Project 11.49 (stock turbo) to be built in AZ!
Originally Posted by razorlab
Guy here in Norcal did 11.58@119 with 272cams, tbe, mbc, 720cc, fuel pump, safc


Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO
I saw that today but I think we are missing something to make it a even statement: race gas? after market clutch? any other mods that someone might not be mentioning?
Boost peaking at 27 and dropping to 22-23 at redline
Where in this thread did the poster say he wanted to do 11's on pump gas?
Last edited by razorlab; Dec 23, 2005 at 11:55 PM.
Yeah, that's rAcErS. He is always on race gas, and that was after setting his cam gears to -4/-1. HE probably has a clutch, but I don't know if he has any other power mods. He knows what he's doing, but 119.4mph is one of the fastest mph's I've seen on here with the stock turbo. Most people don't achieve that, and it's still not above 120mph like I said. This is also with a 1.6 60', which is another thing I pointed out.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yeah, that's rAcErS. He is always on race gas, and that was after setting his cam gears to -4/-1. HE probably has a clutch, but I don't know if he has any other power mods. He knows what he's doing, but 119.4mph is one of the fastest mph's I've seen on here with the stock turbo. Most people don't achieve that, and it's still not above 120mph like I said. This is also with a 1.6 60', which is another thing I pointed out.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
I can't remember what track racers did this at but we do have one at close to sea level and one not so much sea level. It get's pretty cool here in winter, maybe 40-60 degrees at night. Which of course helps. Also alot of moisture in the air.
I think doing these kinda of times on stock turbo in AZ is going to be very very tricky.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Originally Posted by fromWRXtoEVO
HouseDJ,
I am still a dreamer, I think I am putting all my cards in top of the table and see what my car can do before I spend more money.
The center of the universe for me right now is to take my car to Firebird and run the car with some 99 OCT VP race gas.
I am hoping to be in the 12 sec flat barrier. I need a few passes to acomplish that. For many months many of my friends asked me to go and take my car to Firebird. My car should pick up 1 or 2 more PSI also.
I am still a dreamer, I think I am putting all my cards in top of the table and see what my car can do before I spend more money.
The center of the universe for me right now is to take my car to Firebird and run the car with some 99 OCT VP race gas.
I am hoping to be in the 12 sec flat barrier. I need a few passes to acomplish that. For many months many of my friends asked me to go and take my car to Firebird. My car should pick up 1 or 2 more PSI also.
Just for the record and this is from own experience I improved 1.5-2mph trap speed with the complete upper and lower intercooler pipes and 1gen DSM BOV(on my Buschur UICP), additionally I improved another 1.5-2mph higher trap speed by adding 3 gallons of 99oct VP fuel into an already existing 4 gallons of 91 in my gas tank . In addition to that you always have to consider the altitude factor, all this was on 3100 feet elevation and almost 100 degres.
My point is that the 119MPH can be achieve with the optimal conditions: good temp, lower altitud, pure race gas and other bolt ons not mentioned previously (intercooler pipes) .
This is not me creating comments from no where, this is me taking my EVO8 MR about 69 or 70 passes already and documenting every single ran under www.evolutionmr.net dragracing topic.
So, yes, I truly believe that guy could trap the 119MPH on the stock turbo under some specific conditions.
my .2c
My point is that the 119MPH can be achieve with the optimal conditions: good temp, lower altitud, pure race gas and other bolt ons not mentioned previously (intercooler pipes) .
This is not me creating comments from no where, this is me taking my EVO8 MR about 69 or 70 passes already and documenting every single ran under www.evolutionmr.net dragracing topic.
So, yes, I truly believe that guy could trap the 119MPH on the stock turbo under some specific conditions.
my .2c
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Yeah, that's rAcErS. He is always on race gas, and that was after setting his cam gears to -4/-1. HE probably has a clutch, but I don't know if he has any other power mods. He knows what he's doing, but 119.4mph is one of the fastest mph's I've seen on here with the stock turbo. Most people don't achieve that, and it's still not above 120mph like I said. This is also with a 1.6 60', which is another thing I pointed out.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
Btw, does NorCal have the same elevation and temp issues as Phoenix? I assume that's why it was posted, since I'm talking about going over 120 on the stock turbo in sub-par conditions witha flash.
i also believe that if rAcErS changed his cam gears to -2/-2, he may achieve a little better result & go over 120. in addition, if he had the Tomei 280 cams with 11.8 or even 12.0 specs, he would achieve the 120 mark easily.
a built head for me is the only way i can do this task.
Originally Posted by housedj
let me know if you decide to come up. there is a gas station close to the track that sells 101 octane unleaded. it used to be VP, now it's Shell. $5.99/gallon. it's all i use in the '03. the '03 hasn't seen anything less since my Dynoflash in 2004. i will probably tune 101 octane for my low boost map & C16 for my high boost map...
As far is the 101OCT gas, I honestly wouldn't see a great deal of power because my car was tuned for 91 however I hope to improve perhaps a couple of tenth of a sec and increase my trap speed a couple of miles. The 101oct gas would work much better if you have the tunning for it, I don't.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
-4/-1 usually gives the best top-end on the 272s. I don't know about the 280s. rAcErS tried other cam gear settings and -4/-1 gave the most by far.
You have an example of someone else doing this on the stock turbo? Are you basing this off some Japanese Evos or something? I don't see how the stock turbo could continue making any boost that high. It doesn't matter what the cams or head can do if there is no boost to make power. The stock turbo can't keep up with engine already at 6500rpm. You're saying this combo will continue to make power to 9k?
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
The stock turbo can't keep up with engine already at 6500rpm.
But you might be talking about boost dropping to about 1.3/1.4 bar around 6500?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
You have an example of someone else doing this on the stock turbo? Are you basing this off some Japanese Evos or something? I don't see how the stock turbo could continue making any boost that high. It doesn't matter what the cams or head can do if there is no boost to make power. The stock turbo can't keep up with engine already at 6500rpm. You're saying this combo will continue to make power to 9k?
Last edited by housedj; Feb 21, 2006 at 05:56 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,356
Likes: 0
From: in front of your car
even on my stock cams, i have 20 degrees of timing in the last 3 gears.even though i only put down 260hp, i STILL had 250hp @ 7800rpm. torque fell like a cliff put the hp just flattens out & my car is outta tune since the cat delete & fuel pump install.
Well, we don't have VTEC, and the Mynes Evo has a GT35r that is meant to rev that high. Two completely different scenarios. Project 10.99 here? Come on, now, let's be realistic. Having trouble hitting 12s at 107 and then setting goals and making claims such as that isn't kosher. Let's try to stay somewhat realistic.
I'd love to see the dyno sheet where you peak 260whp at ~6500 and only lose 10whp by 7800. That would be miraculous and completely unheard of for stock cams and stock turbo.
I'd love to see the dyno sheet where you peak 260whp at ~6500 and only lose 10whp by 7800. That would be miraculous and completely unheard of for stock cams and stock turbo.






