Notices

CBRD- BBK info- NEW turbos, etc...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 06:19 PM
  #526  
EvolutinIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho NM
Originally Posted by mrfred
FiD, ToxicFab (although not clear that he is going to market it), and Fortune Auto all look nice. The first two are equal length while the Fortune Auto is not. All have documented significant gains. The FiD has an awesome collector setup with the tubing aiming into the turbo at as optimum angle as possible.
Are you considering the mona lisa as well? Either way, why or why not?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 06:28 PM
  #527  
mrfred's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by EvolutinIX
Are you considering the mona lisa as well? Either way, why or why not?
I never found any dyno results on the Mona Lisa. If anyone knows of any, please PM me so as not to clutter this thread too much.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #528  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by mrfred
FiD, ToxicFab (although not clear that he is going to market it), and Fortune Auto all look nice. The first two are equal length while the Fortune Auto is not. All have documented significant gains. The FiD has an awesome collector setup with the tubing aiming into the turbo at as optimum angle as possible.
Exact same 2 manifolds I have been looking at...I'm going to throw the BBK on my stock ported manifold then go from there...
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2010 | 10:24 PM
  #529  
FiD-Turbo.com's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Manassas, VA
Originally Posted by 06MREvo
Exact same 2 manifolds I have been looking at...I'm going to throw the BBK on my stock ported manifold then go from there...
Sorry for getting off topic but if you're seriously considering the FiD Stock Manifold, i highly recommend you take advantage of our pre-order pricing. After the first week of Sept. when the first batch of production manifold is completed, the regular price will go into effect, which is significantly more. Of the all manifolds mentioned above, ours is the only independently dyno- proven manifold that is 100% stainless steel with cnc machined head and turbine flange, an optimized narrow-angle merge collector, lifetime warranty to the original purchaser and backed by a company that's been in the automotive performance since 1999. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to pm or call us.

We're looking forward to seeing some dyno #s shortly with the FiD Manifold and BBK as well as the FiD+FP Black. We've already seen significant gains on the FiD+FP Red.

MrC
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 09:47 AM
  #530  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by vmrevo9
CBRD FTW! i am actually thinking of letting this turbo hit the streets first and seeing what people are managing with it on pump. i might just order the Full and upgrade later. athough i really didnt want to do that. but if the car can be balanced now with the full and on 93 than when its time i can get the motor and head built and the full can get upgraded to the B and e85 will hopefully be the fuel of choice!

plus i have always wanted the Full so might as well experience the Full first and you cant beat a reliable and strong stock frame turbo!
I am actually wondering if the FP 73HTA Green is the way to go for me. Bigger than the Full, smaller than the B. 51lb/min > 54lb/min > 59lb/min. Although I love CBRD's service and they are only about an hour east of me right on Rt 30. I live right off of 30. It is like literally having one road from my house to their shop. Like the yellow brick road leading me to the Emerald City. I am so confused! I think we all need lots and lots of dyno comparisons and data.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #531  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL


+1 on the data and comparasions. thats why i will just go with the Full. i am sure that i will love the Full and from the data that is out it should be a really good choice for me. later on i will probably upgrade to the B but i think i will have a blast with the Full

i am really interested in seeing spool difference and response. we know that the power will be more with the B i also would like to see the reliablity of this turbo in the long run as well.

a fun street car with really good power and great response and spool is all i'm looking for right now. when i get more serious than the B might be employed!

Last edited by vmrevo9; Aug 26, 2010 at 10:27 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:44 AM
  #532  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Guys, jump in, get a turbo, test it, post the results. It's really that simple. Everyone expects good/hard data to be just spoon fed to them and at some point you gotta realize that you gotta just jump in and add your own data to the pool Honestly, all of these are good choices, but I still vote for BBK Full: fits your current intake, stock oil lines, OEM WGA, less overall cost, less stuff to deal with, all of the fun
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 10:55 AM
  #533  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
i understand on just jump in and see but if the turbo is not to my liking than i dont want to have the hassle of trying to unload it to get the turbo i want lol. i like the fast spool if i can keep that and add some more power than i'll try the Full first. plus after thinking (been deployed for 120+days so i have plenty of time for that) i hardly ever run the car to the upper rpm range unless its a quick spirited run or an occasional drag strip nite. the car is used mostly on the street from stop light to stop light. quick bursts of speed. i think for me right now my choice are the Full and the Green. both great choices both good turbos but the Full had me hooked since day 1.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #534  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Yeah I think I am going to stick with the B if I have to just jump in. With my set up I would probably make 380whp max with a Full and I am looking for more than that for the money. Again, drove a Full car and while awesome, I want a bit more. And until very recently I was one of those guys always looking for the SMALLER and more responsive turbo. But the Full is so good on response I can sacrifice a bit to go with the B.

