View Poll Results: Should MP5 be banned?
Yes



47
41.59%
No



49
43.36%
Who is MP5??? No opinion.



17
15.04%
Voters: 113. You may not vote on this poll
Whether you Love 'em or Hate 'em Should Mp5 be banned?
You know what folks, car forums have lots of different kinds of characters. Some characters add value through technical postings and insights, some characters add value through personality. MP5 is one of EvoM's bullsh*t meters.
His technical contribution may get obscured by the fact that it often comes in the form of stirring it up with vendors and vendor-fans, but MP5 actually knows his stuff and if he's putting someone on the defensive there's probably a decent reason. I have no idea what earned him his most recent time-out but if history is any indicator, I am guessing that it involved calling a vendor out on what he suspected was some kind of handwaving or BS, and it was probably justified.
MP5 reads between the lines and he questions the handwaving that some vendors like to do and demands that they get down to the details. This is a pain in many vendor's *** because many vendors feel they are above having to explain themselves and that their reputations should precede them. This is a pain in many moderator's *** because they know he puts people on the defensive. But it doesn't mean the questions he asks, shouldn't be asked.
The forums have been pretty peaceful lately but if that peace comes at the cost of valid technical criticism of vendors and products then what good is it?
His technical contribution may get obscured by the fact that it often comes in the form of stirring it up with vendors and vendor-fans, but MP5 actually knows his stuff and if he's putting someone on the defensive there's probably a decent reason. I have no idea what earned him his most recent time-out but if history is any indicator, I am guessing that it involved calling a vendor out on what he suspected was some kind of handwaving or BS, and it was probably justified.
MP5 reads between the lines and he questions the handwaving that some vendors like to do and demands that they get down to the details. This is a pain in many vendor's *** because many vendors feel they are above having to explain themselves and that their reputations should precede them. This is a pain in many moderator's *** because they know he puts people on the defensive. But it doesn't mean the questions he asks, shouldn't be asked.
The forums have been pretty peaceful lately but if that peace comes at the cost of valid technical criticism of vendors and products then what good is it?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Originally posted by blonde
dude, this is exactly what i was talking about. you have no clue what you are talking about and you assume that you have it all figured out. after he questioned me on the closed loop i simply posted the text from turboxs about the closed loop boost. this had NOTHING to do with anything. do you really think that i would ban him or even talk to him about it? i am here to learn and if i am wrong than i thank the person for helping me out. i didn't ban MP5 but the reason he was banned was for a totally useless post that was uncalled for and he was warned by secret chimp and rightfully so. if you think that i banned him because he corrected me about UTEC boost control (even though i was right) than you are clueless and you might want to take a step back and think long and hard about how much you really know about the issue.
dude, this is exactly what i was talking about. you have no clue what you are talking about and you assume that you have it all figured out. after he questioned me on the closed loop i simply posted the text from turboxs about the closed loop boost. this had NOTHING to do with anything. do you really think that i would ban him or even talk to him about it? i am here to learn and if i am wrong than i thank the person for helping me out. i didn't ban MP5 but the reason he was banned was for a totally useless post that was uncalled for and he was warned by secret chimp and rightfully so. if you think that i banned him because he corrected me about UTEC boost control (even though i was right) than you are clueless and you might want to take a step back and think long and hard about how much you really know about the issue.
Originally posted by ez76
You know what folks, car forums have lots of different kinds of characters. Some characters add value through technical postings and insights, some characters add value through personality. MP5 is one of EvoM's bullsh*t meters.
His technical contribution may get obscured by the fact that it often comes in the form of stirring it up with vendors and vendor-fans, but MP5 actually knows his stuff and if he's putting someone on the defensive there's probably a decent reason. I have no idea what earned him his most recent time-out but if history is any indicator, I am guessing that it involved calling a vendor out on what he suspected was some kind of handwaving or BS, and it was probably justified.
MP5 reads between the lines and he questions the handwaving that some vendors like to do and demands that they get down to the details. This is a pain in many vendor's *** because many vendors feel they are above having to explain themselves and that their reputations should precede them. This is a pain in many moderator's *** because they know he puts people on the defensive. But it doesn't mean the questions he asks, shouldn't be asked.
The forums have been pretty peaceful lately but if that peace comes at the cost of valid technical criticism of vendors and products then what good is it?
You know what folks, car forums have lots of different kinds of characters. Some characters add value through technical postings and insights, some characters add value through personality. MP5 is one of EvoM's bullsh*t meters.
His technical contribution may get obscured by the fact that it often comes in the form of stirring it up with vendors and vendor-fans, but MP5 actually knows his stuff and if he's putting someone on the defensive there's probably a decent reason. I have no idea what earned him his most recent time-out but if history is any indicator, I am guessing that it involved calling a vendor out on what he suspected was some kind of handwaving or BS, and it was probably justified.
MP5 reads between the lines and he questions the handwaving that some vendors like to do and demands that they get down to the details. This is a pain in many vendor's *** because many vendors feel they are above having to explain themselves and that their reputations should precede them. This is a pain in many moderator's *** because they know he puts people on the defensive. But it doesn't mean the questions he asks, shouldn't be asked.
