Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

2013 STU Discussion!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 08:44 AM
  #46  
Construct's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 161
From: Utah
Originally Posted by RJones
I think that's about right. That translates to about 12.5k/16k
Originally Posted by vortico
Sounds right to me as well, thats what I've been running (well 12k/16k) which is more like 670/900.
Thanks for the data points.

Assuming quality dampers, how streetable is a setup with 12K/16K springs? We have smooth streets here and my NVH tolerance is relatively high (for now).
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 11:03 AM
  #47  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,969
Likes: 811
From: Portland, Or
Originally Posted by Construct
Thanks for the data points.

Assuming quality dampers, how streetable is a setup with 12K/16K springs? We have smooth streets here and my NVH tolerance is relatively high (for now).
Really depends on shocks and what bushings you have. My car with bilsteins and gtworx for the winter is barely tolerable anymore with solid/urethane bushings everywhere.

I don't believe in 700/900 anymore, but Ive tried it for almost a year and I wouldn't want to DD it on my AST 5100s.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 01:54 PM
  #48  
vortico's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 402
Likes: 1
From: El Paso, TX
Originally Posted by Construct
Thanks for the data points.

Assuming quality dampers, how streetable is a setup with 12K/16K springs? We have smooth streets here and my NVH tolerance is relatively high (for now).
On my bilstein PSS9/swift setup its not horrible, granted my daily drive is not very long. On 30-45 minute freeway drives it does not bother me either. On some crappy roads around here its pretty bad, but most of the roads here are fairly smooth. I currently still have mostly stock bushings in the suspension. The only bushings that have been changed are the diff mounts, mustache bar, and front motor mount if you want to take that one into consideration.

Overall I would say quite streetable if your tolerance is high and you don't have to drive super far each day with stock bushings.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 02:54 PM
  #49  
9!'clipseDOHC's Avatar
Evolving Member
FCOTM Winner
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 324
Likes: 4
From: El Paso, Texas
Subscribed for this year too.

Is it for sure that E85 usage will be terminated for STU next season?
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2013 | 04:12 PM
  #50  
qucifer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: CT
Originally Posted by 9!'clipseDOHC
Subscribed for this year too.

Is it for sure that E85 usage will be terminated for STU next season?
It looks likely that that will be the case, however we won't really know until after Nationals what's going to be recommended to the SEB by the STAC for the 2014 rules.

I'd write a letter now in favor of being able to use E85 in ST. http://www.sebscca.com

-Bryan
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 10:45 AM
  #51  
Dr.Chris's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Denver Chiropractor
I have yet to autocross, but just picked up a 2011 MR a couple of weeks ago. There is an autocross intro class coming up in nearby Atlanta that I'm going to attend. I could really see myself getting into this, so I am going to subscribe now to get some ideas. It seems STU is the class to be in, so I am subscribing.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 11:58 AM
  #52  
chono's Avatar
Evolving Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco, CA
Since we're talking about letters..
There's a request in the Feb fastrack to put the boxster in STR or STU.

#9146 Boxster(s) Classing Proposal
The SEB is seeking member comment regarding possible classing for the 1997-2004 Porsche Boxster (986 chassis, non-S) in the Street Touring Category. Input is specifically requested regarding potential interest in and/or suitability of these cars for either STU or STR. The SEB is also interested in member feedback regarding the possibility of preparation adjustments (for example, tire width limitations for mid-engine RWD cars), in order to address possible competition imbalances.
Write your letter here:
www.sebscca.com

-'chono'
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #53  
JDMS60R's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way WA
All this talk about spring rates has me wondering if I screwed the pooch so to speak.
Backstory I bought the Ohlins that were on Nick Meyers Evo that Andrew P drove and won STU nationals back in 2010. Originally the spring rates were 11k and 14k, on the suggestion of Geoff Clark stu nats winner in 2011 I replaced the rears with 12.5 or 700# springs.

Intially the car feels good with the softer spring, i.e. doesn't feel like its bouncing across the pavement and that its digging in so to speak. Typically on our lower traction sites I turn the dampers down to about 5 or 6 and leave the sway on full soft, its a 3 way Hotchkis.

I was looking at some pics from Nats and I see a alot of inside rear wheel lift, is this indicative of too soft a spring.? I only run on concrete at Lincoln so its hard to test and tune for this and the tiny little test track doesn't have the same elements. We did run the sway on full stiff and turned the dampers up a bit. Side note dunlop z1 on 17x9. LMk what you think
Thanks
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 06:41 PM
  #54  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
Originally Posted by JDMS60R
All this talk about spring rates has me wondering if I screwed the pooch so to speak.
Backstory I bought the Ohlins that were on Nick Meyers Evo that Andrew P drove and won STU nationals back in 2010. Originally the spring rates were 11k and 14k, on the suggestion of Geoff Clark stu nats winner in 2011 I replaced the rears with 12.5 or 700# springs.

