Water Injection Safe EGTs
#1
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Reno
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Water Injection Safe EGTs
So what are safe EGTs and AFR for water injection? I've gone into 1560s deg. F and no knock, but honestly I am somewhat worried. My AFR is about 10.6 is this Ok at high RPMs? Can I push it more?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but WI seems to not effect EGTs, but it definitely effects knock thresholds.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but WI seems to not effect EGTs, but it definitely effects knock thresholds.
#2
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
1560 deg F might be pushing it for the turbo. The turbine can't too hot or it may suffer some damage. For quick bursts it may be okay, but I would'nt do it for too long or too frequently. About 1300-1350 deg F is the most you want to sustain for any period of time. This is standard for most turbos, unless you have one with a turbine made of more exotic materials, then it could be more.
#4
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
Originally Posted by EVOgasmIX
1560 deg F might be pushing it for the turbo. The turbine can't too hot or it may suffer some damage. For quick bursts it may be okay, but I would'nt do it for too long or too frequently. About 1300-1350 deg F is the most you want to sustain for any period of time. This is standard for most turbos, unless you have one with a turbine made of more exotic materials, then it could be more.
900*C is conservative.
950*C is on the more aggressive side.
1015*C I have run while drag racing.
On injection, you should be in the 12's AFR, not 10.4. Don't ask me why your car is so slow.
#6
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
Originally Posted by nutrulz
12 AFR on 91 oct. and no methanol? I am using water only.
The best way to tune it would be while reviewing knock counts via Evoscan.
I would likely target 11.5-11.8 if water volume was sufficient.
Trending Topics
#8
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Reno
Posts: 793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is coming from a zeitronix EGT and O2 sensor. The EGT is in the second runner, and the O2 is in the DP just before the Test pipe. This is at 20 psi tapering to 18, controlled by an AEM with a GM boost control solenoid. I know this is conservative, but with 91 oct. how far would you push it if it were your car?
#9
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
Originally Posted by nutrulz
This is at 20 psi tapering to 18, controlled by an AEM with a GM boost control solenoid. I know this is conservative, but with 91 oct. how far would you push it if it were your car?
Now if you decide to add some methanol, even 50%, then totally different story.
It's good your tuning gradually.
#10
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would look more at adjusting the timing than the fuelling if you're running pure H20 only ..
As long as you can run the timing without knock then you're okay ..
I run on average around 880-920C with spikes to 940-950 on occasions ..
the only issue is what is consider sufficient water
The guide of 10-15% water to fuel volume doesn't really hold true for me (either that or I'm running way too aggressive timing !! )
As long as you can run the timing without knock then you're okay ..
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
The best way to tune it would be while reviewing knock counts via Evoscan.
I would likely target 11.5-11.8 if water volume was sufficient
I would likely target 11.5-11.8 if water volume was sufficient
I run on average around 880-920C with spikes to 940-950 on occasions ..
the only issue is what is consider sufficient water
The guide of 10-15% water to fuel volume doesn't really hold true for me (either that or I'm running way too aggressive timing !! )
Last edited by gunzo; Aug 10, 2006 at 04:13 PM.
#11
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
What kind of nonsense is this.
900*C is conservative.
950*C is on the more aggressive side.
1015*C I have run while drag racing.
900*C is conservative.
950*C is on the more aggressive side.
1015*C I have run while drag racing.
Hi TTP,
you are talking about temps picked up by an EGT sensor, max 2" from the head, correct ?
I'm asking because I read 90/100* C more from the turbine inlet EGT sensor...
Thank you.
#12
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
Originally Posted by ItalianEvo
Hi TTP,
you are talking about temps picked up by an EGT sensor, max 2" from the head, correct ?
I'm asking because I read 90/100* C more from the turbine inlet EGT sensor...
Thank you.
you are talking about temps picked up by an EGT sensor, max 2" from the head, correct ?
I'm asking because I read 90/100* C more from the turbine inlet EGT sensor...
Thank you.
Secondly tapping an EGT at the turbing housing is probably not a very good idea.
#13
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
I don't think the gasses would be hotter, further from the head.
It's been already discussed in another thread...
at high rpm, where the 4 collector merge into one just before the turbine inlet, the temps are much higher than in a single collector near the head.
And this is even confirmed by Eng. Bell in his " Maximum Boost " book.
Secondly tapping an EGT at the turbing housing is probably not a very good idea.
Sorry, it's not tapped ON the housing !
But in the exhaust manifold, in front of the turbine inlet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Richard L
Water / Methanol Injection / Nitrous Oxide
106
Dec 14, 2018 02:16 PM