ROAD/RACE- Timing Control Box OFFICAL RELEASE
Feb 13, 2009, 08:17 AM
#32
Feb 13, 2009, 11:44 AM
#35
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: California
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
91 is the highest here. i dont know how they would tune for 93.
just use 93, it has a higher knock resistance than 91 so think of it as a safe guard for your engine
just use 93, it has a higher knock resistance than 91 so think of it as a safe guard for your engine
Feb 13, 2009, 12:20 PM
#36
Evolved Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Salty, UT
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Feb 13, 2009, 12:25 PM
#37
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Canadia
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
that cant be the 2.0 its gotta be the 2.4 on the sheet, a stock 2.0 i have seen dyno'd at 125 to the wheels,what ever it was dynod on in the charts,either way it still is showing the hp increase,and for the price to get what you get seems pretty good
Feb 13, 2009, 12:53 PM
#38
yes I can see it is still showing an HP increase but what good are these numbers when its saying stock to the wheels 161hp. yes i understand that the fact that the dynos base vs dyno with mod is the most important piece of information but can we trust these dyno numbers when the stock to the wheel # is way off. ?
im just asking the question for clarification im not saying anything bad about RRM I love their stuff my friends have I just think that the error on the charts should be clarified for everyones benefit.
but yes either way the gains do seem good and for the price its all good!
hopefully well get some clarification in the future if not then oh well i bet it works great as the other reviews have shown.
Feb 13, 2009, 01:09 PM
#39
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im skeptical cuz the dyno seems too high for a stock lancer... i dont think we put that much to the wheels stock so imagine the 9 WHP gained would be alot smaller if it used another dyno that doesnt make the # look so high... it would be maybe 2whp? or 3 at MOST because people dynoed their lancer stock and it showed around 120 something...
Feb 13, 2009, 06:30 PM
#40
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
That is legit dyno. As for octane, we tune to 89-91 octane. Even with the tune you can run around with 87 if you have to but to get full advantage of the timing box, you would want to run 91 or better.
ROAD/RACE
ROAD/RACE
Feb 13, 2009, 07:27 PM
#41
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: BC, Canada
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rock, this may be a dumb question, u said it is tuned to 89-91. So will u still get the 8 hp with 89 octane or will it be slightly less, like 5 or 6 hp. I would assume if u did use the regular gas u might see 2 or 3 hp if any. Thanks
Feb 14, 2009, 12:21 PM
#43
Account Disabled
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
im skeptical cuz the dyno seems too high for a stock lancer... i dont think we put that much to the wheels stock so imagine the 9 WHP gained would be alot smaller if it used another dyno that doesnt make the # look so high... it would be maybe 2whp? or 3 at MOST because people dynoed their lancer stock and it showed around 120 something...
Feb 15, 2009, 09:46 PM
#44
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
ROAD/RACE
Feb 15, 2009, 10:22 PM
#45
Evolved Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Salty, UT
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