Intially the car feels good with the softer spring, i.e. doesn't feel like its bouncing across the pavement and that its digging in so to speak. Typically on our lower traction sites I turn the dampers down to about 5 or 6 and leave the sway on full soft, its a 3 way Hotchkis.

I was looking at some pics from Nats and I see a alot of inside rear wheel lift, is this indicative of too soft a spring.? I only run on concrete at Lincoln so its hard to test and tune for this and the tiny little test track doesn't have the same elements. We did run the sway on full stiff and turned the dampers up a bit. Side note dunlop z1 on 17x9. LMk what you think
Thanks
i thought it meant too much rear bar.. but i know nothing
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 06:49 PM
  #55  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,969
Likes: 811
From: Portland, Or
Solution for inside rear lift, more front spring, more rear bar, less front bar.

Chris, did you see me lifting much of the inside rear? It should only come up a teensy tiny bit at max steady state (by design).
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2013 | 06:51 PM
  #56  
kyoo's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,834
Likes: 283
From: US
oop - i was totally wrong there lol
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 11:02 AM
  #57  
piknockout's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
In order:

1. 245/40/18 unmounted Dunlop ZII's
2. 245/40/18 Rivals on Enkei RPF1 18x9.5
3. 245/40/18 Dunlop Z1's on Enkei RPF1 18x9.5

While the Rival looks huge compared to the unmounted ZII's, when compared to the mounted Z1's on identical wheels, the Rivals and Z1's are essentially identical in height...at least for the 245/40/18's. What makes them seem bigger is that they appear to have more curb protection near the rim.

Hoping to do some testing next weekend...and the weekend after that, and the weekend after that, and the...well you get the idea.

Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 11:29 AM
  #58  
Bassicfun's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 756
Likes: 1
From: Mid Ohio
"like"

looking forward to some unbiased reviews, though the zII will get better with time like the z1 did. Thanks!!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 02:10 PM
  #59  
JDMS60R's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way WA
Originally Posted by Dallas J
Solution for inside rear lift, more front spring, more rear bar, less front bar.

Chris, did you see me lifting much of the inside rear? It should only come up a teensy tiny bit at max steady state (by design).
Unfortunately I didn't get to see much of your runs, my problem is directly related to the level of grip or at least it seems to be. At Portland events or locally shouldn't be a problem for my setup, just brainstorming and trying to get some advice.

I think I will turn up the front dampers first, and see what that does. If that doesn't get it done I will try your advice and go with a heavier spring up front

Thanks
Chris
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2013 | 07:47 PM
  #60  
Butt Dyno's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 154
From: Why do they always call the Evo the Dark Side?
Originally Posted by Construct
Thanks for the data points.

Assuming quality dampers, how streetable is a setup with 12K/16K springs? We have smooth streets here and my NVH tolerance is relatively high (for now).
I'm on 600/800 (11k/15k roughly) and it's pretty okay on the highway, obviously less so on bad roads. If my commute wasn't 85 miles a day, and if I wasn't trying to keep mileage off the car, and if the car wasn't deafening inside, and if it had heated seats... THEN I'd consider DDing it That said, when my old E36 was in the shop I'd drive it to work no problem. Now that I have bluetooth I can even hear people when they call me.

Originally Posted by chono
Since we're talking about letters..
There's a request in the Feb fastrack to put the boxster in STR or STU.
Wow, that's not a great idea for STR (new class, popular, diverse) but even worse for STU. Talk about course dependency. I wonder how much tire you can get on one of those things in ST trim?

Originally Posted by JDMS60R
I was looking at some pics from Nats and I see a alot of inside rear wheel lift, is this indicative of too soft a spring.? I only run on concrete at Lincoln so its hard to test and tune for this and the tiny little test track doesn't have the same elements. We did run the sway on full stiff and turned the dampers up a bit. Side note dunlop z1 on 17x9. LMk what you think
Thanks
FWIW, here's me at the Finale (after recovering from brake line failures, grr) on 600/800, WORKS rear bar on the middle setting, Z1s on 17x9.5s. I don't think I have quite as much lift as you but the inside rear is still pretty much off the ground.

Like you, I don't really have any concrete locally (hoping ACU-4 comes back), and even Toledo isn't really the same as Lincoln. I'm hoping Rick builds those front swaybar brackets.

Originally Posted by Dallas J
Solution for inside rear lift, more front spring, more rear bar, less front bar.
I get the more front spring, but wouldn't more front bar help keep the car flatter pretty much in the same way that more front spring would?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:57 PM.