2017 SCCA Solo ASP Discussion
#16
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
And it didn't rub anywhere else? Not the shocks or the body? Any spacers needed?
The same buddy from the pics mentioned he had to run a spacer in the front.... which I'm sure is set-up dependent.
This topic is particularly concerning to me as I'm about 2 seconds from pulling the trigger on a set of wheels and now not sure which offset to get. I was originally thinking to go with a +22 with a 295 A7 but now I'm wondering if that offset would work if I decided to go with a 315 A7. I suppose I could always use a spacer on the +22 but the +22 wheel I am looking at is twice the price of the +15.
The same buddy from the pics mentioned he had to run a spacer in the front.... which I'm sure is set-up dependent.
This topic is particularly concerning to me as I'm about 2 seconds from pulling the trigger on a set of wheels and now not sure which offset to get. I was originally thinking to go with a +22 with a 295 A7 but now I'm wondering if that offset would work if I decided to go with a 315 A7. I suppose I could always use a spacer on the +22 but the +22 wheel I am looking at is twice the price of the +15.
#20
IIRC their car was in the low 2900 range 5-6 years ago. I'd imagine he'd have figured out how to pull some weight out since then. Sub 2800 should be doable in SM with some ingenuity and money (my plan gets me to ~2820), so I'd think 100 or so lbs heavier in SP isn't out of the realm of possibility.
There wasn't any rubbing that I can recall with the +15. I think it had 10mm spacers up front, but that was just to widen the track width a little, not necessary for fitment. Don't mind the SM classing, it was a BSP legal car that I was just running in SM for points while mine was down.
There wasn't any rubbing that I can recall with the +15. I think it had 10mm spacers up front, but that was just to widen the track width a little, not necessary for fitment. Don't mind the SM classing, it was a BSP legal car that I was just running in SM for points while mine was down.
#22
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
I've seen one ASP evo that was 2880 but that was with a 1lb lithium battery, single plate clutch and running on fumes. Takes too much effort to maintain a car like that though and takes the fun out of it.
#23
2950 depending on fuel load. I refuse to spend money to take weight off of the rear end.
I've seen one ASP evo that was 2880 but that was with a 1lb lithium battery, single plate clutch and running on fumes. Takes too much effort to maintain a car like that though and takes the fun out of it.
I've seen one ASP evo that was 2880 but that was with a 1lb lithium battery, single plate clutch and running on fumes. Takes too much effort to maintain a car like that though and takes the fun out of it.
#24
There wasn't any rubbing that I can recall with the +15. I think it had 10mm spacers up front, but that was just to widen the track width a little, not necessary for fitment. Don't mind the SM classing, it was a BSP legal car that I was just running in SM for points while mine was down.
#28
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
#30
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
I had the Wavetrac front diff and just recently swapped it out for Mfactory set to 1way and 60% lockup (set with plate stack). Wavetrac is 1.5way so causes some binding with heavy engine braking and high steering angle. Which exactly when you are trying to lift and get the front to tuck in. I fought the lift turn-in for a few years before being enlightened to the likely cause.
Wavetrac is fine though, basically works like stock but much stronger. Great on track where steering angles and engine braking are much less.
Wavetrac is fine though, basically works like stock but much stronger. Great on track where steering angles and engine braking are much less.