Why toxicfab? I read some of the thread and he ignored the question of his manifold vs a ported stocker comparison about 20 times in the few pages I read. While answering every other question. According to FID's test they gained almost the same HP OVER a ported that toxic did over a plain stocker.

I could be wrong but the toxic doesn't seem like the best option out there in terms of numbers.

 

With how my car feels right now with the BBK Full, 25psi & ridiculously rich, once its tuned @ 27psi & 11.5 or so a/f, I am pretty confident Ill be right around 420whp & 400wtq on Chad's dyno...Once I receive my ToxicFab Manifold Ill be heading back to Chad's to test it out...

 

Mona Lisa or the JM Fab that CBRD recommends are good choices

 

when are you heading to the dyno with the toxic fab manifold, and if so are you doing any sort of back to back testing??

 

Okay as far as the question goes, not only do I advertise and post pictures by my self I'm also fabricating by my self 6 days a week so im sorry I missed a question. I also mentioned that it was agenst a stocker not a ported because no one we knew had a evo with a ported manifold. I'm not out here saying its the best as others do im here giving other options to the evo community.
Thanks

 

I will be heading to the dyno first to touch up my tune and make it more driveable till I get the manifold...then the car will be tuned to as best as we can get it with a ported stocker then it will be removed and the ToxicFab manifold will be put on all within an hour or so then testing will begin...Boost levels will remain the same from the ported stocker to ToxicFab's manifold to keep the test as fair as possible...

 

A very sexy looking manifold. But damn tubular manis are expensive! Looking forward to your results.

 

Same question here. Curious to see some independent dyno #s on this manifold vs a good ported stock manifold.

MrC

 

I don't recommend this kinda of practice. I'm def not a fan when I see vendors do it. Let your numbers, testing, and quality speak for themselves. Let people figure it out themselves. Make your posts attractive with GOOD photos, GOOD information, and give GOOD customer service, and you'll be fine.

-Jalal

 

Don't worry...you will see my results vs. a MAP ported stocker in 2.5 weeks or so...at least 2 other members on here testing it as well...each test will be done with a different turbo...

 

You have said it before, the tests will be done soon enough.
Thanks

 

My apologies to CBRD for jumping into this vendor thread. Let's get back on the topic of the BBK turbos.

MrC

 

I am in no way saying you are false advertising anything. More-so I feel people are jumping on the bandwagon and thats not to insult your product. Many ported stockers have gained 20hp over a non-ported stocker. Especially from MAP or Mil.Spec, that being said, your numbers to me personally, don't seem particularly special.

 

Well that's your own opinion
Thanks

 

no worries guys,

sorry as I'm out of the office this week, until this coming weekend, so if I'm slow to respond I apologize.

I dont mind manifold talk, since we do our own stuff...

Cheers

cb