wrc evo turbo?
These are all "IMO" since I'm not an engineer.
I didn't have antilag capabilities on my car when it was tuned - wasn't sure if you guys were playing with that on your engine or not.
I was on a 10:1 2.3L stroker.
TR30r is lighter, though I'd bet any SS housing 28r-35r will also be lighter than the stock IX turbo.
The TR30r seems to hold a bit better up top, making an additional 25hp/ftlbs by 6000rpm, but comes up slower than the turbo you guys had. I'm assuming that this doens't matter much as normally teams would be running antilag to combat this issue.
I think the main benefit of the TR30r is that it has high zoot internals that will live under the extreme stress from antilag.
Dave
I didn't have antilag capabilities on my car when it was tuned - wasn't sure if you guys were playing with that on your engine or not.
I was on a 10:1 2.3L stroker.
TR30r is lighter, though I'd bet any SS housing 28r-35r will also be lighter than the stock IX turbo.
The TR30r seems to hold a bit better up top, making an additional 25hp/ftlbs by 6000rpm, but comes up slower than the turbo you guys had. I'm assuming that this doens't matter much as normally teams would be running antilag to combat this issue.
I think the main benefit of the TR30r is that it has high zoot internals that will live under the extreme stress from antilag.
Dave
These are all "IMO" since I'm not an engineer.
I didn't have antilag capabilities on my car when it was tuned - wasn't sure if you guys were playing with that on your engine or not.
I was on a 10:1 2.3L stroker.
TR30r is lighter, though I'd bet any SS housing 28r-35r will also be lighter than the stock IX turbo.
The TR30r seems to hold a bit better up top, making an additional 25hp/ftlbs by 6000rpm, but comes up slower than the turbo you guys had. I'm assuming that this doens't matter much as normally teams would be running antilag to combat this issue.
I think the main benefit of the TR30r is that it has high zoot internals that will live under the extreme stress from antilag.
Dave
I didn't have antilag capabilities on my car when it was tuned - wasn't sure if you guys were playing with that on your engine or not.
I was on a 10:1 2.3L stroker.
TR30r is lighter, though I'd bet any SS housing 28r-35r will also be lighter than the stock IX turbo.
The TR30r seems to hold a bit better up top, making an additional 25hp/ftlbs by 6000rpm, but comes up slower than the turbo you guys had. I'm assuming that this doens't matter much as normally teams would be running antilag to combat this issue.
I think the main benefit of the TR30r is that it has high zoot internals that will live under the extreme stress from antilag.
Dave
No idea what AEM is up to, but with the V2 coming out, I wasn't holding up any hope of them fixing the bug in the V1 ECU. I have two of them for sale and have a MoTeC on the Evo now.
Dave
Dave,
The dyno sheet from our car was definitely not holding boost out the top but the power drop was Midget error with the timing map. It makes better now, especially that I spiked it higher. I am not sure I am going to disclose that one yet though
I am going to repeat the test on my car to see what gains in response I can get with the MIVEC. We'll be using the stock ECU antilag with some tricks as well.
Aaron
The dyno sheet from our car was definitely not holding boost out the top but the power drop was Midget error with the timing map. It makes better now, especially that I spiked it higher. I am not sure I am going to disclose that one yet though
I am going to repeat the test on my car to see what gains in response I can get with the MIVEC. We'll be using the stock ECU antilag with some tricks as well.Aaron
So this T30R is capable of fairly high boost and airflow unrestricted? The reason this thread got started was we were trying to figure out what turbo Mitsu was most likely using to map out the VIII and IX timing maps. It would be something capable of holding 30psi fairly easy in low and mid range and still manage to hold 26 by redline (7k) if it didnt have a restrictor. More or less Green airflow vs a stock turbo.
it is not uncommon for manufacturers to map the engines without using the turbo at all, but rather a large electrically driven source of air at flow and pressure of their choice..
Dave,
The dyno sheet from our car was definitely not holding boost out the top but the power drop was Midget error with the timing map. It makes better now, especially that I spiked it higher. I am not sure I am going to disclose that one yet though
I am going to repeat the test on my car to see what gains in response I can get with the MIVEC. We'll be using the stock ECU antilag with some tricks as well.
Aaron
The dyno sheet from our car was definitely not holding boost out the top but the power drop was Midget error with the timing map. It makes better now, especially that I spiked it higher. I am not sure I am going to disclose that one yet though
I am going to repeat the test on my car to see what gains in response I can get with the MIVEC. We'll be using the stock ECU antilag with some tricks as well.Aaron

If you have any interest in the JDM antilag bits, I've got them sitting on a shelf. With the MoTeC the common way to do it is just using a throttle jacking solenoid.
Dave
PM price?
Thanks
Aaron
A little more on that later. I have the software figured out for USDM cars and have hardware ready to test but I just havent had time to take it out on the street and test it.
Thread Starter
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,458
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
I believe Aaron is working on it as a budget minded option. Also when you have helped make the stock ecu do everything that people said could not be done... why not figure out one more thing!
Long version- Autronic doesnt have knock control, ViPec does but in order to get knock control you buy two boards, MOTEC is spendy, AEM doesnt seem able to get it right. Like Billy said, it wasnt too long ago that the stock ECU "couldnt support more than 375whp" because it wasnt accurate. Then it was you'll never see a 8 second or low 9 second car run one. There are cars making 1053 and 905whp on the stock ECU, I personally make 794. I have stock drivability, speed density, map switching, anything I need, so why not add one more feature. I can do what true Rally antilag does anyway, -20*+ timing/fuel=BangBang.
I like challenges is also another acceptable answer. It will feel good to say we beat cars with a stock computer when this comes to fruition.
Yes it does now, but it's an add on board. It does individual cylinder knock monitoring.
there's details for it->
http://www.mrm-racing.se/index.php?pageid=knocke
there's details for it->
http://www.mrm-racing.se/index.php?pageid=knocke
just bumping the best thread on here lol
erm ive bought a tr30r and im not sure which car it was off any idears



also I cant find any v-band kits to buy for this turbo please help
erm ive bought a tr30r and im not sure which car it was off any idears



also I cant find any v-band kits to buy for this turbo please help
Last edited by _BILLY_ZR_; Oct 19, 2011 at 10:08 AM.







