Notices
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide

Buschur/Dynoflash/SMC alky kit problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 05:51 AM
  #121  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
yes of course.

Originally Posted by Richard L
It seems that many of your are interested in the w/a injection application but has anyone consider the implications when the system fails to deliver - there is no discussion of a "plan B" ?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=43

How much meth would I have to add to a tank full to get the octane up to say, 108? Do I need to run 108 all the time?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #122  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I use the alcohol as there is no reason NOT to run it - it helps to prevent knock and it cools in intake charge on a car with super high boost on a small turbo generating lots of hot air . . .
I use it because I've witnessed a tremendous improvement in power, and I haven't yet even upped the boost pressure yet. If my results can be duplicated with water, I haven't seen it . . . anywhere.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 06:52 AM
  #123  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Wow, so Rich, did you figure out your alky kit problems? haha 8 pages of pretty good discussion.

Bottom of page 8, Richard, EXACTLY!

Why is it that nobody else on here picked up on the failure that could happen with an alky kit? While the chances of a failure are very low with the SMC/Buschur kit the chance does exist as the chance of failure always exists with anything.

From what I am reading it is suggested that in order to create power with water injection the AFR's on pump gas have to be run in the 12.-:1 range. This is what is being suggested. Personally I wouldn't consider tuning a pump gas combination in the 12:1 AFR range. This is just my preference.

My worry would be running that very lean mixture (lean for pump gas) and then having a problem with the water injection.

I stand by my choice to run 100% alky in an alky injection kit. I can tune a car (but can't tuna fish) with an AFR safe enough that if the kit fails the engine does not and still make a big increase in power.

To each his own.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 06:56 AM
  #124  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Hi Ted, did you trim fuel and advance timing................or is it add R-OH and *BAM* instant gain in performance?
Originally Posted by Ted B
I use it because I've witnessed a tremendous improvement in power, and I haven't yet even upped the boost pressure yet. If my results can be duplicated with water, I haven't seen it . . . anywhere.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 07:32 AM
  #125  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
Yes, we trimmed the fuel and timing to the limit for 93 oct, then 93 + methanol - fair and equal comparison.

I gained around 50 ft lbs with a 2psi increase in the midrange, and saw an increase of ~35whp with ZERO boost increase at the peak. Those numbers are on a DD dyno, so tack on another ~15% for equivalent gains on a Dynojet. The torque will go up further now that I can add another 4-5psi of boost in the midrange (next dyno session).

Not too shabby.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 07:57 AM
  #126  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Wow, so Rich, did you figure out your alky kit problems?
Not yet, but I haven't had time (or good weather) to mess with it yet.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 08:03 AM
  #127  
Richard L's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
From: England
These days, you don't need to do it yourself, you can actually get the alcohol enhanced fuel from the pump. I am not sure how much alcohol should be add to achieve your goal of 108. I believe methanol itself is only 107 octane.


Read this excellent thread by Hotrod below:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=e85

or further reading.

http://www.aquamist.co.uk/dc/reference/part3.html
http://www.aquamist.co.uk/dc/reference/part4.html



Originally Posted by cfdfireman1
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...3&postcount=43

How much meth would I have to add to a tank full to get the octane up to say, 108? Do I need to run 108 all the time?
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 08:13 AM
  #128  
Richard L's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
From: England
David,

I am learning about alcohol injection - no reason why we can produce one for the EVO market.

I am interested in your target afr for the 100% alcohol system and approximate alcohol/fuel ratio that you feel comfortable? If it is a trade secret, I wouldn't be offended if you don't answer.

Richard

Last edited by Richard L; Nov 29, 2005 at 08:18 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #129  
cfdfireman1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,165
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Keep the corn.

Originally Posted by Richard L
These days, you don't need to do it yourself, you can actually get the alcohol enhanced fuel from the pump. I am not sure how much alcohol should be add to achieve your goal of 108. I believe methanol itself is only 107 octane.


Read this excellent thread by Hotrod below:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/show...&highlight=e85

or further reading.

http://www.aquamist.co.uk/dc/reference/part3.html
http://www.aquamist.co.uk/dc/reference/part4.html
I think I'll stick with methanol. I don't see the evo on this list. http://www.e85fuel.com/pdf/2006_ffv_list.pdf
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:02 AM
  #130  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Do you have an idea of the R-OH injected to gas ratio. And is it in progressive or on/off mode that you are operating? I'm also curious what is your lambda reading is.

Originally Posted by Ted B
Yes, we trimmed the fuel and timing to the limit for 93 oct, then 93 + methanol - fair and equal comparison.

I gained around 50 ft lbs with a 2psi increase in the midrange, and saw an increase of ~35whp with ZERO boost increase at the peak. Those numbers are on a DD dyno, so tack on another ~15% for equivalent gains on a Dynojet. The torque will go up further now that I can add another 4-5psi of boost in the midrange (next dyno session).

Not too shabby.

Last edited by SlowCar; Nov 29, 2005 at 11:06 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:27 PM
  #131  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
The ratio I'm using (as per my recollection) works out to about 33% of Methanol as a percentage of total fuel mass at max rate.

The unit is in progressive mode, activating at 10psi and reaching peak capacity at 20psi.

Lambda gradually tapers from 12:1 at the tq peak to 11:1 at the hp peak.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 01:57 PM
  #132  
SlowCar's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,456
Likes: 0
From: Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
So thats 1/3 v/v% MeOH 2/3 v/v% 93 gas: they both have a density of ~0.8g/cc. Effective octane = (0.33*110)+(0.66*93) = ~98 @ max rate.
Thank you for the info!
Originally Posted by Ted B
The ratio I'm using (as per my recollection) works out to about 33% of Methanol as a percentage of total fuel mass at max rate.

The unit is in progressive mode, activating at 10psi and reaching peak capacity at 20psi.

Lambda gradually tapers from 12:1 at the tq peak to 11:1 at the hp peak.

Last edited by SlowCar; Nov 29, 2005 at 11:39 PM. Reason: Before: (.33*93)+(.66*110) = ~98
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #133  
Ted B's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,334
Likes: 63
From: Birmingham, AL
No, I calculated that estimate is a percentage of mass, not volume. That equates to ~33% w/w MeOH to ~66% gasoline w/w, not v/v.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 02:38 PM
  #134  
gofaster87's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 523
Likes: 0
From: VEGAS
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I am sure you are aware in the UK the evo owners are very supportive of water injection - the forums over there have many users of aqua mist kits
By the way Al, Aquamist kits can use straight methanol with the change of a couple seals and in stock form can handle 75% methanol. Aquamist kits are not only used for water injection. Many of the benchmarks with the aquamist kits are with a 50/50 mix.

Last edited by gofaster87; Nov 29, 2005 at 03:07 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #135  
Richard L's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
From: England
Since gasoline and methanol has similar density, it doesn't really matter if your calculation is done by volume or mass.

I do have some concern with your set up, if you run out of methanol, you will be taking nearly 14% fuel out of your engine. If the afr at full-load is 11:1, taking 33% alcohol out will leave you running at close to afr of 13:1 !

Consider your "plan B" soon.

Originally Posted by Ted B
No, I calculated that estimate is a percentage of mass, not volume. That equates to ~33% w/w MeOH to ~66% gasoline w/w, not v/v.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:24 PM.