Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #1  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1

Shiv upon reviewing the stage 1 (w/o cat) and Ez's Stage 1+ both cars were tuned on 100 octane but I didnt see a whole lota power given by the cams throughout the curve Whats the score is the cat that restrictive? If so find us a 0420 fix ASAP!!

What you you figure the stage 1+ will make on 93 octane on a DD?

What about the stage 1+ on 100 octane on the DD? If it doesnt differ from Ez's then the cat blows bad and we need a cel fix
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 09:37 PM
  #2  
Ryanmcd3's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw Ga
Re: Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1

Get Ken working on that 420 fix



Originally posted by MP5
Shiv upon reviewing the stage 1 (w/o cat) and Ez's Stage 1+ both cars were tuned on 100 octane but I didnt see a whole lota power given by the cams throughout the curve Whats the score is the cat that restrictive? If so find us a 0420 fix ASAP!!

What you you figure the stage 1+ will make on 93 octane on a DD?

What about the stage 1+ on 100 octane on the DD? If it doesnt differ from Ez's then the cat blows bad and we need a cel fix
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:27 PM
  #3  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
For some perspective, here is a before (stage 1) and after (stage 1+).
Attached Thumbnails Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1-stage1_91_100_hp_trq_resize.jpg  
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:28 PM
  #4  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Stage 1+
Attached Thumbnails Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1-stage1-_91_100_hp_trq_multi_resize.jpg  
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:36 PM
  #5  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
different axes aside, you can see the 24ft.lb. mid-range improvements (which are no doubt partly due to the XEDEFlash and increased boost there) and on the high-end the car keeps at least 240ft.lb. of torque until 6400rpm compared to 5000rpm with stage 1.
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:37 PM
  #6  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Yes I looked at that too but the current stage 1 w/ cat delete was
Attached Thumbnails Differences between EZ's and the current catless stage 1-bonniehp001.jpg  
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:39 PM
  #7  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ez76
different axes aside, you can see the 24ft.lb. mid-range improvements (which are no doubt partly due to the XEDEFlash and increased boost there) and on the high-end the car keeps at least 240ft.lb. of torque until 6400rpm compared to 5000rpm with stage 1.
Your right your TQ is noticably better And Im drunk so that said the HP is still too close for me to think the cat is causing some clog
Old Jan 13, 2004 | 10:43 PM
  #8  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
definitely see what you're saying and it would definitely seem like the cat (even the high-flow one i am running) is restrictive!

assuming minimal car variance on 100oct, good for almost 8-14ft.lb. from 3600-6400rpm! next time i'm in the shop i'll submit for a test pipe run to see what the 1+ does on 100oct and no cat
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 07:15 AM
  #9  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
which model ex system are you running? On the vishnu site, the cats look different beween the std & sig ex systems? Is that true? Do you know for certain what brand/model cat you are running?
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #10  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
I am running the signature series exhaust. Shiv, are there substantial differences between the cats?
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 11:31 AM
  #11  
Aby@MIL.SPEC's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (161)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,043
Likes: 13
From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.
I believe the sig series runs the car sound cat. It looks like the 94109 model, however I dont know for sure. did you do a compare between cat vs test pipe on 91 octane?
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 11:38 AM
  #12  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally posted by WOT
which model ex system are you running? On the vishnu site, the cats look different beween the std & sig ex systems? Is that true? Do you know for certain what brand/model cat you are running?
Nope But no cat, as flow goes, is far better than even the most free-est flowing 3" cat. Still, running cat-less is just asking for trouble in most states. It will also give you a headache during stop and go traffic. My suggestion is to keep the cats and just install cams to make up for the power loss Or install the optional test pipe when you go to the track to have some fun.

Cheers,
shiv
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 01:37 PM
  #13  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Or install the optional test pipe when you go to the track to have some fun.

Shiv,

I assume we can install a switch to go cat-less, in addition to race gas, for track fun?
Old Jan 14, 2004 | 01:53 PM
  #14  
ez76's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,332
Likes: 0
From: bay area
is a switched set-up still illegal for road use? (since "at any time" you could be running catless)?
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Corey Ottinger
Cobb AccessPORT
6
Feb 7, 2016 06:24 PM
ez
South Region
29
Jan 22, 2006 06:28 PM
Tofurky
Drag Racing
3
May 22, 2004 12:43 PM
ez4me2c3d
Lancer Troubleshooting
12
Aug 20, 2002 12:24 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:59 PM.