One good point you bring up is the intake. Seen the Green requires a 80mm intake w/ the 84mm surge port housing. This is not the case with the B, correct? Was planning to run a Perrin tube to the stock MAF which is currently connnected to my APS cold air. So you can run a stock intake tube if you choose the B, right? And what type of anti-surge housing is on the B again?

Last edited by TURBevO8; Aug 26, 2010 at 11:21 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 12:06 PM
  #535  
06MREvo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (90)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Correct...BBK-B still uses stock compressor housing so no special intake needed...I am a fan of the silicone intakes though...I wish someone made one that worked with the stock compressor housing and didn't have a bov recirc tube on it...I'm Just going to go with a JMF non recirc intake then...

The new FP green hasn't even crossed my mind since I sold my FP black...I'm gonna go with the BBK-B full for now then upgrade to the BBK-B later this winter...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #536  
Mike01gsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
From: PA
Well guys I've been reading and reading and I really wanted to go with Chad and they BBK-B but I decided to go with the HTA Green. I have a full bolt on car including ported everything Exhaust manifold, intake, 65mm tbody, 02 housing, cbrd intercooler, cams and it will be on 93. Shooting for around 400whp but we shall see.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 12:46 PM
  #537  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
Originally Posted by Mike01gsr
Well guys I've been reading and reading and I really wanted to go with Chad and they BBK-B but I decided to go with the HTA Green. I have a full bolt on car including ported everything Exhaust manifold, intake, 65mm tbody, 02 housing, cbrd intercooler, cams and it will be on 93. Shooting for around 400whp but we shall see.
Post up results. Would be nice to see what it will do with those mods. And I like to see what PA EVOs are up to as well.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2010 | 09:02 PM
  #538  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
Yeah I think I am going to stick with the B if I have to just jump in. With my set up I would probably make 380whp max with a Full and I am looking for more than that for the money. Again, drove a Full car and while awesome, I want a bit more. And until very recently I was one of those guys always looking for the SMALLER and more responsive turbo. But the Full is so good on response I can sacrifice a bit to go with the B.

One good point you bring up is the intake. Seen the Green requires a 80mm intake w/ the 84mm surge port housing. This is not the case with the B, correct? Was planning to run a Perrin tube to the stock MAF which is currently connnected to my APS cold air. So you can run a stock intake tube if you choose the B, right? And what type of anti-surge housing is on the B again?
you make a good point. it makes sense to get more power for your money. i know a BBK Full can break 400hp on a dynojet and it with the right parts make that on a mustang dyno. it should fit the bill for me until the motor gets rebuilt and then it will be time for something bigger
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 04:59 AM
  #539  
TURBevO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,247
Likes: 0
From: PA
^That may not be a bad idea. I could warrant paying for another tune if I went from Full to B and added a stage 3 head and drop-ins, more aggresive cams and valvetrain. The B on 30psi on 93 would be sick. This is snowballing already...haha....I never planned to do drop-ins and head work...
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2010 | 06:26 AM
  #540  
vmrevo9's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Air Force
15 Year Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,544
Likes: 16
From: Huntsville, AL
Originally Posted by TURBevO8
^That may not be a bad idea. I could warrant paying for another tune if I went from Full to B and added a stage 3 head and drop-ins, more aggresive cams and valvetrain. The B on 30psi on 93 would be sick. This is snowballing already...haha....I never planned to do drop-ins and head work...
glad i could help
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.