The forums have been pretty peaceful lately but if that peace comes at the cost of valid technical criticism of vendors and products then what good is it?
Originally posted by Smogrunner
I don't claim to know much. But his last post before being timed out was the one I quoted about you and the UTEC. I know this much: The Forum has not been a flamefest lately and a little spice never hurt anything. I am an Evolved member which should count for something beside being insulted by you. I would truly hate to go elsewhere for my daily evo internet fix, but if I am no longer welcome here.... I'll go.
I don't claim to know much. But his last post before being timed out was the one I quoted about you and the UTEC. I know this much: The Forum has not been a flamefest lately and a little spice never hurt anything. I am an Evolved member which should count for something beside being insulted by you. I would truly hate to go elsewhere for my daily evo internet fix, but if I am no longer welcome here.... I'll go.
you are more than welcome here but i am just trying to show you guys that you do not know everything. and yes, the place had enought drama in the past few days and if you didn't notice that than that is because the mods are doing a good job. we are here all the times and we delete flaming posts as soon as they happen.
This place will get boring fast at the rate members get banned. Heck bring Al back into general population and I don't even like the guy. IMO, repeated Timeout's and Thread banning should suffice as opposed to permanently banned.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,558
Likes: 1
From: Inland Empire, CA
Originally posted by blonde
IIRC you were the one that accused me of being Al.....
IIRC you were the one that accused me of being Al.....
However, it was MP5 that PM'd me saying that you were one of the cool ole boys and that I was wrong. I think I have his exact words around here somewhere.
Originally posted by blonde
my question to you is this: can you have a debate and prove that somebody is wrong with out flames?
my question to you is this: can you have a debate and prove that somebody is wrong with out flames?
Originally posted by ez76
There is a fine line between posting flamebait and posting facts and questions that people don't want to hear because they are uncomfortable with them.
There is a fine line between posting flamebait and posting facts and questions that people don't want to hear because they are uncomfortable with them.
also, not sure if you are aware of it but the enitre issue started in a thread where Al gave props to unortodox racing for his roll cage. now please tell me how can that issue be baised and flame worty...
What I am hearing from you is that MP5 should be restricted from posting in vendor forums. That sounds like a good compromise.
I insist that EvoM suffers a loss if MP5 is permanently banned.
I insist that EvoM suffers a loss if MP5 is permanently banned.
Being in TO is one thing, but banning him would just blow. The guy is organizing a dyno day this coming weekend, for crying out loud! Hopefully his PMs are active. At least let him be active in the Vishnu Forum, please, so he can facilitate this massive dyno day effort.
Put him in TO for the Dynoflash forum or whatever else is needed if he won't respect your wishes (as I agree he should abide), but blocking him out of Vishnu this close to the dyno day is way over the top.
There was a lot of BS and drama here in the past, but I think EvoM is a little triggerhappy on TOs right now.
Put him in TO for the Dynoflash forum or whatever else is needed if he won't respect your wishes (as I agree he should abide), but blocking him out of Vishnu this close to the dyno day is way over the top.
There was a lot of BS and drama here in the past, but I think EvoM is a little triggerhappy on TOs right now.
Originally posted by ez76
What I am hearing from you is that MP5 should be restricted from posting in vendor forums. That sounds like a good compromise.
What I am hearing from you is that MP5 should be restricted from posting in vendor forums. That sounds like a good compromise.
Why do you guys think there is a mod conspiracy happening here? I don't know any of the details involved, but I think these guys have been doing a great job managing the site. To go off on Blonde in particular is bad form, cause I've never seen him been anything but cool and respectful to the members here. They earned a bunch of respect from me with how they finally decided to handle the Al vs Vis situation. If they could get through that as diplomatically as it seems like they finally did, I don't think its cool to accuse them of randomly banning folks for no good reason. Especially someone like MP5 whose obviously earned his cred around here. We don't know the details, but anyones who's been around here long enough knows that MP5 gets off on stirring things up. Thats cool. His perogative.
IMO, its bad form on our part to get uppity on the mods for this, whether we like the situation or not. Who knows. These guys have shown themselves to be pretty forgiving in the end, I'm sure things will eventually work out. But for now, experienced member or not, you let someone continually break your simple rules, your just asking for more trouble.
My unwanted 2 cents.
IMO, its bad form on our part to get uppity on the mods for this, whether we like the situation or not. Who knows. These guys have shown themselves to be pretty forgiving in the end, I'm sure things will eventually work out. But for now, experienced member or not, you let someone continually break your simple rules, your just asking for more trouble.
My unwanted 2 cents.
Originally posted by Noize
Being in TO is one thing, but banning him would just blow. The guy is organizing a dyno day this coming weekend, for crying out loud! Hopefully his PMs are active. At least let him be active in the Vishnu Forum, please, so he can facilitate this massive dyno day effort.
Put him in TO for the Dynoflash forum or whatever else is needed if he won't respect your wishes (as I agree he should abide), but blocking him out of Vishnu this close to the dyno day is way over the top.
There was a lot of BS and drama here in the past, but I think EvoM is a little triggerhappy on TOs right now.
Being in TO is one thing, but banning him would just blow. The guy is organizing a dyno day this coming weekend, for crying out loud! Hopefully his PMs are active. At least let him be active in the Vishnu Forum, please, so he can facilitate this massive dyno day effort.
Put him in TO for the Dynoflash forum or whatever else is needed if he won't respect your wishes (as I agree he should abide), but blocking him out of Vishnu this close to the dyno day is way over the top.
There was a lot of BS and drama here in the past, but I think EvoM is a little triggerhappy on TOs right now.
Last edited by blonde; Mar 10, 2004 at 10:39 PM.






