Notices
West Region Includes AZ, CA, HI, NV, UT.

Utah Evos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 01:19 PM
  #841  
scott88vr6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
I personally wouldn't run any more than 21lbs on 91.

Last edited by scott88vr6; Dec 27, 2004 at 01:26 PM.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 01:24 PM
  #842  
vtsnake's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: back in nowhere land
Originally Posted by scott88vr6
I personally would run any more than 21lbs on 91.
Well that sux *****. don't wanna run race fuel all the time, well not at 5 bux a gallon or whatever it cost.

yeah peer pressure sux.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 01:27 PM
  #843  
scott88vr6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
Are you building an Auto-X Car or Drag car?
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 01:54 PM
  #844  
liberty2000rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: uber bfe
Depending on how Al tunes your car, you shouldn't have a problem running 24psi on 91. That's where my car is set on my pump fuel map. I've tuned the car to run 10.5:1 afr's on pump fuel, and i've retarded the timing a bit. A friend of mine runs 28psi on pump fuel on his eclipse. Both of our cars are running gt35r's, his is an e-cover, and mine a ported shroud s-cover. If our cars run ok on pump fuel at 24psi, I don't see why you couldn't do it with the stock turbo. You'll probably exceed the shaft speed efficiency of the turbo though. My stock turbo would only hold 22psi until about 6800 rpm.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:01 PM
  #845  
vtsnake's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: back in nowhere land
roadracing more than autoxing. dragracing when i'm next to a z06, m3, sti, mustang, camaros.... at a redlight. Oh and supercharged s2000s driven by rich douchebags.

thanks 4 the info liberty. my turbos kinda stock. it's the tme. you think that would hold more boost than the stocker?

Last edited by vtsnake; Dec 27, 2004 at 02:15 PM.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #846  
liberty2000rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: uber bfe
I'm not familiar with the tme, do you know where there is a flow chart for it?? The fact that we are at higher altitude than most of the rest of the evo world, we have to run more boost to make the same amount of power. A flow chart will tell you exactly how much power you can make and the pressure ratio it will make it at. By reading a flow chart, you can see exactly where your turbo is going to be most efficient.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:17 PM
  #847  
vtsnake's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: back in nowhere land
Originally Posted by liberty2000rs
I'm not familiar with the tme, do you know where there is a flow chart for it?? The fact that we are at higher altitude than most of the rest of the evo world, we have to run more boost to make the same amount of power. A flow chart will tell you exactly how much power you can make and the pressure ratio it will make it at. By reading a flow chart, you can see exactly where your turbo is going to be most efficient.

you mean this? http://linux.forcedperformance.net/m...i_map_full.jpg
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #848  
liberty2000rs's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: uber bfe
I've been searching the forum for dyno charts and I noticed that most of the stock turbo cars will make more torque than hp. I guess im too used to seeing larger turboed car dyno charts.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #849  
UT_Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,601
Likes: 0
From: SL,UT
I've actually seen people who have said without upgrading the turbo to always make sure that you have more torque than hp on our cars, but you know, people say lots of things on forums
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 04:12 PM
  #850  
bullfrg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Idaho
Nice numbers guys, I guess I have a slightly weak Evo
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 06:43 PM
  #851  
scott88vr6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
You'll be up there in time
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 06:48 PM
  #852  
EvoRicer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Sac
Scott I cant see your dyno chart...im at work and gov comps suck...and I run 24 PSI with intake and upper IC pipe and HKS BOV. 25k miles almost 26 and my cars fine...except my clutch is dead...
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 06:56 PM
  #853  
scott88vr6's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
From: UTAH
Originally Posted by EvoRicer
Scott I cant see your dyno chart...im at work and gov comps suck...and I run 24 PSI with intake and upper IC pipe and HKS BOV. 25k miles almost 26 and my cars fine...except my clutch is dead...
But running on stock exhaust, stock fuel pump, stock injectors.......oh yeah and no fuel control doesn't make it a car that will last a while. It makes it a car that was rode hard and put away wet. Just my opinion. I would kind of like to have my car in a few years.

Last edited by scott88vr6; Dec 27, 2004 at 08:16 PM.
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 07:33 PM
  #854  
MSM_S2K's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by vtsnake
roadracing more than autoxing. dragracing when i'm next to a z06, m3, sti, mustang, camaros.... at a redlight. Oh and supercharged s2000s driven by rich douchebags.

blah, blah, blah ... and more blah, blah, blah?


Ray, ray, ray ... get back to werk!
Old Dec 27, 2004 | 08:20 PM
  #855  
silverofs's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: s.l.c ut
Originally Posted by EvoRicer
Scott I cant see your dyno chart...im at work and gov comps suck...and I run 24 PSI with intake and upper IC pipe and HKS BOV. 25k miles almost 26 and my cars fine...except my clutch is dead...
your car probably makes about 180whp with that much boost because your timing is being pulled like a bastard from the knock.
i gaurantee if you ran 20psi your car would make more power and be safer!
when rob says you can run that much boost you have to have the tuning to be able to do that!!! like retarding timing and adding fuel!

vtsnake anything over 20 to 22psi on the 16gtme is just blowing it right out of it's effeciency range! the 16g is just not that good up @ this elevation. if you want to make power up here your going to sacrafice spool up for more power! something that can flow 35 pounds per minute or more would be ideal for this altitude. this way you can run 20psi on pump gas and your outflowing a 16g @ 24psi by a mile.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:35 AM.