Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

wrc evo turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 06:59 PM
  #46  
Bimmubishi's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 764
Likes: 1
From: Boston
Originally Posted by SILVERnSLOW
What is the biggest MHI turbo out there, maybe that is what they used? I figure MHI would make turbos for larger applications such as machinery.

The largest that I know of is the TD15 which has a 5.9 inch compressor wheel. It's used on diesel freight ships.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #47  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Could they have gotten that load, even on the stock turbo, by running the engine on an engine dyno and loading it up much more than it would see in a car??
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #48  
codgi's Avatar
Evolved Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,493
Likes: 41
From: Atlanta, GA
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
i think 6 wasn't a WRC car . They where running as a GRp. A.
The VI was classified a WRC car. The WRC group was started in 1996/1997. But not every manufacturer in Group A switched to full WRC specs. This was allowed up until 2000 and thus how glorified Group A cars (such as the Ford Escort, Evo IV, V and VI) were allowed to run in the WRC group and were classified as such.

Thats why even though technically the Escort, IV, V and VI can run in FIA Group A (specifically Group A8 or equivalent) their full names have always included the WRC moniker which was only extended to cars who were allowed to run in the WRC group.

Between 1997 and 2000 the only group A car that really evolved into "true" WRC specs was the Impreza. The other manufcaturers at the time, like Toyota and Ford came out with new cars built to the new specs (Corolla WRC and Focus WRC respectively) instead of trying to "evolve" their Group A platforms.

In 2000, Mitsubishi was no longer allowed to run a glorified group A car in WRC and hence why they then started work on the ill-fated Lancer WRC. Caused no end of trouble for Mitsubishi teams world-wide because getting your hands on any of the ex-works Lancer WRC cars for a private team is ridiculously expensive and hard.

So most teams (if they stayed with Mitsubishi) end up having to basically build the VII/VIII/IXs to Group A specs and then go their own way against the ex-works WRC focuses and Imprezas (which are relatively easy to get).

Which is why I'd like to see the WRC group scrapped and lets go back to Group A and homologation. Non of these "one off" spefical version cars that are about 3 ft wider than the stock car. And whose fans can't even get a road version of the car that at least shares the same basic engine/drivetrain.

Last edited by codgi; Mar 16, 2008 at 05:48 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 12:28 PM
  #49  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by EVOlutionary
Could they have gotten that load, even on the stock turbo, by running the engine on an engine dyno and loading it up much more than it would see in a car??
Even with a pulled WG line you would only see those loads at peak boost but not at redline. Even on the Green with cams I am only at 260 by redline (8K. It does hold 300 or so fairly easily through the 5500-6500 range though.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 01:06 PM
  #50  
Lancerguy'03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Texas
green ftw.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 11:17 PM
  #51  
dbsears's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 2
From: Seattle, WA
Damn it would be nice to hold 300 load at 6500. I only hit 300 for about 1 sec...then it goes back down to 235 at redline I need a 3port...mbc just aint cutting it.

Last edited by dbsears; Mar 16, 2008 at 11:20 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 25, 2008 | 11:30 AM
  #52  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
bump for the coolest thread to ever grace evom
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2009 | 04:56 PM
  #53  
DaveK's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Bump...anybody ever use one of these on an Evo...street car or rally car, with restrictor or without? If so, have any results you can share?

Dave
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 07:58 PM
  #54  
kaansahbaz's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: san jose
garrett tr30R is the special turbo that the wrc cars use to have no lag. turbo by it self might cost arround 10grand
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 08:22 PM
  #55  
skiracer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Here's a guy who will do a ball bearing conversion to Mitsu turbos
http://www.owendevelopments.co.uk/pr...7&t=Mitsubishi

T30R turbo here:
http://www.owendevelopments.co.uk/pr...Id=21&subId=-1

Last edited by skiracer; Jun 10, 2009 at 08:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2009 | 08:30 PM
  #56  
DaveK's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by kaansahbaz
garrett tr30R is the special turbo that the wrc cars use to have no lag. turbo by it self might cost arround 10grand
I have one of these turbos on my hillclimb car and I can tell you that the turbo itself is not lag-free. Its the high $$ internals that will withstand very high EGTs that allows for agressive antilag.

I don't have antilag running on my setup yet, but the turbo does make good numbers. 400+ ft/lbs and 300+hp on a 34mm restrictor, and over 500 ft/lbs and 400hp when running with a 48mm inlet (same size as turbo inlet).

Dave
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #57  
Billy@EnglishRacing's Avatar
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
Originally Posted by DaveK
I have one of these turbos on my hillclimb car and I can tell you that the turbo itself is not lag-free. Its the high $$ internals that will withstand very high EGTs that allows for agressive antilag.

I don't have antilag running on my setup yet, but the turbo does make good numbers. 400+ ft/lbs and 300+hp on a 34mm restrictor, and over 500 ft/lbs and 400hp when running with a 48mm inlet (same size as turbo inlet).

Dave

Dave have you added Anti-Lag to your set up yet?
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2009 | 10:42 AM
  #58  
DaveK's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
Originally Posted by Billy@EnglishRacing
Dave have you added Anti-Lag to your set up yet?
Nope, there's a bug in the AEM software that's preventing us from running it right now (won't let us retard the timing enough). I'm leaving our HTA35R on there for our next hillclimb, as it makes more power and has a wider powerband. We'll see how I'm able to do with the increased lag vs the TR30R.

Dave
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2009 | 12:26 PM
  #59  
lancerevoclub's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: belgium
impressive developments they're still making. Wonder what the next big step will be.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2010 | 09:43 PM
  #60  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Bringing this thread back for some recent tech.

So I am assuming this is Dave's dynosheet-



This is the car we did (drag motor with a 34mm restrictor added for giggles)-



TR30R vs stock IX turbo. The question is what we are not seeing must be better response and the slightly reduced weight? I am going to add an engineered restrictor and use the same turbo on my car (so now a 2.4 MIVEC vs 2.4 VIII) with some of the other improvements I have wanted to try since this initial test.

Wanna talk about turbos some more?



Aaron
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:10 AM.