys!
I think that is the best looking Subaru to date, and it looks much better that the Evo X. Also better looking than the MS3 and the GTI. Subaru might have a weiner here guys!
Your comments about the Evo X don't belong in this thread. You don't know what the capabilites of Mitsus open deck design are, you have no idea how capable the new chassis is, and comparing it by adding 200lbs to the old one is dumb - Mitsu, Chrysler and Hyundai have been sharing ideas for many years. The 4G63 is found in some older Hyundais. They've shared platforms before. So theres no need for concern. Those facts didn't keep the current Evo from being a world beater, and they won't keep the next one either. It is in Mitsubishi's and only Mitsubishi's hands to determine wether the Evo X is a better car or not then the Evo IX.
After you got owned in the last thread where you tried to show your intellectual prowess - you first sent me a PM riddled with lame insults and talking about my mom and everything else your immature mind could dream up, followed by dozens more. I find it funny you would actually try to twist the facts to try to make yourself look good.
After you got owned in the last thread where you tried to show your intellectual prowess - you first sent me a PM riddled with lame insults and talking about my mom and everything else your immature mind could dream up, followed by dozens more. I find it funny you would actually try to twist the facts to try to make yourself look good.

You talk like you have some idea of what Mitsubishi's open deck design capabilities are. You don't, so just stop right there.
You continuously make yourself look stupid by insulting me. Keep at it!
While you're at it, since you seem to be so experienced with open/closed deck designs, it wouldn't be too much trouble for you to name the advantages and disadvantages of each design, would it?
The wingless version is 1000x better than the winged, but I still prefer the X. And I'm not a fanboy. I'm really glad they're dropping the fugly "flying snout" front-end. That just gives me the *******.
As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
A big wing like that looks extra ricey on a hatch, so wingless the deisgn looks reasonable, but its till weak compared to the X. I think part of Subaru wants to be the appliance style, AWD for everyone car and the other part wants to be ***** to the wall takes no prisoners. That conflict seems to come out in their misidrected styling.
The wingless version is 1000x better than the winged, but I still prefer the X. And I'm not a fanboy. I'm really glad they're dropping the fugly "flying snout" front-end. That just gives me the *******.
As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
As usual, in Evo vs. STI contest, it's too close to call, especially at this time. Without final specs and pricing--not to mention production interiors/exteriors--there's nothing but hope, speculation, and FUD.
Silly fanboys.
A big wing like that looks extra ricey on a hatch, so wingless the deisgn looks reasonable, but its till weak compared to the X. I think part of Subaru wants to be the appliance style, AWD for everyone car and the other part wants to be ***** to the wall takes no prisoners. That conflict seems to come out in their misidrected styling.
You can talk out your *** all you want (and you surely do a good job of it) about how the styling is misdirected, and while I may painfully agree with you that it's not the best looking, we will see when it comes to market. You talk about how speculating is stupid, and yet you do the same thing. But, one thing's for sure, there won't be a Hyundai motor under the hood!
Last edited by 3000ways; Feb 12, 2007 at 06:57 AM.




